Change Your Image
URBANCREW
Reviews
Sexual Urban Legends (2003)
Funny !!!
4 urban legends.
- Dad returned ! - the sexual abuse - Picture memory - Mom plays with the spoon
Very Funny ! It's a small pleasant film with sex... and pretty actors. The actors are cool. I liked this movie.
I like the legend with the toothbrushes ! Very cool !
A porn movie gay simple and sympathetic ! An hysterically funny but incredibly steamy collection of urban legends. Not the scary, bloody ones, but the funny ones that involve sex in some way, given a gay hardcore spin !
Watch it if you can :p
Urban Legends: Bloody Mary (2005)
French review
Good I waited one week for digesting well the famous movie by MARY LAMBERT. The post-scream was beautiful and is well finished. Wes Craven collected well besides with its step very famous Cursed. Who could have thought that the opus Urban legend, would be again with the style of the day ? Who could have imagined that the realization was entrusted to Mary Lambert, and the screenplay written by Misters Dan Harris and Michael Dougherty (Xmen 2, Xmen 3 and Superman Returns).
Surprised, amazement.... How as many charismatic names could take part well in a succession of two films which only garnered, in all and for all, not more than 94 millions dollars throughout the world? Two films considered to be bad from a general point of view.
The story : In 1969, a girl is violated then assassinated by her boy friend. The years pass and a legend "Bloody Mary" is built on this murder remained to hide by the assassin. Alternatives of this history are known by all one each one throughout the world.... Moreover become legend, "It is told that if one pronounces three times the name of bloody Mary, in a mirror, this one would come to check if you do not form part of the children's of the culprits who carried out it to his death...." This famous legend will cause the attention of three girls, excluded from the ball of the college, of a small city of Utah. They go to sing it one evening of full moon.
There are two references to preceding films. The first, when Heather breaks the glass i. This scene resembles that of glass with Sasha, in first film. The second, Buck looks at the TV in the motel's room. It acts of an erotic scene resulting from second film.
Well, Urban legend 3: Bloody Mary acted like an outsider in this firm revealed by Scream. But let us point out it, this firm with the characteristic not to have direct after-effects of the same action. One discovers with each new opus a new history. Not killer masked here, place with supernatural, the ghost of Bloody Mary (Lilith Fields) acted with pure sadism on the children's. Two murders will remain memorable (Heather and spiders, Buck and the thing under its bed) The urban legends are well controlled and exploited in the design of the terrifying murders, some examples: - "People can lick too", - "The story of the U.V beds", - "Spiders hidden in the room".
The film that I classify as horror film is tinted of a very pretty history of "Rape and Revenge from hell", the Seventies and Eighties marked the kind....
Lambert delivers a result to us which in more of connecting the covering references cool to the Masters of horrors (Lucio Fulci, Dario Argento) manages to impose a quite glaucous environment and a mystery in the first part. Part centralized besides on the topic "Rape and revenge from hell", we follow late Mary tortured the children's of those which assassinated it. Rare are the scenes to know an effect as scared as what us Lambert proposes. Meir Zarchi with its "I spit on your grave" (Day of the woman) managed to show us realism, the suffering, and revenge orchestrated by a corrupted young woman. Here, Lambert films in its turn a considered revenge. An organized revenge occupying itself one by one of the children's of most idiot to the rebel. Lilith Fields, the face ravaged, acted like Camille Keaton full with hatred and/or its only motivation is to be avenged for the evil (rape and death for this one) which was inflicted to him. Mary which tints side of Carrie when it is a question of punishing.
The second part rocks in the thriller. The heroes know now the evil which surrounds them, and seek the solution to escape from it. Place then at discovered of the mysterious killer of Mary. Mary besides becomes even wiser in this second part. It finds the innocence and brittleness discovered in the introduction. One second part already considering, but the five last minutes are worth the turning, the discovery of the mysterious killer will draw your attention.
Other interesting strong elements.... contrary to the slashers series and other sequels..... The screenplay writers worked the characters who very quickly become complex and strong interesting. By this principle, the film reached the dramatic kind. The psychology of the people reaches even the fact that one badly had to think that it acted of a horror film.
The original band composed by Jeff Rona is quite simply great. Light, soft, one listens to with pleasures the notes which are accentuated with the arrival of Mary.
The make-up are very beautiful, very realistic.... All are carried out by the technicians of 2001 maniacs. Moreover, the make-up men do not forget to divert the public using gore effects (blood, damaged bodies, tripe....) and of shivers (the face of Mary). Mary with however some features of Reagan (the exorcist) but here no relationship with film of Friedkin.
The made up casting actors and unknown actors is however very well. All are on the one hand beautiful, but good interpreters... A thought with Michael Coe and Kate Mara (Nip/Tuck, Brokeback Mountain) which one will find very soon in new productions. To note, the guest stars of sexy erotic actress ANN POLL in film (it holds a short role) and of the kid which played in Leprechaum, Brandon Sachs.
Extremely interesting, really damage which it released on direct to DVD. I think that more one will be happy to find the genius which MARY LAMBERT had already to release during its film PET SEMETARY.
Great, interesting, a treat.... I advise it to you.