3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Where is the line drawn?
21 January 2014
The usual reaction from the uninitiated when you tell them you like Star Trek is, why? Some people will just never get it, and while I concede that some people are also in danger of getting it a bit too much, classing Star Trek as just sci fi can mean you miss out on some real gems. I have to confess I'm a sci fi fan, conventions attended by uniform wearing devotees is not really my bag but what I do think is that the genre has offered some of the most profound work that has ever been put on film. The original series suffers a great deal from parody and the fact that like any vision of the future it doesn't age well, but it was a real envelope pusher in it's day, a black female regular cast member at a time of palpable racial tension in the United States is a bold move, having her perform the first interracial kiss on network television is not only bold it's historically important. Using science fiction as a metaphor for relevant issues of the day worked very well, and people dig funny aliens and scantily clad green women. Though far from perfect the series never shied away from a hard story line or controversial character and managed to break barriers on the screen and off it. The two decade interval between the cancellation of the original television show and the revival of the franchise with the Next Generation and it's subsequent off shoots meant that the real world was given a bit of time to catch up to Star Trek's ideals if only in spirit than real action. The producers of the new show (which for a time included Star Trek deus Gene Roddenberry until he went on to the greater adventure) did an amazing job with casting. The original crew had long since been elevated to the pantheon of sci fi gods due to syndicated repeats and the successful movie spin offs and they left some pretty big moon boots to fill, but the newbies were up to the job and within a short time they had amassed their own cult following. In fact the antecedent had a far shorter run and after birthing the superfan it soon ran out of steam. It was then drip fed in to pop culture with animation and feature films. By the end of the eighties the well oiled machine that is American television production focused grouped together a superior sequel. The superior part is of course just my opinion. Most of the aliens were still rather obviously guys in rubber suits, and a shaky camera more than often doubled up as a strike from an enemy vessel. In both series the main cast was anchored by the captain, in the original series William Shatner played Kirk as a louche man of action, who would usually get himself in trouble by disregarding orders and not keeping it in his space trousers. The decision was made for the next captain to be less kinetic and more cerebral and Patrick Stewart was able to imbue Picard with an air of Shakespearean authority. While a classic Kirk episode would involve a punch up, a neurotic but deadly cosmic female in not much clothing and a gorn, Stewart's theatre background allowed classic Picard episodes to become more talky affairs. "Measure of a man" is an almost perfect vehicle to show this off. At the start the Enterprise and her crew are visiting a nice big space station for some essential maintenance, little aware that some old flames and new slimeballs are waiting to disrupt the interstellar harmony aboard ship. In a moment that has viewers thinking that they should just get it on and get it over with, Picard meets up with Captain Phillipa Louvois, a blast from his pre Enterprise past who is now the senior legal officer in that neck of the galaxy and it is established that much tension, sexual and otherwise still exists. Elsewhere an Admiral getting a tour of the federation's flagship nonchalantly gives a transfer order to Brent Spiner's Commander Data, ordering him to report to the robotics laboratory of Brian Brophy's awfully greasy Commander Maddox. When pushed for a little more detail Maddox reveals to Picard that the transfer will involve the dismantling our favorite android with little or no hope of putting the tin man back together. How outrageous. With any serial the writers are able to present us with different scenarios for our fave characters to be tested with each week while staying true to the core themes. A sci fi show can just as easily take the form of a detective drama, or as in this case a courtroom debate. The problem is having a cast talented enough to pull this off and with Star Trek TNG we are very lucky to have justthat. Brent Spiner will forever be in the hearts of innumerable geeks(myself included) as the pale faced golden eyed metal man who wants nothing more than to be what we take for granted, human. He lives life cut off from emotion but manages to teach lessons to one and all from the morally superior high ground one gains through the inability to feel anything.Patrick Stewart is a stage animal, give the man the words and he will make them seem as sent by god, have him argue that an artificial life form is as sentient as you or I and you might not hit your toaster with the same venom you used to next time it burns your crumpets. Add to this the ever classy Whoopie Goldberg drawing some parallels from history to the debate raging today, and a show about aliens becomes an impeccably presented morality play, asking where does the line between service and slavery fall? And they are doing all this on a wicked cool space ship. Awesome.
33 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The King (2005)
8/10
True horror
4 January 2014
Horror films have never really scared me. Seeing some barely clothed teens running the wrong way from a hulking maniac is all good fun but bares little sense of reality. Fire, blows to the head, blasts with high powered fire arms, all these things will actually save you from said maniac in the real world, and even advances in special effects that render on our screens ultra realistic scenes of torture and mayhem do not mess with my sleep pattern, however good and inventive they are (and there are some very clever ones) they remain rooted in fantasy. The King is a different story. There is no giant supernaturally strong Bogie man, no girls in bikinis making idiotic decisions to investigate strange noises, no football players with washboard abs ending up with their innards spilled on the floor, it is much more subtle and unsettling than that, but because of this it ends up being much much scarier. At it's heart the film is a character study, of a deeply flawed character. He has used his own sense of morality to sit as judge and jury on those he believes have committed wrongs either through past mistakes or circumstance of birth. He has decided that these people should be punished, and that he is the perfect instrument to deliver this. At no point in the film is a whizz bang or rubber mask used to ratchet up tension, rather the almost perfect performances from the cast as a whole leave the viewer at once horrified and fascinated. This is true horror, born from lives any one of us could have led, no redemption for abstinence, no last minute escapes. There is no real gore or ultra violence, but the fact this film is planted firmly in reality makes it all the more scary. If horror films have not been doing it for you and have left you feeling less than satisfied take a chance on this film and prepare to be truly disturbed.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Man of Steel (2013)
9/10
As a fan of films not comics I liked it a lot
30 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Making a movie based on a comic book is a double edged sword. On the one hand a ready made canon offers ideas and plots already tested against an audience, on the other hand if you mess with this mythology you may face the ire of a million or more angry keyboards. The Superman franchise has the added problem of an already iconic movie series in its past that will always draw comparisons.(see Bryan Singer)But I am not a comic book fan, and while I love the Donner/Reeve films recent viewings have highlighted the fact that film tech and acting styles for comic book adaptations have moved on significantly since the 1970's, the Dark knight trilogy has set the new gold standard. Superman's reboot had a false start a few years ago with Superman Returns, which suffered because Bryan Singer seemed to hold the previous films in such reverence he didn't seem to be able to cut enough of the cord to make a fresh film and we ended up with a quasi sequel that had serious third act and casting problems. Mr Snyder has opted to start again and we are offered an origin story. Almost everyone (well everyone I know) could tell you something of Superman's origins so a great deal of the accepted mythology must and does appear in the film and technically this is handled with the style and panache audiences have come to expect from film budgets larger than some G.D.Ps, and some scenes are handled quite well as homages to previous efforts rather than parodies, but not much is especially new and in some of the action sequences you really could be watching any of the really muscular guy in tight suit films we have been treated to since Sam Raimi's Spiderman. Plot holes and inconsistencies are fairly minor but I'm sure will annoy a great many,my view is that for all the talk of hyper realism in comic book films these days we are watching a film about an impossibly good looking alien who can fly and shoot lasers from his dreamy eyes so a few bending of the laws of physics and idiotic moves by main characters can be forgiven for rolling the story along. Where Man of Steel really shines is in it's superior casting. Fine actors like Laurence Fishburne, Christopher Meloni and Diane Lane flesh out big characters with small roles with obvious quality,Russell Crowe manages to step out of a Brando shaped shadow and posses Jor El, (a task that even Maximus must have found tough)and Kevin Costner, well he's Kevin Costner and I don't find much wrong with that. At first I was put off a bit by Michael Shannon's rather maniacal turn as Zod but I realised I was comparing him to the quiet menace of Terrence Stamp and taken in context his shouty wild eyed performance is well suited as the foil of Henry Cavill's somewhat reserved Superman. Cavill himself worked incredibly hard to sculpt the body of a Greek god on to a lad from Jersey and he should be commended for it, but aside from the aesthetics he does awfully well to hold his own as a relative newcomer in a film bursting with stars. Finally Amy Adams continues her ever so quiet rise as one of the most dependable and likable female leads in Hollywood. It won't please everyone but I found Man of Steel to be enormous fun and in possession of much more heart than the exalted Dark Knight trilogy.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed