Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Is everybody on crazy pills? This film was HORRIBLE!!!
29 September 2005
I can say with complete confidence that there was almost nothing redeeming about this film. On the basis of the 8.3/10 vote and the positive review on the front page I went and saw A History of Violence last night. The entire theatre was unanimously appalled at, just to name a few, (a) the absurdly superficial and flat character development (e.g. Viggo's character was always either slack jawed and incredulous or viciously violent - his accent also vacillated between his "new" Indiana and "old" Philly accent quite absurdly); (b) the completely undeveloped and unbelievable relationships between the characters (especially between Viggo and his wife); and (c) the EXCRUCIATINGLY SLOW, INFANTILE and LAUGHABLE dialogue (with characters often gritting their teeth and looking on intensely in a supposedly meaningful way). I might also add a completely random and awkward sex scene by Viggo and his wife that just didn't fit at ALL.

I sincerely can't believe that this film has received such a warm reception from film fans. I know that each person has his or her own tastes, but, really, COME...ON! Cronenberg may be a fine director, but this was an effort that should never have seen the light of day, in my view. I will admit that the basic premise is pretty captivating, but the execution was incredibly poor.
18 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Painful
8 April 2005
The absolute only redeeming feature of this film was Will Ferell's Woody impression. But, even that was not particularly compelling (and I'm a huge fan both of Woody Allen and Will Ferrell). The characters in this film, and the dialogue were completely unbelievable and wooden. Names like Ellis Moonsong didn't help. The lines were painfully cheesy, and I really couldn't tell what was particularly funny about the comedy side of the story, nor what was tragic about the tragedy (other than the brutally distancing and boring dialogue). I see the genius in the premise of the film (two parallel versions of the same basic story, one tragic one comic), but it could not have been executed more oafishly. Allen, one of the great comic writers of the twentieth century, has clearly lost touch with reality.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant and Underrated - Not just a "stoner comedy"
19 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was absolutely great. I've watched it about 5 times now over the past few weeks. For all those that love The Big Lebowski, this movie will make a lot of sense. There are loads and loads of memorable lines in the film. Even more interesting was the interesting metaphors about race relations, immigration and assimilation in the US. It seems to me that White Castle (not, in my view, randomly selected as the munchie destination of choice) represented that idealized destination that all those pursuing happiness and the American Dream seek out. A telling moment is where Harold and Kumar, before getting to White Castle, see their Jewish friends Goldstein and Rosenberg happily enjoying their hotdogs in another fast food joint. They gaze longingly at their two friends and Harold says "I want what they have". He elaborates that he means having exactly what you want, not hot dogs per se. You could argue that this was a metaphor for Asian-American and Indian-American first or second generation immigrants looking to Jewish-Americans as examples of a group that came to the US and managed to be admitted to the "White Castle", to assimilate and to ultimately attain the American Dream. I could be way off about this, but it's clear that immigration, assimilation and race-relations is a prominent theme throughout the film. Bottom line, the film is both hilarious, meaningful, and memorable.
22 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed