Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Good but below expectations, disappointed by an average story line
26 April 2019
Avengers Endgame for me, was good but not so good, it was fun but not so fun, it was exciting but not so exiting, it was emotional but just a little bit. From the get go it tries to establish things that are confusing. For me it broke the #1 code that made Marval movie great - don't break your own fictional universe's rules. Endgame breaks quite a few rules and I ended up at the finale waiting for explanation which never really fully came.

I did enjoy the movie, and at parts the movie delivered what it promised but it's by no means as great as I was hoping it would be.

For years we fans have speculated and analyzed what would happen. Take any simplest of the theory and that is what happens. It left me disappointed. It left me disappointed that Russo brothers went with a average at best storyline.

Infinity War was sort of a standalone movie, a person with basic knowledge of previous movies could watch it and enjoy it. This one, you need to know the entire plot until now. Even then this movie is not as good as the previous avenger movies.

Endgame is good and has lots of fan service but the humor seems forced and the story seems questionable. It might have worked if it didn't have such grand expectations but since it does, it is still a disappointment for me.

Verdict: 6/10
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Riddick (2013)
6/10
Riddick is awesome but the movie is not
21 September 2013
Ever since Pitch Black came out back in 2000 I've always been a fan of Riddick. I guess the character of a genuine anti-hero makes itself really intriguing. Riddick's moral compass is crooked; it points toward one thing and one thing only, survival. That's in the so presumed nature of a Furyan, to adapt to a harsh environment, to call it home, Riddick has very quick skill for adaptation, which had kept him alive after most of his race was dead and wiped out.

Riddick is a mean killing machine; he has no remorse, no regrets and would do anything moral or immoral, good or bad to survive. But this is where the moral compass comes into play. Riddick would not forsake those who show mercy to him. He has the immense need to preserve the good and innocence in people who actually have it. This makes for the times Riddick would tend and take care of women (at least with the ones with fairly good moral standings) and children.

The movie Riddick comes after a long hiatus, almost nine years since the second movie The Chronicles of Riddick, and Riddick fans like me have been eagerly waiting for it since its announcement few years ago. When I heard that the charismatic and infamous Kara 'Starbuck' Thrace of Battlestar Galactica, Katee Shackoff, would be playing a bad-ass role in the movie, I was even more excited. There they were two of my favorite action heroes, male and female, and they were in the same movie. I just couldn't wait.

The Chronicles of Riddick was an epic adventure type of movie; Pitch Black was a survival horror. I liked the adventure movie too but Riddick really shines when he's cornered and kept in these survival mode situations. Riddick is not really a decorated general, born leader type of soldier that The Chronicles of Riddick leaves him to be, so it is said that he was betrayed, cornered and left for dead. That's cool, because that would turn Riddick to his survival mode; and now he's in a planet that is more hostile then the one in Pitch Black, that is supposed to be more fun.

Riddick the movie has a relatively bigger budget, and a slightly more glamorous star-cast then the first movie, but this one lacks where the first movie had most of its charm. The characters, other than Riddick, in this movie, have next to no significance. Even Dhal, the character of a headstrong woman mercenary played by Katee Shackoff, has not much of a character definition, or even a more prominent role. Riddick does everything here, and since he's highly qualified to do them, all the other guys just stand back and admire a legend at work and just step forward when it's their turn to die.

It really weakens the movie though, since we don't know much about the characters, we don't really care if they live or die, and their deaths, one by one, just seem like an excuse to stretch the movie. There is no suspense and thrill. Only time we feel some amount of thrill is when Riddick is in danger, and there could only be so many of these scenes. It would have been some fun if Katee Shackoff's character got into some trouble and kicked ass to get out, but oddly enough, despite her great demeanor as a tough girl, she never really steps away from the ship or the base. She has, as far as I remember, not one scene with her and one of the creatures in the same frame. That's not cool.

Vin Diesel is awesome as Riddick, he's always had been, and he single handedly with his presence, hold the movie together, but I always found Riddick the sneaky bastard more fun than Riddick the ultimate warrior, and this movie has none in the set of characters for Riddick to play mind games with. Everything happens so fast that they seem to have started without properly knowing each other. Riddick does try to pull a few strings in the heads of the other main characters when the movie starts but one of them an idiot, another one is genuine good guy (which makes playing mind games really hard) and the last one is a girl who seems to have done an advanced degree in putting up a wall in the head. She just could take any amount of verbal abuse and doesn't at all care for mind games. Ofcouse our good Dr. Riddick never really has enough time in this movie to show this side of his talents but then we only see his warrior side in a survival horror.

I had waited a long time for this movie, and this is not a bad movie, but it is not enough. It tries to be the same as the first cult classic in the Riddick series but it lacks the psychological profiles and even the character profile of the creatures that made the first movie such dark and grim horror/thriller. The likes of Katee Sackhoff, Bokeem Woodbine and Matt Nable, are almost wasted in the movie for the lack of good character sketches, and these are good actors. I really missed Cole Hauser's bounty hunter character and Radha Mitchell's ship pilot with a guilty conscience. This movie has none of those. It has good action, but in terms of action I think The Chronicles of Riddick was better. This movie, for me, is not up to par for my high expectations; but it's not because of Riddick's character. Vin Diesel still got it and I would still wait impatiently if they'd announce another Riddick movie, but I would have loved the writer to breathe a little more life to the other characters in this one.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
‎Django a bit too much Unchained
27 January 2013
‎Django Unchained, One of the best western action dramas I've every watched until about 80-85% mark, until one crucial scene (if you watched the movie you'd know).

The movie shouldn've ended at that point, but it doesn't; and it moves to one of the worst endings I've ever watched in any of the western action flick.

Acting is really good, especially Christoph Waltz, Leonardo DiCaprio and Jamie Foxx. Samuel L. Jackson is also funny and does a good job. The sets and costumes are put together really well and the movie starts off with a bang and continues to intrigue. But sadly the ending was dreadful.

The movie delivers so goods until the certain point that it feels so bad to watch it end really really really bad.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Absolutely what a finale is supposed to be
17 July 2011
The movie is really an epic. It start on a high and never lets down. And since its so grand and fast, it does looses out on the parts where we have to slow down a bit and feel sorry for those who are dying between the epic battle scenes (most of the time they are important characters).

I have particularly noticed that this movie shows "You Know Who" as pretty weak compared to the previous ones; I believe this is done only in the movie so that Daniel Radcliffe could be shown of equal match if not superior, to Ralph Fiennes, from the moment the movie starts, cause if it is done at the exact time this is needed, I don't think Daniel Radcliffe has the acting powers to pull it off. I always liked movies where villains are more stronger so this is kind of a set back.

These are minor setbacks however, the movie makes up in terms of visuals, in 3D its a real treat. And don't worry about the story, this is the final chapter and this is more about concluding everything and giving you a good final showdown, the story was supposed to be Part I, this one is all about these are things you didn't know, this is how it ends, and in case of kids stories, "and they lived happily ever after", but Harry and Co. don't look much like kids anymore.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed