4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Making a Murderer (2015–2018)
10/10
Bone chilling documentary
22 December 2015
I'm speechless, just speechless.

I checked out this documentary because it somehow struck a chord with me in some resemblance of True Detective.

Only thing, this is real, which makes it so much more frightening.

I sat through all episodes on end, while rewinding bits to get details I missed.

Had it been fiction, it would have come off as too far out.

Most engaging and chilling piece of documentary I've ever seen bar none.

I'm still shaken and really disturbed.
126 out of 202 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of Will Ferrells best
15 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I just watched his movie for the second time and it just keeps getting better.

There are no spoilers on the plot in this movie (spoiling the plot it pretty hard) but what kind of movie this is, is something I think people should realize for them selves.

For reference, I love Will Ferrell and think that there's something brilliant in the stupidity of the movies he makes (if that makes any sense).

This is a really difficult film to review, but I think it is a very bold film.

This movie very different from what he normally makes and at first I didn't get the point of the movie.

This movie has no jokes at all and is technically a serious telenovela all in Spanish. It takes a while to get, that the joke is in the details. The plot has no surprises and the very dramatic acting fits very well with the telenovela genre.

The subtlety of comedy in this movie is hilarious. Will Ferrell plays his character very seriously with just a tiny amount of overacting. The filming is on par with general telenovelas just with a few more props mistakes, poorly painted back-drops, back-projections, editing inconsistencies, bad FX, than there normally would be.

The film is a deliberate attempt at making a bad telenovela and there is no classic Will Ferrell about his acting. The only thing classic Will Ferrell is a love scene repeatedly showing his but, which is very funny but actually out of character for the movie.

I think it is a very bold movie, and the fact that it is done purely in Spanish is funny but also moving it far away from mainstream. The somewhat subtle way this movie is deliberately bad is also a very gutsy move. It a very likable trait that it is no way made for the sake of profits.

So can a bad movie be great? Apparently so, and I think this is somehow a brilliant piece comedy art, which made laugh out loud.

This movie is probably going to be very hit or miss for a lot of people, and I expect lot disappointment expecting classic Will Ferrell comedy.

I loved it and writing this review made me want to watch it again to catch even more details.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bankerot (2014–2015)
10/10
Modern urban western about two friends struggling to open their dream restaurant while fighting all sorts of perils
3 January 2015
Let me start by saying that I just love this production. It is a corporation between the national Danish, Swedish and Norwegian TV stations but placed purely in Denmark.

The story evolves around two friends struggling to get their dream restaurant off the ground.

One is a former top (hipster) chef straight out of prison, a ladies man with a drug habit and debt to all the wrong kind of people.

The other is a top sommelier, dyslexic with an alcohol problem mourning his wife who died in a car accident. Since the accident his son has not uttered a word.

It is jam packed with good Danish actors and solid acting, with only a few exceptions. Each and every character is somewhat of a cliché but all are portrayed with nuance and great charisma.

The main storyline is also a bit of a cliché but it is webbed with surprising detours and humorous in its absurdity. However, it is not a comedy as such and the show takes itself seriously. There are no punch-lines or gags, just peculiarities and absurdities that will make you smile.

The show comes across as some kind of modern urban western. It is filmed without the use of nothing but small sets, which gives a great intimacy with the characters and story. The cinematography is really impressive in its purity and with a great grading that fits the western genre. The directing is also very consistent with focus on a good manuscript/story and acting rather than unnecessary bells and whistles.

I have been trying to think of reasons to dislike the show but I just loved every 8 episodes in each of the two seasons. As a bonus the end is both in spirit with the whole show and it also actually works (which I think is rare).

A nice little gem that deserves airtime outside Scandinavia :-)
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not worth watching
14 December 2014
The movie really aggravated me. Enough to make me write my first review on IMDb.

For a frame of reference, let me start by saying that I did enjoy LOTR.

Have you not yet seen The Hobbit 3, just don't !!!!! I simply cannot find a redeeming feature of the film. It's just an unnecessary abundance of establishing shots, excessive CGI and long slow motion close-ups. The close-ups makes everyone understand that the character is thoughtful, very hero-like or the situation is very dangerous. While the accompanying music is good and effective, it is somehow overused, which makes everything even more sickeningly nauseating.

Technically it is not possible write a spoilers for this movie as the plot is virtually non-existent. However, the film is peppered with really bad slapstick goofs, which made me cringe so bad.

The characters are not very likable, which makes the whole outcome unimportant. You feel indifferent about the 7 dwarfs. Bilbo has pretty much been written out of the movie, even though the movie is about him. Legolas is annoying and portrayed as a supernatural matrix-ninja-elf, and it is hard to sit through the movie without wishing him dead. Gandalf is actually likable but the time spent on slow motion closing close-ups is way too much.

I get that the film is not an attempt on documentary, but the special effects in the film are made completely without anything resembling laws of physics. With the Hobbit Peter Jackson suffers from the same disease as George Lucas and Michael Bay, he does not know when to stop with the CGI.

I have seen many bad movies both on television and in the movies, but it's rare that I want to leave the theater. It is also rare that I leave the cinema with a feeling of having wasted my time. Wasting my time is exactly what I did, and even 144 minutes of it. Time that I will never ever get back.

If you are thinking : "I may just catch it on DVD or TV", just don't.

I give it two stars because even though the shots are overwhelmingly cluttered with CGI, some are still quite impressive. Peter Jackson could easily have gotten extra stars had he just included more beautiful shots of landscape without any CGI. He did that well in LOTR.

I can keep on ranting but let this be my last comment: This movie sucks!
59 out of 118 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed