Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Fright Night (2011)
9/10
Great remake of two vampire classics
19 May 2015
This 2011 version of the latter-day classic _Fright Night_ is as good a time you will have watching a vampire movie these days. The cast is great, the direction fast paced and the script witty and reverent at the same time. And, while it is a remake of my favorite vampire movie of the 1980s, it is also pays homage to the best American vampire movie ever, _The Night Stalker_.

While Charlie Brewster is getting the week-willed Peter Vincent to help him save Amy from Jerry Dandridge ("Jerry the vampire!?!"), the movie is also quoting pretty liberally from that classic 1972 Darren McGavin/Richard Matheson masterpiece. The new Fright Night shares a setting (Las Vegas) with the McGavin movie. But more importantly, the first half of the long sequence when Charlie searches Jerry's house and becomes a believer is an almost shot-for-shot quote of McGavin's suspenseful search of the vampire's house at the climax of _The Night Stalker_.

Of course, the new movie has its own payoff to that scene, one that elicits a shudder and a laugh. The laugh comes from the fact that we should certainly have seen that payoff coming, but the suspense of the action just prior has thrown us off guard. This scene, like most of the effects shots, works even better in the original 3D.

There are many other pleasures to this movie, including solid performances by Anton Yelchin, Imogen Poots and Toni Colette as the frightened but sophisticated protagonists. Colin Farrell is able to pull off a modern version of the Dandridge character, sexy in a rougher, sweatier way. He may not have the gravitas of Chris Sarandon, but Charlie is right to be wary of this guy, vampire or not.

David Tennant and Christopher Mintz-Plasse steal the show. Tennant updates Peter Vincent by turning McDowell's kindly but cowardly gentleman into a drunken primadonna, Simon Cowell as vampire slayer. And Mintz-Plasse's Evil Ed is hilarious in nerd mode and vampire/nerd mode. His longing for a lost friend is very real and makes his fate all the more touching.

If you have not seen this, check it out. For some reason it did not do well at the box office, but it is the perfect antidote to the sparkling vampires and cuddly werewolves of recent years.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Calling (I) (2014)
5/10
Derivative but interesting
7 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
A viewer can see why this Canadian production really did not get much release in the U.S. The plot is as derivative as any serial killer movie today, with the "Fargo" knock-off setting and the misdirection too familiar. Is it about a serial killer? Yes, but really it is about the psychological hang-ups and strained relationships of its lead characters. As one reviewer mentioned, there are enough plot lines and character setups to fill at least a miniseries, but in a 107 minute movie, they just quell any momentum.

Sarandon was saddled with a terribly underwritten lead character; she has virtually nothing to do in the film except look tired and over-matched. There are no redeeming qualities to this character and I found myself somewhat disappointed when the twist ending left her alive. Had she been the twelfth victim as the plot clearly leads us to believe, at least there would have been a point to her character.

Still, I have a soft spot for any thriller, no matter how meek, that is set in a snowy small town with quirky characters. It is almost always good to see Ellen Burstyn (the remake of "The Wicker Man" is the reason for "almost")and Topher Grace does a nice job as the green cop. Christopher Heyerdahl was creepy as the killer and could have done more if his part had been better written as well.

Overall, not something I will re-watch, but for fans of this sort of slow burn serial killer stuff, an OK attempt.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pure Charm
2 December 2014
Roy Del Ruth directed this charming bit of Americana, based on stories by Booth Tarkington. Doris Day plays a tomboy named Marjorie Winfield whose family moves to a new neighborhood in their small town. Hilarity and romance ensue as she meets the boy across the street and he wins her heart after many light-hearted complications. The great Gordon McRae plays Bill Sherman and gets to show off his voice and some comic acting chops. Day and McRae have real chemistry here.

Much of the hilarity comes from Marjorie's family, with Leon Ames, Rosemary DeCamp, Billy Gray and Mary Wickes taking turns making the audience laugh. Gray steals every scene he is in and has some great scenes with Ellen Corby as the stuffy (and gossipy) school teacher. His cough alone is worth a dozen laughs.

This film is often considered a weak cousin to "Meet Me in St. Louis," one of the truly great Hollywood musicals. That film also centers around a young woman finding love with a neighbor boy ("The Boy Next Door") and features a beleaguered father also played by Ames. Certainly, "On Moonlight Bay" does not have the great score, the perfect art direction, or the magic of Judy Garland. But it does have a true spirit of fun, some great music, and a lot of great comic scenes.

This film was an instant hit and inspired a quick sequel ("By the Light of the Silvery Moon") that was not quite as good but is certainly worth a look.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Winter Kill (1974 TV Movie)
6/10
A mystery with a fun 70's cast
2 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the many movies that a local TV station in Reno used to run on weekday afternoons. I first saw it in 1979 or 1980. It creep-ed me out as a kid, but today I appreciate the 1970's atmosphere, the ubiquitous TV movie cast (Joyce Van Patten, Eugene Roche, John Larch, Charles Tyner, and Robert F. Simon among others), the good will that Andy Griffith always generates in this type of role.

It is worth watching this movie just to see a man wearing an entire suit made of corduroy (while he is at work, as an attorney). As creepy as that may seem today, the masked killer, some atmospheric shock scenes, and the sense that anyone could be next are what keep the movie going.

There is a terrific scene between Griffith (as the town sheriff) and Charles Tyner (as one of many suspects). The look on Tyner's face when a deputy delivers a critical piece of news shows the value that character actors can bring to a little movie like this.

Also noteworthy is the fine performance by Sheree North as Griffith's weary romantic interest.

All in all, a nice time-filler that is available on DVD from the low-budget Warner Archive collection.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ranks among the best with Spartacus and Galdiator
20 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The Fall of the Roman Empire ranks as one of the more intelligent epics. While some of Anthony Mann's set-pieces can justifiably be called over-the-top (check out the giant hand that delivers Commodus to the Forum), the script is unusually smart and the acting uniformly good. Even Stephen Boyd delivers a good performance, though he pales next to James Mason, Christopher Plummer, Anthony Quayle, and Alec Guinness. Most would quibble with the historical accuracy of the film, but not with its theme of reckless ambition destroying a mighty empire. When the generals and senators accompanying Marcus Aurelius on his final campaign conspire to assassinate him, they are choosing to preserve their power. They allow Commodus (Plummer), the emperor's ambitious and nearly mad son to ascend instead of Aurelius's own choice, Livius (Boyd), a battle-wearied general more interested in peace than power.

There is none of the over-sexed hokum of DeMille, or the self-important Christian imagery of Ben-Hur or Quo Vadis. And while the film is not as emotionally satisfying (or jarring) as Spartacus, it is well worth the time.

Ridley Scott filmed a similar take on the same era and many of the same characters in his superb Gladiator. But that film is much more of a tale of personal redemption in the face of insurmountable odds than FOTRE. The former is an imagining of how a great society began to fall; the former shows how humankind survives such ordeals. As such, they are both examples of the finest film-making that money can buy.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed