I can say with complete confidence that there was almost nothing redeeming about this film. On the basis of the 8.3/10 vote and the positive review on the front page I went and saw A History of Violence last night. The entire theatre was unanimously appalled at, just to name a few, (a) the absurdly superficial and flat character development (e.g. Viggo's character was always either slack jawed and incredulous or viciously violent - his accent also vacillated between his "new" Indiana and "old" Philly accent quite absurdly); (b) the completely undeveloped and unbelievable relationships between the characters (especially between Viggo and his wife); and (c) the EXCRUCIATINGLY SLOW, INFANTILE and LAUGHABLE dialogue (with characters often gritting their teeth and looking on intensely in a supposedly meaningful way). I might also add a completely random and awkward sex scene by Viggo and his wife that just didn't fit at ALL.
I sincerely can't believe that this film has received such a warm reception from film fans. I know that each person has his or her own tastes, but, really, COME...ON! Cronenberg may be a fine director, but this was an effort that should never have seen the light of day, in my view. I will admit that the basic premise is pretty captivating, but the execution was incredibly poor.
I sincerely can't believe that this film has received such a warm reception from film fans. I know that each person has his or her own tastes, but, really, COME...ON! Cronenberg may be a fine director, but this was an effort that should never have seen the light of day, in my view. I will admit that the basic premise is pretty captivating, but the execution was incredibly poor.
Tell Your Friends