Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Propaganda at its finest.
5 July 2014
You know when a movie made by Christians is about religion, it's going to demonize secularism. It makes out that Morality is entirely exclusive to Christianity and that without God, there is no point in being moral, which is just ridiculous. It makes every non-Christian look either evil or stupid, which is just insulting. It is just propaganda, no way around it, it's trying to make Christianity look perfect when it isn't and it's trying to make secularism and any other religion look evil and immoral. It's almost like this movie was made Christians who knew absolutely nothing about their own faith and of other beliefs. It's a new low for cinema, it's upsetting to think that this movie was allowed to be made.
536 out of 847 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Here Comes Honey Boo Boo (2012–2017)
1/10
Disgusting.
24 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Just looking at Honey Boo Boo makes me want to vomit in my mouth. There is absolutely no reason why anyone should watch this monstrosity of a show. If you watch it because you think they're decent people and lead lives that should be emulated then you should be sterilised and shipped off to Mars. If you are watching this show because you want to laugh at their misfortunes and stupidity, that just makes you a no good bullying thug.

A show about disgusting redneck hillbillies exploiting an obese and bratty redneck child for money is pure evil. Why would anyone think it was a good idea for a show? I would literally prefer to watch a 1 hour PBS special on how grass grows, at least that has some redeemable quality, unlike this s**t stain.
28 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Puss in Boots (2011)
5/10
Good movie, really annoying when thought about
21 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It's a good movie, it was enjoyable and well animated, if it was a stand alone film (as in Shrek didn't exist) then it would be even better. But that is why I only gave it a 5 because it has one of the biggest plot holes I have ever seen in a film.

The premise of the movie is that Puss was wrongfully labelled a criminal and then became an outlaw, and he spends the movie trying to right his wrongs and let everybody know that he is a nice, law abiding cat. So if this is all a prelude to Shrek, and Puss really is a nice guy and doesn't want to break the law and tries so hard to prove his innocence, why does he then become a hit-man? A sellsword if you will?

In Shrek 2, The King hires Puss to kill Shrek, as Puss is the only one who could manage the job. This means that he has been in the industry for quite a while. Meaning that he isn't actually a law abiding cat. This is why I didn't end up liking Puss in Boots.

It was a good film, and as an independent film it would be marvellous, but I just cannot look past this problem, it's like the creators either didn't care enough about their movies to realise this problem, or knew about it but just couldn't care enough to bother changing it.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed