Change Your Image
xXLegendaryXx
NOTE: I rarely engage in serious (well, even at these times, it isn't really "Serious" , just not "driven towards creating humor I find amusing" I should say)discussion, but when I do engage in "serious" conversations...I will usually reply to something aimed at me if I see it.
However, sometimes I will not reply to something directed at me; such as for these following reasons:
1) Some pathetic people on here often get in over their heads on topics, lurch out forward without understanding the context or culture of the things they speak on, or tried to speak on. Upon realizing they overreached, and that they are at a level of deficit that can't be quickly overcome....they, at times, attempt to muddle the debate through false attribution of me, absurd innuendo, changing their own debate points, ignoring their glaring initial mistakes and overreaches, and pathetically/desperately trying to change/alter the conversation until all is muddled. Length is usually a focus of these distortion retreats; randomly citing things to fill a page up, though the content of what was cited was either never discussed, or never refuted...often times, even, agreed upon/and noted prior by me. People like this....who are too cowardly to stick to the topic; own up to their ignorance and mistakes? I tend to see their flailing attempts at muddle as a personal victory...requiring no further comments. It is their way of saying they can't debate on topic. Also, I am not going to waste my time correcting the false assertions someone cowardly tried to make me own, though I never supported them, or alluded to supporting them, in the first place. I just don't chase distortion runners like this...they are not worth chasing; they don't know anything all be told; are beneath me....and are obviously so delicate mentally, that their only recourse is to distortion-elongate in defeat. These pathetic people are so rooted in their ideals, and entrenched to a side of a war they mentally created, that they go through any mental gymnastics their weak psyche can utilize as a means to duck, dodge, distort, unfairly/ridiculous ly counter-label once they run into someone way beyond them as topic is concerned.
2) You have approximated troll tactics as I see it; and are not skilled/humerous at it. I like games, but not ones sloppily played.
3) You, because you are too ignorant and petty to understand/consider nuance, lump me in with people, groups, I never intimated any allegiance for...trying to, somehow, hold me partially accountable for whatever they might have stated because it fits the "me versus them" petty narrative that drives you mentally. I don't like being lumped with people I am not even aware of, or it being suggested I am linked to whatever moronic thing they might have said at some point. I'm not, and never will be, connected to anyone in a debate.
4) You keep citing the same disproven things over and over; and you don't know, or understand, the basic truths of/concerning a discussion, or debate, that are known by any and all people who seriously consider and discuss the given discussion/topic/de bate. In short, I'm not often willing to fill in the culture of something for you when you should already know if you are willing to engage the topic at a certain level. Say, for example, if we are discussing Sabermetrics and you never heard of WAR, yet you keep persisting within topic as if you know what is going on?? Say, we are discussing mid-term election results and the meaning of the 2010 GOP re-take of the House, and state assemblies... and you moronically think the GOP opened up new turf in 2010 by winning seats in, say, New Hampshire, despite how famously GOP New Hampshire has long been (explaining the easy flip for anyone who actually has an understanding of US election results and culture, and how frail such seats are in election years) excepting two recent elections riding a massive anti-GOP wave? Then that is likely a drop of you from my end....as your general starting point ignorance indicates you are not capable of discussing the issue from what the actual starting point for the topic is. If you don't know what WAR is, you can't discuss Sabermetrics. If you think the GOP winning back long-standing GOP seats in New Hampshire (they had only just recently lost in horrible national GOP years after years and years of holding) in 2010 is opening up new ground for the GOP and indicative of a realignment...then you know nothing about election swings, modern politics, realignments and logical seat flips. These are examples of what some idiots on this board have attempted to argue. I don't discuss with people who are aggressively clueless; this is sometimes made confusing for the other because some people don't realize that they are clueless inside a given topic or discussion.
5) You change/alter your username and I can't tell who you are.
If you might be wondering why I stopped speaking with you on a given topic? It is exceptionally likely that you began to do things noted in the 5 above.
Now...stop PMing me.
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
The Locusts (1997)
Moody Drama
OK first let me start by saying I love this movie. From the time period, the score, picturesque settings and Ashley Judd is absolutely gorgeous.
However I'm a bit confounded by several things; how was Mrs Potts responsible for her mothers untimely death and why did clay sleep with her?
Even after it seemed like he decided it was worth the risk; of her informing law enforcement of his whereabouts.
On a gloomy note it was sad to see fly boy commit suicide, but I also appreciate the writer for not making it a cliché happy ending.