Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Laid back action flick with teen girl-daddy reconciliation
30 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The story is very thin and ridiculous, but carried well by Kevin Costner. Action! taking it slow. Action! Slow.. Action.. alternating.

The daddy-daughter issues and how they get back closer again, is decently written but still has some ridiculous things like daughter sneaking off to a rave and nearly getting raped if it weren't for daddy saving her. His repeated attempts to give her a bicycle. Her acting incredibly comfortable and relaxed all of the sudden, a- typical teen stuff. The daddy issue fix is way to easy.

This though, is not so bad as the funny and corny lines. The Italian accountant, trying to delay a probably painful questioning, by offering a recipe to the daughter. Hah. The newborn baby getting named after Kevin's character Ethan, for not killing them when he could? Doh! And lots of other misplaced clichés like his (ex?) wife looking up to him while getting in a cab, or spontaneously crying when she sees him dance with the girl. This was acceptable in the eighties and nineties movies. Now, we would like to see some better scripts, less misplaced dumb clichés.

Still, I can live with all that. It's just a movie with enjoyable images, scenes, actors and a story is being told.

The thing is, I got really irritated by the audio. It's like the sound engineer decided to add re-verb at random. I was watching this movie on netflix, so I checked it with a different copy which sounded exactly the same. OK it MIGHT be a technical issue with conversion from 5.1/dts/whatever to stereo. Still that is no excuse.

So be warned the audio might trip you off like it did me.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good movie, don't listen to the haters. It takes a bit of intelligence to follow the story. They just couldn't cut it.
12 November 2014
I am reading so many negative reviews on this movie, but they are clearly caused by poor judgment and lack of attention.

The story builds up nicely. The characters aren't underdeveloped at all. However, that character development happens mostly in the last 20 minutes or so. This is a movie that is unfolding through several threads, coming together at the end, clarifying the characters.

I do not need to add any words about the plot. It may seem puzzling to those who are used to be fed the cliché clues, overstating what comes next, but I think it was a very good plot and well executed. True, there should have been some more depth in the acting to enjoy but that would contradict the cold professionalism which is inherent to CIA, hit men and war criminals.

I say, make sure your IQ is three digits worth and enjoy this movie which does evoke 007 much, but harsher.
27 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Let's Be Cops (2014)
4/10
a matter of taste but essentially stupid.
26 October 2014
Let's be honest here. This movie has one quintessential quality: stupidity. The duo of make-belief cops is so stupid, I wonder how they made it this far in their lives without having a lethal accident. Basically it's two thirty-something guys with their careers in a sinkhole, suddenly finding great joy and opportunity in pretending to be cops.

Through it all they keep doing remarkably stupid things, shamefully stupid things, and ridiculously stupid things.

It appears this is where the movie delivers. You can watch almost two hours of these guys being really stupid - it is up to you to regard this as a funny thing, or as shamefully bad taste. For me, it is the latter.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stretch (2014)
6/10
a bit of a stretch
7 October 2014
An amusing movie about a player with a gambling debt, trying to save his bones from snapping. The story is OK, feels original, but the pace changes a lot. For a comedy it's not that funny I think. Halfway the movie the main character is forced to go all-in, and that's where sh!t gets real. Now I'm curious what's next. His ex girlfriend distracts him, just when he needs to stay on target the most. Now this is just lame. It doesn't make anything better, it's just an unwelcome distraction for me, the entertainee. I have little choice but to follow along. The rest I won't tell.

Acting is on the level, everything looks legit but I just don't feel the guy cracking under the pressure. Either he's got solid rock balls, or he's not THAT good an actor.

Still I was quite entertained, you probably also will be.
11 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Age of Tomorrow (2014 Video)
1/10
No, no, no, NO!
5 July 2014
After watching the first ten minutes I felt my brain was in agony so badly, that it was close to a seizure. Quickly I fast forwarded and... no, no,no NO! This movie should be labeled as harmful.

I voted "awful", but there should be a rating like "cheap rubbish" or "please make a law against this". So if you were lead to believe this movie is just "awful", that is only because the IMDb rating system doesn't offer an adequate description for the kind of movies The Asylum makes to fool consumers into thinking they are gonna watch something good while in stead it is simply cheap rubbish, meant do deceive you in to buying the DVD. Essentially, it is fraud. A hustle.

Though I must say, this movie - and others like this one from The Asylum's kitchen - yet have something to offer. To who'd like to count all the inconsistencies, faults, gaps, goofs and bad things, it would be pure joy to watch. Also, you could find joy in wondering WHY. Or simply laugh at all that is so wrong, it kinda gets good. But sadly The Asylum's movies are not that kind of wrong.

So unless you enjoy the pain of watching bad movies, or have OCD, you really do not want to waste your time and money on this. Or internet bandwidth. Be warned.
57 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dominion (2014–2015)
1/10
Religion raped
24 June 2014
This series is a monster. Like the angels portrayed in it. Ugly, aggressive, pointy teeth - angels, really? The premise is a "what if" of monstrous proportions. This makebelief is one of horror, brought on us by angels, for the last three decades. Now I am willing to make a stretch to go along for a minute. But .. all I saw was distasteful, cheap horror and violence.

I am not a religious man at all. But the stories, the images of angels are part of our culture - which "dominion" tries to alter into something really bad. For me, this equals rape.

This series, like the movie "Noah", is raping our cultural and religious heritage. It just should not have gotten approved.
16 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Never mind the plot, it's a great action movie
24 March 2014
Scarlet Johansson kicking ass! Need I say more? This movie is about as much what you may expect from a movie of the Marvel series. But, the story line was not a good choice in my opinion. Weak, unbelievable, grotesque. Though it doesn't matter much, because the action is great!

Great weapons, stunts, fighting sequences, etc. I don't recommend watching it in 3D like I did. The film has a dark tone and the 3D makes it worse. I'm not anti-3D but 3D projections do have significant shortcomings, which I thought would have been improved over time. It depends on the type of projector I guess, how bright the screen is lit.

Very cool was the Falcon, daddy I want a suit like that! All in all this is a spectacular movie that surely will not disappoint.
7 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The 100 (2014–2020)
3/10
teen drama in "After Earth"
20 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
There is a lot of potential in the story - the viewer is warped into a postapocaliptic future, with mutated wildlife and unknown threats. However, this one deploys a group of teens which, quite predictable, make a mess of it. Basically it's a teen drama set in After Earth.

Do I believe it? No. Really. So humans combined a dozen spacestations, and now there's been a 500 - 1000? people living in there for 79 years, without supplies. Right.

One of those youngsters wears old pilot/bikers goggles as an accessory. Nice touch, but no. This guy is the first to swing on a rope. Yes, a (new) rope, just conveniently hanging over a river. The rope is badly camouflaged with some plants, but still it is shown for at least 10 seconds, clearly a rope. Now if I was the director, I would have that scene redone. Or perhaps they ran a tight budget and could not redo bad shots? The guy doesn't even use his goggles now he finally has a chance to. Good thing he gets killed seconds later. The 100 soon diminish to 98,97,96 ... it's just 99 bottles of beer on the wall all over again. The clothing seems pretty pristine for being 79 years old too.

Not too much effort was made to think "The 100" trough. Lets just try to make a teen hit series, but cheaply.

Will I watch episode 2? Nope.
82 out of 172 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
If you are not a fan, you may find this movie hard to watch.
25 February 2014
For a fan film, this is a huge undertaking I bet. I found it not so well executed, as the acting, directing, screenplay, script are mostly amateuristic. The audio was fairly nice and the CGI is jumping out as the classy aspect of this movie. Impressive, really. The blue-key was not properly applied and it shows, badly.

We see a Jedi master, kind of Obi wan, and the prodigy, kind of like Anakin. Throughout the film there are lots of scenes and lines that look very familiar. It seems this film is more like a tribute, re-hashing bits from the originals, stitched together with a story around a truly naive princess.

Also some action scenes were fairly nicely done, where one can see they had to make do with little equipment. Conclusion: not all was that bad. I was slightly entertained, but the big damper is the lack of consistency. I just couldn't just go with it you know. The only way to watch this and properly enjoy it, is to be a true Star Wars fan.

Key to understanding this movie is not to compare it with big budget studio productions
37 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
95ers: Echoes (2013)
9/10
intelligent, well executed SF indie
30 September 2013
The story is catching, smart and doesn't spill any clues prematurely. A clever twist of the old time travel theme. I liked it. Acting is very good, the SFX are pretty good but could have been conceived better. The timeline visualization with the ID popping up and bleeping, seemed a little weak to me. Otherwise, the screenplay is very well done - the "rewinds" visualized very nicely. The audio is not as clean as a Hollywood production, but closer to reality. In a server room for example, we hear the hardware whizzing. Though the complex plot should give rise to plenty inconsistencies, I saw none. Surely, if I would search for those, I would find some. To me, this level of attention for detail is the mark of a genius. Very much worth to watch!

I have noticed that this movie is called "95ers: Echoes" (2012) as well as "Time Runners" or "95ers: Time Runners" (2013). This is a bit confusing, but all refer to the same movie.
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Atlantis (2013–2015)
2/10
Queer and idiotic trip through twisted details of mythology
29 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Out of curiosity I watched the first episode of this new fantasy series. Well, fantasy it is - just not very good fantasy. Firstly we see Jason survive an imploding bathyscaphe at great depth, and wake up on a beach. Then we get to watch his naked torso for about 19 seconds flat, with nothing else in view at all. I guess it must be to bait and hook teenager girls. Oh, is that what it's about? Fortunately there's a set of new, perfectly fitting clothing right next to him, so he gets dressed. Next he walks into a city (where of course all speak modern-day English) and gets attacked by a two-headed dragon (for trying to touch it) and right after, by guards. Luckily he escapes and meets Pythagoras, who is apparently in some way related to Hercules, coming in next bossing Pythagoras around.

This, to me, looks like a bad dream of a confused scriptwriter on acid. Patiently I wait for the moment, where all of this idiocy gets to make some sense.

And yes, as soon as the next scene develops, it all falls into place. Many worlds, great forces, the oracle who is probably his mother, and the hint that Jason is the son of a very important man, or perhaps-a god.

From here, I can dream up the rest of the story. Jason probably gets challenged a lot, meets the love of his life (which is bound to be a problematic relationship), battles the Minotaur and many other foes of ancient mythology.

The city has 20000 inhabitants. They are all summoned to the palace square, where they are addressed by king Minos, to draw a stone. However, there are at most 1000 persons in the square, and many of them seem to have copies all over the square. Then they line up to each take a stone. It is not very speedy, on average everybody takes 12 seconds. By this rate, it all will be over in... 20.000x12/3600= 67 hours. All attended by the king, so that would have to be stretched over 8-hour days, adding up to a full week of selecting 7 people. If I were that king, I would have thought of a somewhat shorter and less boring method to select 7 out of 20000. But hey, when the day is done all 20000 have magically passed.

This little insult to my intelligence is just one of many. Now, I really don't expect a series like this to be historically of mythologically correct, or scientifically accurate, but hell - the scriptwriters should know how to do basic math and not try to defy common sense. I'm feeling so much vicarious shame for them, it's almost unbearable.

Pythagoras gets selected, and spends a last supper with his best friends Hercules and Jason (who he has just met, so yesterday Hercules was his only friend) and for the second time Pythagoras gets stereotyped for being obsessed with triangles. Shame!

Ah, the princess doubts her father - clearly SHE will get to be the love interest of Jason.

More goofs: Jason draws a sword, and inspects it. It is clearly visible the sword has no sharp edges, just a sharp point. Still, it will do and he takes it to fight a monster. What's he gonna do, puncture the beast? All clothes and garments look unused, brand new. Nothing is dirty or worn. BBC and Urban Myth Films, why don't you go take a lesson from the original Star Wars movies.

But most of all, it is so wrong to have Greek mythology take place in Atlantis, first of all because Atlantis is not even a myth, it is mentioned in ONE old story which got propagated in modern times. This series feed our youth with twisted and confused stories that pretend to be the real myths. I can't help feeling a bit sick of this. I feel sad for how mythology gets violated and replaced by this crap.

Sadly, the series is bound to get popular.
53 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
After Earth (2013)
3/10
Glory to Will & Jaden
18 September 2013
In the first minutes, Jaden gets portrayed as best of his class, and Will as the hero without fear. This does sound like a personal glorification, if you ask me.

Jaden, a truly spoiled adolescent but not yet an actor, fails to hide his juvenile arrogance and smug, specially in the most emotional expressive scenes. That is because he hasn't lived that sh*t yet. Will obviously failed to see that, or he wouldn't have allowed his son to put up a performance to be torn apart by critics.

Sorry I just cant enjoy a movie, seeing that arrogant snot pretend to act.

M. Night Shyamalan has proved a total whore to delivering on demand movies, even if they're bad. OK, the guy has a creative imagination and sure has the stones for the job but, I feel he's willingly collaborating on a bad movie.

Since this is all Will Smith, it is his doing. Will has seriously missed the pot while p*ssing this one.

The scifi tec is all very nice, but in just 1000 years everything has evolved? We see plants with moving leaves, a new species of eagle and big cat... In evolutionary terms, nothing new evolves is 1000 years but lots of species get extinct. With a compromised atmosphere, it are the small animals that survive - they only get bigger in lots of oxygen. So, they should have set the time they left earth to a 100.000 years ago at least, to give the new species some credit.

I must say the second half of the movie got better, more action thus more entertaining. But I did get tired of Jaden's eyebrows moving so high up they seemed to hover above his head, like in a cartoon.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lost hope
17 June 2013
I had some hope for this movie, as the first two minutes were not too bad action in a fast pace, but then... the titles, two minutes of stills. No panning even. That really pulled me back to my original bias, that this would be a badly done movie. Yep. Some minutes later Robin and Marian have a dialog. Both performances are truly beyond every grade of awful. The conversation dry and unable to catch my interest in any way. At this point, I see that any further watching of this poor excuse for a movie, would be a real pain. So I deleted it, and decided to write this as a warning. Even if you are a Robin Hood fan, or like to grab a low budget movie once in a while, do not watch this one. It is a f*ckload of diseased crap.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hang Loose (2012)
2/10
don't bother.
21 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This comedy starts out as a flat tire with the main character just being an insecure wimp. The scenes are just way too long, not so funny, even not interesting. Bad acting. Bad studiowork: two parasailing sidekicks sound like they are in a very small chamber, in front of a greenkey, in stead of flying over a beach. I skipped through the movie to speed it up. Still found it slow and boring. The end, which I did not bother to watch, is probably something like everybody makes it back to the wedding in the nick of time, and the wimp gets the hottie. Yes, it reminds me of that actually funny movie "The Hangover", which this movie feels like - a hangover.
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sirius (2013)
We were promised disclosure, but were hustled for $10
25 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Steven M. Greer is central in this production, summarizing footage that was claimed as "proof" for decades already so nothing much new there. Unclear video's of old hoaxes and apparent moving lights, of which a few were definitely a lens flare. Images widely available and quite old.

Also he refers to the Brahmāstra weapon mentioned in the Mahabharata. That text is spiritual by nature, and some people claim it describes a nuclear weapon. But that is just a willful misinterpretation of a spiritual story, which is sometimes used as an argument to support the claim that alien civilizations have been interfering with humanity throughout history.

Greer refers to himself as an ER doctor, but he quit that line of work in 1997. He has not been a practicing doctor since, yet he is constantly referred to as doctor. I guess that is the one thing which gives him some credibility, and he milks that titles to the max.

We see Greer meditating, claiming that is the way to summon Alien ships. Also we see Greer carry a sidearm. Paranoid? Yeah, I thought so too.

Then, attention shifts towards an all-embracing conspiracy theory: new and better energy sources are claimed to be prevented from ever getting patented. The Bilderberger group. And other.

Three items are shown that would have to fit the bill of disclosure: a free energy device, which is clearly a simple coil picking up a magnetic field from under the table to power a light bulb. This is probably the lowest Greer is going, to support his claims. Does he actually believe that "free energy" device, I wonder. To me it made me think of the youtube video's of cellphones apparently causing corn to pop, while in fact they hid parts of a microwave oven under the table. No effort was made in the movie, to show the "free energy" device in a less suspicious experimental setup.

The "miniature alien" was confirmed to be human by researcher Garry Nolan from Stansford University, though Greer claims it was proved alien by the same Garry Nolan!

Lies, lies lies.

Finally, a device was shown that allegedly lost weight when in motion. Let me think a reason why this isn't allover the papers by now. Ow, right, because it's a fake, just like the "free energy" device.

The fact this movie did not disclose ANYTHING is widely supported by the lack of any scientific news, like scientists baffled over the shown devices - which would inevitably get picked up by the media. But of course, there is a huge conspiracy preventing such publications.

So looking back, there was a big promotion campaign promising major disclosure in a free movie. But it is just a commercial production cleverly devised to snatch $10 out of every UFO-believer's wallet. It is a clever con.

I can't say I'm surprised.
38 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mac and Me (1988)
6/10
Nice eigthies movie for kids.
25 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was rated as the worst ever, but I thought is was done quite well. You'd have to think of the target audience: Eighties kids, teenagers. They didn't mind the clumsy muppet play, it's a compelling story at a nice pace. A family of aliens gets taken from god knows where, could be a moon of Saturn by the looks of it, back to Earth by an automated NASA explorer spacecraft. They get into a big turmoil at the NASA base, but escape in the confusion. The youngest one gets separated and lands with a family which is just moving in the state. After that, things indeed look somewhat like E.T. There are folks here saying it is all stolen from E.T., well that must be true, though there wasn't anything really reminding me of ET - it is only when I consciously compare the scripts, certain things look similar. There were some really weird things yes like the obvious referring to McDonalds (must be a sponsor), Coca Cola as the beverage of choice for the aliens - it even brought them back to life. the McDonalds scene is pretty weird but hey - nobody said this movie shouldn't be. Dancers all around, even on the parking lot, freaking out on a kids party - Ronald McDonald is there too. The funniest goof is when the waitress hands out empty cups with straws, one falls on the ground, the younger girl picks it up - they didn't even bother to redo that scene, probably because it was a ridiculous scene anyway. Finally, all ends brilliantly, the aliens adept really well, and become true Americans!

The acting, screenplay, music and general production were of genuine B- movie quality. Only the special effects were not as good as one would expect in production with a reasonable budget like this one. Bud kids, in the time of the release, weren't that picky like they are now in this 3d animated era. Did I find this movie entertaining? Surprisingly, yes I did!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mockbuster, a bit entertaining - on a geek level though.
24 March 2013
Original title, as displayed in the movie: Alien Predator War.

This is actually a nice movie, considering the budget and the level of amateurism. The story is thin but interesting. The cinematography is really amateuristic. It is clear what it is supposed to look like, but it just doesn't.

The movie score is monotonous at best. Better than no music, they must have thought. Some kind of elevator music I think. The acting is fairly decent, save Robert Amstler's performance (Reinhardt/Alien invader) which is more like pretending to act, while stepping through the forest scenery like a 1967 sasquatch. Amstler is best described as a cousin of Arnold Schwarzenegger who never took acting lessons. Also he is the producer of this movie. Multi-tasking is common in these mockbuster movies. Rene Perez is director, cameraman, writer, editor, and fight choreographer.

Special effects are creative but far from good, again with an ultra low budget in mind - fair. There is some inspired screenplay, like making use of the environment nicely (the huge fallen trees). An alien invader (predator lookalike from the movie "Predator") comes in. Very creatively the dreadlock-like beady hear strings are suggested with pieces of ragged cloth. Also, it's stepping through the woods like bigfoot. That's when I realized it must be the same actor playing Reinhardt. Another alien (a "gray") transmits information in an inaudibly garbled voice. I still wonder what it was saying.

The cgi guy worked miracles. Really, I take off my hat. Nice work!

There is a scene with bears, which is clearly out of a documentary like from Discovery or National Geographic. Well, as long as they paid for it it's okay. And YES! There is nudity which seems to arouse the praying predator, breathing heavily and grunting like an animal - and wow! It appears silicone breast implants were available in 1894. Later, in present time, the "gray" alien also likes to look at the naked female body. Kinky aliens, those.

The camera-work and editing allowed a little too much filler footage, seconds in where nothing really happens or is added to the movie, and no entertainment value is apparent. A lot of lost seconds, makes the movie advance a little faster trough time. At the end I was like: "Really? Already?"

Concluding I'd say it is a nice movie on the amateur level. Something a cosplay club could have thrown together. Script is consistent, all the way, in contrary to the Asylums recent "Jack the giant killer". Once I discarded Amstler's chunky acting and the amateuristic cinematography, the movie was really not bad. Was I entertained? Moderately. On a geek level, though.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A deceitful sham
21 March 2013
This movie was made with one purpose: to trick people into buying the DVD/blue-ray of "Jack the giant killer", only to be disappointed it isn't the blockbuster movie "Jack the giant slayer" they thought it was. There cannot have been any other reason or intention for making it because this movie is the very worst of utter crap. It really is just the stolen movie title filled with garbage. However, there is a story in there. It has actors, it has special effects, though extremely bad, appalling, awful. The movie has inconsistency written all over it. Nothing makes any sense, at all. The script, the acting, props, action scenes, - nothing measures up to any standard other than making a buck from stealing the title from a blockbuster by just throwing something together badly without much of a budget. The dinosaur cgi was half decent though. I cannot blame the actors for bad acting, when probably everything was shot in one take. There simply may have been no time or budget to re-do anything. Perhaps the actors were also lured into this sham, ignorant of it's true nature. There should be laws against this shameless deceit. On the other hand, some bad movies - because they were done badly, either for the lack of skill or on purpose - gain a cult status. This one will not.

Just to describe some major issues: Jack, an ordinary kid, is building/finishing some sort of battle robot as in "Avatar". The feet of the thing are shown several times walking on grass, in the opening scene. Clearly, it is just a couple of cardboard boxes with some spray paint. And he's building this thing for what reason? And with what means? No matter, he's got it working right in the nick of time, to kill the giant dinosaur in the end scene. Another delight is the flying castle. The "engine room" is nothing but an old smith's forge with forging tools hanging on the wall. The beans don't add up. Jack receives two beans. Which he throws away into a field (and grow into a beanstalk). Later, his stepsister finds another bean in Jack's jacket, and plants that one. At the very end of the movie, Jack manages to find another one of those beans in his pocket. Even if he threw away only one bean and inconsistently put the other in his pocket, still one extra bean has magically appeared somehow.

As mentioned in the other reviews, the time setting is inconsistent - old cameras and modern helicopters. Well the list is really endless. My conclusion is, that if you have ocd and enjoy counting goof-ups, you might like this movie a lot. Also it might be fun, to try to explain all the apparent inconsistencies.
57 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed