tmntvspr-419-43420

Objectively, this is a4/10, but it's so much fun and if you add a drinking game, the most fun you'll have with friends.

Only 3 Rules: 1 drink if Nudity, cursing (ass, damn count), and any death

Take small sips from the beginning, don't be a hero, you may die.

Anyways, bad acting, awful characters, horrible continuity.. and it all equals the best movie you'll watch this year. They don't make them like this anymore, and for good reason, but this movie is the epitome of mid 2000s horror, and it's all the better and worse for it.

It's dumb fun at its best and I wouldn't change it. Why has there not been a sequel?!?!

This was made in final cut pro, with no path to a compelling story. The purpose of a documentary is to show a progression of an event and add commentary to recontectualize events with hindsight.

Instead, this "documentary" just compiles clips from the internet (out of context) that add nothing to the event.

Adding white text on black backgrounds does not a documentary make. The social media aspect could have been a 5 minute mention at most, not CONSTANTLY.

This reminds me of the Chris Watt documentary that added nothing and was just a long form compilation of videos.

This would have been interesting with interviews from Psychologists, Forensic Scientists, Lawyers, PR Reps, and Law Enforcement to show HOW and WHY the trial went the way it did, HOW it went the way it did, and it's cultural significance.

Viners did more editing and story telling in 6 seconds than this series did in 3 full length episodes.

Also, I watched EVERY minute of the trial live, and avoided all commenters until this verdict was read. I 100% agree with how the jury decided with every claim from both sides. Documentaries will inherently have bias, but they mold it into the narrative. This comes off as a conspiracy video from eBaums from the early 2000s, rather than a documentary.

Darth News must have made a video that wronged the "creators" of this series.