Reviews

First of all ,let me say I am of the majority of people that really liked and respected this film.(No,I'm not mentally unstable ,or a loyal Gallo fan either). I have seen many horrible films,and this does NOT fall in the category of those: It's far too artistic and complex.The only reason people call it 'horrible' (I believe) is because of the slow-pace of the film,(it's like visual narration) ; Gallo's constant presence on-screen, and the sparse dialogue -(until the film's conclusion-which pummels you with words,so you have to keep with the rhythm!)

The film visually tells the story.It is not for the casual movie viewer. I like films like that. It is deeply sensitive and mesmerizing.You have to be patient- very patient and let the story gradually unfold. Although you may think you know what the conclusion is as you watch,you still will be aghast.And I'm not referring to any 'shock value'at all.

This is the sort of film that challenges the viewer in all aspects.It is not meant to dazzle or blow your senses away.It deals with human frailty,which a lot of people don't find 'entertainment.'

It stirs up deep emotions of a tortured soul.I found Mr.Gallo's performance daring and ground-breaking, for it is so sensitive and fragile for a man to project.Like Roger Ebert said,"No man in Hollywood is gonna imitate the frailty in Gallo's voice as he pleads to a girl in a certain scene..."

In conclusion I'd recommend this film highly for the sensitive,intelligent,artistic,patient film lover.The fact that Mr.Gallo doesn't relinquish his artistic vision for the mass audience is worthy of praise.As for the 'controversial scene'- make up your own mind.

The main reason to see this cute film is Jude Law's likable performance as Danny.He out-acts everyone and steals every scene he's in.He plays a lovesick guy out to win the engaged-to-someone-else- girl he helped deliver when she was a baby and he was 5-years-old.He has quite a hurdle of obstacles.His pursuit is gentle,yet persuasive.He's very charming in it,and females will love him.My husband liked this film also and felt it is true-to-life in some ways-how a person pursues someone who could be totally wrong for them.It's not an excellent film.The choice to have Gretchen Moll as Jude's love interest was a bad one.She acts poorly,and there is a lack of chemistry.However Jude's intense stares at her and genuine obsession make the film a real treat. Yes,there are some amusing moments I won't spoil.Another person I enjoyed in this is Martha Plimpton.Her scenes with Jude are funny,and she uses him to solve a problem of her own.The result is actually the funniest scene in the film.I think it's a flawed yet great little movie.

I thought this film was quite good and more genuine in its story, for it questions the wisdom of passion.Jude Law is incredibly vulnerable , yet fiercely determined ,in his portrayal of a lovestruck, obsessed vampire.The object of his desire is a very sassy lady who brings elements to the film that are unpredictable.Some of Law's scenes are gross, but therein lies a victim in him.It carries a lot of tension , for I did not know where the plot was going-I like that.I try to guess the outcome of movies as I watch them. A lot of movies are just too predictable; this one is not.If you like a different kind of vampire film, with a lot of emotion and some sexy love scenes, this is a movie you'll love.If you are a fan of Jude, by all means see it.He uses his eyes in incredibly intense and versatile ways. He is charming and kind to people.He's also not afraid of looking absolutely horrible.He's more than a pretty face, much more. I would compare this more to "Basic Instinct" and "Fatal Attraction" than any of the Dracula films. But be warned: although this is not your typical vampire film, there is a lot of bloodshed.