Reviews

19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
When Did Murder Become Cool?
14 February 2006
When Devil's Rejects predecessor House of 1000 Corpses was released in 2003, it shone out so gruesomely and bizarrely that director and writer Rob Zombie couldn't fail to make a sequel to it.

Having seen Devil's Rejects before being brave enough to set eyes on the first film, I can whole-heartedly admit that I was truly in awe of the whole film.

The fantastically ironic soundtrack recorded by Zombie himself and very creepy portrayals of the main characters from the lead actors were brilliant.

The film, as anyone who's seen House… will know, follows the Firefly family, a group of relatives who all share a penchant for murder, torture and brutality, a family who have murdered many innocent victims heartlessly just for kicks.

Sheriff Wydell is on the war-path with the sole purpose of hunting down the family and making them suffer for the death of his brother. A man who strongly believes in the 'eye for an eye' saying, he will stop at nothing until he's found the Firefly family - dead or alive.

Devil's Rejects is no way near as trippy as House of 1000 Corpses, Dr. Satan goes by the wayside and while House… seems to play on the audiences fear of the unknown supernatural, Rejects seems to have a whole new take on what is scary - relentless torture, done in a matter-of-fact way.

Bill Mosely as in House… is fantastic and this time, having made Sheri Moon his wife, Zombie gives her a bigger and more powerful part in Devil's Rejects and she doesn't fail to give possibly one of the most deranged performances of last year.

Devil's Rejects is not as 'Texas Chain Saw Massacre' as House of 1000 Corpses, and this being his second film Rob Zombie has learnt how to terrify an audience, but at the same time offers some dark, clever humour and brilliantly juxtaposed music that makes Devil's Rejects one hell of a cool horror film, that I recommend to anyone with a strong stomach.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Donnie Darko (2001)
7/10
Über Cool Teenage Angst.
14 February 2006
Donnie Darko has become a sell-out hit amongst angst-ridden/fashionably uncool/persistently 'individual' teenagers the world over, primarily down to its slit-your-wrists soundtrack 'Mad World' Its 'über-clever' plot twist and freak out scenes remind us kids just how terrible our own lives are and make us want to be as insane as the title character.

Donnie Darko is a troubled, but undeniably clever young high schooler, not only traumatised by the usual teenage worries, but by a six foot bunny rabbit named Frank who tells him when the world will end.

Superbly talented Jake Gyllenhaal again impresses with his creepy, somewhat sinister portrayal of Darko and shows us just how evil he can look by staring crazily into a mirror.

However clever the writer/director Richard Kelly wanted it to be, it's still a teenage film. Most people over the age of 25 will deem it 'self loving' and 'ostentatious' but unfortunately few people under the age of 18 will actually understand what this film is all about.

Donnie is troubled and meant to relate to us as an audience, and Gyllenhaal as always does that superbly, perhaps his talent was over-shadowed by the films overly pretentious ending.

Donnie Darko's blink and you miss 'em jokes and dark humour might be wasted on some people who are wanting laugh out loud gags, which they aren't going to find in this film.

If you're thinking of slitting your wrists Donnie Darko will only remind you of how awful the world is and how little you actually mean to anyone - so give it a miss.

If you're looking for a light little piece of cinema to entertain you one evening, you might be shocked to find that Donnie Darko requires some thinking and might just root up some unanswered questions about your life - so give it a miss.

If you're immune to psychological hallucinations and become freaked out easily then Donnie Darko might just terrify you - so give it a miss.

If on the other hand, you're in for a little 'deep thinking' and want to be moved, then Donnie Darko is the perfect film for you, and will give you some wonderful topics of conversation over the coming months.

If you like your 'indie-cool' flicks with clever plot-twists and meaningful scenes of silence then this film will open your eyes to how a slight pause here and a little look there can create a whole lot more than reels and reels of drivelling script.

If you have a slightly odd sense of humour and are fed up of the 'Frat Pack' comedies like Anchor Man and Wedding Crashers then this little gem will take you away from the gags and offer you a darkly humorous, intelligently funny film.

If you're a fan of any of the (surprisingly) star-studded cast including a fantastic Patrick Swayze and a slightly weird Drew Barrymore then that won't fail to delight.

Or if, as most self-acclaimed fans of this movie will be, you just want to join the ranks of pro-mainstream teens who think they're making a bold statement of their intelligence and individuality by listing Donnie Darko as one of their favourite films, then watch it. You might ask what the fuss is about, or you might just end up being in awe of this film, which under all the fuss and hype is a frighteningly beautiful and well-acted piece of teenage angst.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Stuff of Nightmares.
14 February 2006
Made more than three decades ago there was uproar when Texas Chain Saw Massacre was released to an unwitting public and brazenly re-wrote horror movie clichés as we know them.

Where it wasn't severely cut, it was banned and for the do-gooding moral crusaders who fought against its vulgar corruption of decency and ethical-boundary pushing, their plan backfired, making Texas Chain Saw Massacre one of the most infamous, sought-after and well acclaimed horror films of all time.

Still as unsettling today as I'm sure it was back in 1973, Texas Chain Saw Massacre's brilliantly original plot still shines just as boldly, brazenly and bloody as ever.

Chain Saw Massacre single-handedly changed horror for a generation, and I can safely say that there's not one film out there that hasn't be influenced by Tobe Hooper's shoe-string masterpiece. It's surprising to know that it was started for little over $60,000 - a task which would be impossible to accomplish in this day and age.

This low budget classic has a true gritty quality to it, it's presumably unintentionally grainy filming and shaky camera work, just adds to the white-knuckle tension and its pretty basic sets are perfectly suited to what this film is all about.

As most will know this film follows a group of young kids on their way to visit their grandfather's grave. They soon run in to trouble when they pick up a deranged hitchhiker, played awesomely by Edwin Neal and consequently stumble across the original House of 1000 Corpses. What follows it sure to be a delight to any true horror fan and is certainly the stuff of nightmares.

The fantastic Gunnar Hansen is superbly suited to the role of Leatherface, and a truly terrifying villain. He's no Freddie Krueger who gets up after being killed, he's a real guy with a real determination and his relentlessness is what makes the film so horrifying. Texas Chain Saw Massacre is a brilliant visual feast of all that is right about the horror genre, but perhaps more famously remembered for its audio gross-outs. No doubt the most 'gore-free' horror film which cleverly has you thinking you've just witnessed a bloodbath of flesh and guts. In fact you see barely any blood, but it's fantastic sound FX, just go to show how sound can trigger that all uncomfortable memory deep within you. Which is always more terrifying than anything seen on screen.

Also, ultimate praise for possibly the most awkward dinner scene ever put onto film and for its truly unique and brilliant characters that were invented before they became your staple horror movie cast.

All in all, Texas Chain Saw Massacre is still the undisputed King of all that is Sick and Disturbing; a little gem that still shines thirty years after is unintentionally well-publicised release and a well renowned story-line that radiates originality, terror and stunning balls-out fear.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Four Brothers (2005)
10/10
Marky Mark and His 'Funky Bunch' Do Us Proud...
20 January 2006
If you'd have told me this time last year I would have ended up waiting for the DVD release of a 'Detroit Massive' style film with Mark Wahlberg, the dude from Outkast and Paul Walker's mate from '2 Fast, 2 Furious' I'd have thrown my popcorn in your face and laughed. Very loudly.

Oh how wrong I was. I was dragged to see this film, against my will, but as soon as the film started and I started digging that Motown soundtrack I was captured.

The story follows four adopted brothers (Wahlberg, Andre Benjamin, Tyrese Gibson and Garrett Hedlund) who return the their hometown of infamous Detroit to avenge their murdered mothers death.

Wahlberg is very good. I've over-looked him in the past, but his hard-man act in life transpires perfectly on screen and his famous 'school of hard knocks' stamp, works very well. Wahlberg plays Bobby Mercer, the elder of the four brothers, but not the most responsible. Bobby, the hot-head of the Mercer family is constantly pulling out guns on trouble-makers, much to the dismay of sensible, family orientated Jeremiah (played, surprisingly by Andre Benjamin/3000 A.K.A the lead from Outkast) Jeremiah, is the sensible younger brother, the one who's stayed loyal to his roots in Detroit and set up a family with reliable, rational wife, Camille. Tyrese Gibson plays army Jarhead Angel, more likely to adhere to his girlfriends wishes than anyone elses. The youngest of the four, and the brother who is the butt of most of the films hilarious jokes is Garrett Hedlund, who plays Jack and consequently spurs a ton of 'is he/isn't he gay' posts up here on IMDb.

The film is very, very well written by David Elliot and Paul Lovett and includes some very hilarious one-liners (mainly from Wahlberg) and at the same time creates an interesting and touching brotherly intimacy that films like these often leave out in fear of 'offending' the big tough 'boyz from da hood.'

Director John Singleton does an amazing job, we get four superb and extremely different characterisations from the great actors leading the show and watch out for the car chase scene (Singleton does them oh-so well) as it is one of the best in film history!

All in all this film is wonderfully lead by Marky Mark who gains a whole new 'Funky Bunch' in Four Brothers and although it appears to most as a 'mans-film' don't let that put you girls off. The family network is superb and you can always sit there debating on which brother you like best…

A surprising personal hit of 2005 (which was a bad year for films I must say) and was defiantly in my top ten. An under-rated piece of cinema that will never get the acclaim it deserves, but will sit well with most people who venture to see it, be if for the action, humour or lets be frank - good looks of the Mercer Brothers.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cabin Fever (2002)
7/10
Not Quite 'Last House...' But Up The Same Street...
20 January 2006
It should be obvious to everyone by now that there hasn't been a gory, unabashed horror film for a long time. During the 80s, the 'Video Nasties' were on the rise, 'Evil Dead' and 'Last House on the Left' were all met with a icy reception from up-tight, Left-wing campaigners and consequently banned.

Director/writer Eli Roth is obviously a big fan of these slasher flicks and he knows his horror films from the looks of his debut 'Cabin Fever'.

Written back in 1995, Roth wanted this little number to hark back to the Dario Agento and early Wes Craven era and with due respect to the guy he's almost there.

'Cabin Fever' tells the story of five college students who rent a cabin in the woods for a week (they should have turned back when they realised that said cabin passes quite a resemblance for the legendary 'Evil Dead' cabin, but hey... this is a horror film!) It's not long before the kids are getting themselves into trouble and building animosity between them and the local inbreds, but as all teenagers do they take the troubles in their stride.

Although a log cabin in the woods of some out-of-the-way town might be an all too obvious setting for a horror film, it works well. Sometimes the clichés need to be there.

Roth builds up a very comic script, which makes it a pleasure to watch during the beginning stages unlike a lot of other horror films that take so long for any action to start that by the time it does, you've lost all interest.

'Cabin Fever' however takes you along with the gross-out gore and "crude" jokes and by the last fifteen minutes you kind of "get" what Roth is trying to achieve. While wanting to scare the pants off his audience and gross them out completely the guy wants to make us laugh as well. Whether or not the humour transpires to all people is obviously questionable, but on a minuscule budget of around $1,000,000 the film does very well.

I love a low-budget horror, and these days it's hard to find one, but Cabin Fever (along with recent psycho hit Saw) is an example of how money can't buy you talent. Roth does more with 'Cabin Fever' and a million bucks than other directors can do with $30,000,000 and if you're a fan of 80s slasher flicks that this is a must. It might not measure up to 'Last House…' and 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre', but in this day and age, it comes pretty damn close.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Saved By The Belle... Just.
18 January 2006
However much I wanted to love this film, I couldn't help walking out of the cinema feeling ever so slightly disappointed. By far the most bizarre film so far, Niel Jordon tries desperately to make this a funny, light hearted film about Irish transvestite Patrick 'Kitten' Braden and succeeds - but only just.

Certainly the most thrilling part of this film is the obscenely beautiful Cillian Murphy, who takes a big step down from his bad-guy roles and steps into the sparkly, high-heeled shoes of the exceedingly strange, and slightly simpering Kitten.

Having been abandoned by his mother as a baby, Patrick/Kitten realises he's not like all the other boys in school and has a penchant for dressing up in his adoptive mothers dresses and make-up.

Brendan Gleeson is superb as the foul-mouthed, drunken Womble, but unfortunately Gleeson is one of the only great bits of comedy in this film.

I'll back up Murphy's role as great, however it would have been nice to be able to take Kitten a little bit more seriously than we could and I'm sure I'd have felt a little more empathy for her had she not been so simpering. A very brave career move however for Murphy himself and after roles in films like '28 Days Later' and 'Red Eye' it does show-off his diverse acting talents. Did he deserve a Golden Globe Nomination? No. But did he fit the role well? Yes. I don't know another man more perfect for it.

It's certainly Murphy who saves this film - but how far a movie can go on the looks of its androgynous leading actor is questionable.
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jarhead (2005)
8/10
When the going gets tough...
15 January 2006
It's true to say that Brit director Sam Mendes has dazzled us, over the years with some truly fabulous pieces of cinema and with Jarhead, he doesn't fail to wow his audience... again.

As practically the only female in the cinema, I was in awe of the darkly humorous script and great breakdown-of-sanity acting by the fabulous Jake Gyllenhaal.

Jarhead is helped along by a great cast of actors, including Jamie Foxx as the ever-so enthusiastic Staff Sgt. Sykes, and a brilliantly mellow Peter Sarsgaard as the one who flips out at the end.

This film tells of the boredom of the Gulf War. The American troops are in the desert for almost six months and not-so slowly we see our main character, Swoff (Gyllenhaal) losing his marbles.

I truly believe that Gyllenhaal is one of American's most promising and talented young actors and I certainly hope that his very different roles in Brokeback Mountain and Jarhead take this fabulous actor on to much bigger and better things.

The film offers some unusual insight into the sheer boredom the Marines experience whilst awaiting some field action. There's a fabulous scene between nerdy Fergus and Swoff, in which Gyllenhaal again shows his amazing credibility as an actor and we get some real emotion from the two guys. Perhaps the best breakdown of the mental state in a while.

All in all a great little war film, an unusual take on what most directors cloud with politics is in fact an unpolitical, brazen and interesting movie, littered from beginning to end with real, dark humour that even the most intelligent of you will be sniggering along with.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Real "Love Story"...
12 January 2006
If you're going to put two attractive male actors on a beautiful backdrop of mountain scenery and tell them to get it on, it's always going to be a winner - this was at least my opinion on 'Brokeback Mountain' before I watched it the other night. And I was right - as I suspected.

All too often does Hollywood present a 'more than perfect' insight into relationships, painting over the ugly parts and restricting any audience empathy. This film breaks all the rules but along the way redefines them with such grace that should be credited and admired.

'Brokeback Mountain' tells the often heartbreaking, continuously touching story of two seemingly reserved Southern American guys who find love in the stunning Brokeback Mountain of Wyoming.

The many people who have referred to this as 'The Gay Cowboy Movie' could not be more wrong. Brokeback serves as so much more than that and offers an insight into the perils of homosexual relationships in the mid sixties where when you were 'gay' you were happy.

This film offers few rays of happiness however for the two lead characters Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal) and Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger) as they battle with their feelings for each other over the course of a twenty year affair.

Ennis and Jack meet whilst herding sheep up on Brokeback and one drunken - and freezing cold night, Ennis is forced to take shelter in the tent with Jack.

The highly talked about 'gay love' scenes are not nearly as scandalous as people (mainly strongly-heterosexual males) make out and Ang Lee presents pure lust, aggression and passion in just a few short seconds of footage.

Gyllenhaal and Ledger star perfectly alongside each other in what might just be their 'career defining moment' and I truly doubt they will walk away from the major awards shows this year empty-handed. Both characters deliver some great lines, which will be quoted for a long time and a special mention should go out to the tear-jerking speech Jack gives on realising that love isn't as perfect - or as easy as the fairy tales tell you.

The perfect script serves the film brilliantly and it is obvious that much love and time has gone into making it into a touching and sensitively shattering piece of writing.

Perhaps I'm too sentimental, or perhaps Lee really does work that hard at pulling on the heartstrings of the audience, and what comes of it is pure, unadulterated emotion.

Brokeback Mountain was always destined for success. When you have two such complex and superbly in-depth characterisations from the leading men and a very strong supporting cast it's always going to do well. The amazing direction from Lee and a more than perfect script all contribute to what I hope is going to be the film to sweep up at the Oscars.

Never before have I been so moved by a film, and never before has a piece of cinema lingered on my mind for so long. It's true to admit that every once in a while a movie can come along and, believe me - it will change your perceptions on a lot of issues.

My final tip? Take your tissues, 'cause you're sure as hell are going to need them.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
He's right... the Bogeyman IS real...
4 January 2006
I saw Devil's Rejects this summer and I've got to admit, I quite liked it. It was sadistic and stuck two fingers up at the suffering audience. I bought House of 1000 Corpses off the back of Devil's Rejects not really knowing what to expect.

This story tells the gruesome tale of two young couples who are travelling across the States. One fateful night they stumbled across Captain Spaulding's Museum of Monsters and Mayhem, and enchanted with the museum go off to find the mythical legend of Doctor Satan, a notorious figure in the neighbourhood but also a full-time sadistic, malevolent torturer. Picking up the beautiful Baby (played ever so psychotically by Sherri Moon) on the way the couples soon find themselves with a bit of tyre trouble (as you always do in the middle of the night, in the middle of the woods, in the middle of no-where) and take shelter in Baby's family home.

Her family are creepy enough as it is and this is even before the fun begins.

Zombie leads us through this film on a dizzying, almost LSD induced trip of brutal torture and graphic suffering. But don't we just love it?

Otis (Bill Molesly) the brother of the family delivers some pretty upbeat, darkly humorous lines throughout the movie and the ending, although slightly psychotic and definitely messed up, makes for some entertaining viewing.

Yes, this film made me turn by head in disgust and clench my muscles in shock, but never failed to entertain me all the way.

Believe me, after watching this, you'll be thankful for such a 'normal' family.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
King Kong (2005)
2/10
Hurry up and die already...
19 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I drew the line at Lord of the Rings. I'm not a fan of hobbits/elves/mythical legends or Peter Jackson for that matter. Just because my friends love the Trilogy DOESN'T mean that I want to pretend to be interested in such rubbish.

King Kong though caught my eye. I hate monkeys, especially large monkeys like Kong, but I could handle that; the monkey aspect I could ignore... Until I realised one horrifying, terrifying fact...

...This film was THREE HOURS LONG...

I wanted to be shot an hour into the film. There was no action and you had to get a huge sob story from the oh so unfortunate, oh so beautiful Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts) which just didn't wash with me at all. None of the characters were particularly endearing.

I'm a fan of Jack Black, I think he's really cool, but I couldn't help thinking that after delivering his lines he would launch into 'Tribute'...

The action bits were good. I liked the Bug Scene and was rooting for the dinosaurs.

However: 1. The natives weren't explained. Why? Who? What? How? 2. You reckon Kong could defeat a T. Rex?! No way. 3. Billy Elliot shooting bugs off Adrian Brody with what seemed to me like a MACHINE gun and not killing him! 4. Ann Darrow should be locked up. The ape was a killing machine, love! He had to die sooner or later. 5. Ann on top of the Empire State in the middle of winter. I've been up there. She'd have been blown off the top. For sure. 6. How in holy Jesus' name did they transport a 25ft gorilla to New York on that tiny little boat? Nicely dodged there, Jackson.

I hated the film. I strongly advise people NOT too see it. Tens of millions of dollars were seemingly wasted on this very boring film. Just because Jackson is directing doesn't make it good.

This film has little saving grace, and the cast and crew must be thankful that film journalists are clueless as to what makes a truly great, action epic.
18 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautifully Sinister
21 November 2005
All Dogs Go To Heaven is on a par with Watership Down for scary kiddies films. Both were dark and pretty sinister, but at the same time the most mesmerising experience a child can have. This was one of my favourite films as a kid. I was in love with Charlie and at the tender age of about five or six, I'll admit... I had a crush on a cartoon dog. All Dogs tells the dark story of lovable cad Charlie and his partner in crime Itchy. The story starts with Charlie escaping from death row and swaggering off to the nearest club to do some gambling. Of course, as a child, I didn't understand the concept of this film. I loved the songs and the animation but as I've got older I do begin to wonder why I wasn't disturbed by this film as a youngster. It deals with pretty adult themes --- gambling, murder, hell and prison but in a world of goody-goody Disney films, it's something every child should watch once.

Yes, there's some sort of crazy transvestite crocodile scene and the hell scenes scare me more now that when I was little, but it delivers such a poignant message that should not be ignored by parents!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Saw II (2005)
10/10
You saw Saw, now see Saw II
31 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I've been a fan of Saw since I watched the DVD about a year ago. The movie is one to grab your attention and hold on to it, until way after the film has finished. I really did think the first one was a work of genius and that the writers were very, very clever in having me fooled for the whole time. Maybe the reason that I'm going to rate this film so highly is that fact that I so enjoyed the bloody, gory torture of Adam and Dr. Lawrence Gordon. Even though reviews have slated Saw II, I do truly believe that it's one of, if not the, best sequel ever!

Oh yes,there will be blood Jigsaw warns at the beginning of this film and oh yes, he doesn't lie! This time, Jigsaw is back, and yes - he's still wearing that ghastly serial killer cloak. But don't let that image soften you - he's still deadlier and messed up as ever. This time, instead of leaving two strangers in a bathroom together and telling them to kill each other, he's locked a lot of strangers in a house together and told them they're going to die anyway.

However, in true Jigsaw style he's given them a chance to redeem themselves, they can escape with their lives, but only if they deserve it. Donnie Wahlberg plays crooked cop Eric Matthews, who goes along to investigate the crime scene of an unfortunate victim of Jigsaws, quickly noticing that perhaps he's connected to the killer in more ways than he'd like to think... He's called out to raid Jigsaw lair, and this is when the film really begins - Matthew's realises that his son is one of Jigsaw's unlucky victims and as he and the S.W.A.T team watch the slow demises of the house's occupants he is powerless to help. This film concentrates more on Jigsaw rather than the victims who he's putting through their paces but still is only a wee bit less gruesome than it's predecessor. The film is great, right up until the end when the film become absolutely fantastic! Prepare yourself to the best twist, since Saw!

I strongly advise you to see Saw, before you see Saw II, just so you can understand the true and absolute horror of the ending. I was climbing up my seat and gasping in shock and I warn you - I've never been so shocked by a few lights going on in my whole, entire life.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Night Watch (2004)
3/10
The Matrix's Geekier, Russian Cousin
27 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The trailer to this film made Night Watch or 'Nochnoy Dozor' as the Russians say, look, in a word, stunning. The CGI was very impressive and the outstanding visuals roared by before a background of searing rock-music. The story looked interesting and unusual and all in all, this trailer radiated COOL. I rushed along to the cinema to watch it on opening night. NO! I didn't care that it was in Russian, the film looked so good that I could deal with those subtitles... Oh, how wrong I was. The film, to me at least would have made no sense unless I'd scrutinised the screen, read quicker than light, whilst watching the actors on screen *and* doing an awful lot of thinking. After about an hour my head was hurting and my eyes becoming lazy.

Night Watch is the story of a group of goodies, battling against a group of baddies, desperately trying to save the world from the evil forces that the bad men from Day Watch possess.

The main character Anton, played very well by Konstantin Khabebsky is an ordinary guy, he decides at the beginning of the film that he wants to kill his cheating wife's unborn baby, to do this he does what anyone else would do in his situation, and asks a crazy old witch from a group of old, raven invested flats that I'm sure his Mama would have told him not to go near. This beginning scene is long; too long. There's an awful lot to understand and at the end of it, the Night Watch arrive and realise that Anton has 'special powers' --- I almost expected Trinity and Morpheus to make an appearance.

The likeness to The Matrix is slim at first... but grows with time. It's the same kind of story about a normal guy, suddenly being thrust into a supernatural world he had no idea existed until now and having to deal with his own demons while trying to save the world from almost certain destruction.

Back to the story; Anton kills a vampire (naughty, naughty) and the said vampires girlfriend, grief stricken, tries to attack Anton's twelve year old son (the one he tried to kill at the beginning.) Realising this is his son, Anton tries everything he can to save him from her clutches, but fails... miserably. It just so happens that Anton's miracle son also has powers (well I never!), but unfortunately is told that his dad was the one who tried to kill him when he was still a little foetus and he quickly decides to join the Day Watch... all left open for a nice little trilogy!!

It's predictable, if well acted by Khabensky, but director Timur Bekmambetov tries too hard with the CGI. In small doses it's amazingly impressive, but throughout a whole movie, it gives you a headache. In the ending scenes, the camera was moving all over the place in an attempt to impress and all it made me want to do is shut my eyes.

I'll give the trailer credit, I still think that the trailer is amazing, great music, great visuals, greater special FX, but the film just seemed like it was trying to hard. I know this is Russia's first major film! It's a great defeat that it reached Hollywood and I desperately want to praise it, but Russia! You don't need to include over-the-top visuals, shaky camera work and weirdo scenes to show yourselves to be good film-makers!! Calm down on the CGI front and it could have been impressive. Let professionals film it, instead of looking like its filmed by a drunken two-year old and you could have had a great, classic film. Instead, disappointing. I'm sorry NightWatch, you're just the Matrix, but with a bit less cool.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Burton's Flirtin' with magic again...
27 August 2005
Even from when I was a little girl in pyjamas and clutching a teddy called Edward, I've loved Tim Burton. He made even the scariest of childhood nightmares magical and with a little sprinkle of that Tim Burton magic dust he made, for me at least, the screen come alive. At around five I saw Edwards Scissorhands, my first run in with Burton. And I admit, I had quite the crush on Mr. Scissorhands himself! All my bears were called Edward and had paper talons selotaped to their paws, thus resulting in me getting paper cuts during the nights - but I didn't care;I was young and in love. At the dawn of my 18th birthday, Charlie and the Chocolte Factory returns to our screens. Bigger, brighter and a wee bit more sinister than the 70s version, Willy Wonkas Chocolate Factory. Burton returns to magical form directing this very, very good film. For those of you who'll have not been living in a cave for the past 40 or so years, you'll know the story. Chalie Bucket is a poor little boy who lives in a fabulously crooked house with wonky doors, crazy windows and equally crazy grandparents. Despite his lack of money, little Charlie loves his parents more than most, and it seems that this is his enduring feature that ultimately lets him win the final golden ticket. No surprises there. The magic really starts when Charlie and his grandfather (his chosen guardian, bless him!) enter the factory. The first time we come face to face with Johnny Depp, as the great chocolatier is, in itself a great bit of cinematography. Hilariously funny and ever-so-slightly creepy. As you follow the sticky demises of the 4 other golden ticket winners, you begin to be rooting for these children's deaths! Harsh I know, but they're all so horribly spoilt, fat, rude and violent-obsessed that you want them to be taught a lesson! As with all films like these, alls well that ends well, but not without a little bit of trouble, of course! As always Burton delivers his great adventure of a film very well indeed, helped along enormously by Mr. Depp and the brilliant Freddie Highmore as little Charlie Bucket. The other kiddies are brilliant too. All in all a fantastic family film that anyone can enjoy. No-matter what age you pretend to be!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Saw (2004)
10/10
Double Act 'Play A Game' With Innocent Heads.
7 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Having read numerous reviews for 'Saw' I've discovered that it's a bit like 'Marmite'; you either love it or you hate it. But c'mon! What's not to love. Aussie double act James Wan (director) and Leigh Whannel (screen-writer/"Adam") present to us something I don't think has been done this successfully in years. 'Saw' won me over the first time I saw it, with its creepy story-line and bizarre camera angles and it's grown in my estimation over the course of the years.

Saw starts when Adam (Leigh Whannell) awakes in a bathtub to find himself chained up in a darkened room and very confused. When the lights go on his cell-mate Dr. Lawrence Gordon (Cary Elwes) is revealed to him as well as the dead body of a man, a gun in one hand and a tape recorder in the other. As Lawrence and Adam start talking, clues are revealed to them. They both find tapes in their pockets, each carrying a sinister message and a task they must complete to escape with their lives. Adam's task is to save his own life, and not to sit back and watch himself die. Lawrence's task is to kill Adam; the consequence if he doesn't is that his wife and child will die. Lawrence begins to tell the story of Jigsaw, a serial killer who captures the morally wayward, in life or death situations, intended to make them appreciate their own mundane lives. Adam and Lawrence are not Jigsaw's first victims, he's targeted self-harmers, drug addicts and benefit frauds and now, seemingly innocent Adam and do-gooding Dr. Lawrence are victims in his next game. Clues are revealed to the two characters as they are revealed to the audience, we find out that Lawrence has been cheating on his wife and that Adam has been paid to take pictures of him by obsessed ex-leading detective on the Jigsaw case, David Tapp (Danny Glover). Meanwhile, as Adam and Lawrence are being held captive in a bathroom, Lawrence's wife and daughter are being terrorised by creepy Zep Hindle (Michael Emerson) a quiet janitor in Lawrence's hospital. Eventually, Lawrence's time runs out, Adam is still alive and Zep leaves the Gordon's to carry out his work and go and kill Lawrence, pursued by the ever observant Tapp. As the story unfolds and Lawrence's situation becomes more desperate he takes drastic measures to release himself from his chains. Zep and Tapp, brawl in the tunnels which lead to the room in which Adam and Lawrence are trapped, which results in a fast-paced action and Tapp's murder. As Zep enters the bathroom, the gruesome finale climaxes in a terrifying twist - and trust me, you'll be screaming as loudly as the characters on screen.

Altogether a very well brought together film, which exceeded my expectations and shows Whannell and Wan as the true geniuses they deserve to be credited as.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ghost (1990)
8/10
Now do ya believe in Ghosts?
8 June 2005
I first saw this film when I was about 11 and loved every single aspect of it. To me, it was just what a film should be - heartbreaking, funny, spooky and thought provoking. Patrick Swayzee lead a great cast into what was about the best film of 1990, with the oh-so-memorable 'clay scene' it couldn't fail to be a very, very good film. Swayzee play Sam Wheat a very much in love man, who's life is tragically cut short by his nasty friend Carl (Tony Goldwyn). Too scared to 'step into the light' Sam stays on earth and soon befriends crooked Oda Mae (Whoopie Goldburg) who suddenly finds out her talents for talking to the dead are actually for real. Sam spends much of the film trying to contact distraught girlfriend Molly, who he's left behind and believe me, the ending calls for a very big box of Kleenex!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's All Gone Pretty Well
8 June 2005
Considering the beating this film got in some reviews, I went to see it the other day, not expecting much from it. Surprisingly though, the film was pretty damn good! Paul Kaye (some of you will remember his often hilarious Dennis Pennis taking the mickey out of celebrities at film premiers) plays Frankie Wilde a mega famous DJ who's bringing dance music to Ibiza. All's going well for Frankie, he's rich, successful, has a wife and a string of sexy ladies on the side. All this goes down the drain when Frankie starts to lose his hearing, which of course, is not that good for a famous DJ. Kaye delivers some funny, upbeat lines throughout the film and so long as you don't mind his gurning for laughs, you'll enjoy the flick. Despite his arrogance and dirty coke and drink habits you find yourself cheering Frankie along and when he meets Spanish lip-reader Penelope you almost want him to get his hearing back for good. Although a gag-fest, filled with dirty humour and teenage-boy jokes, It's All Gone Pete Tong is a funny, witty film which will happily fill an hour or two in the coming summer months.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
House of Wax (2005)
7/10
Spend a night in Paris...
7 June 2005
House of Wax was never intended to be a horror classic yet delieves some fun, gory and interesting scenes throughout. The characters are more or less the same in any other US teen slasher movie (the big bad boy, the preppy boyfriend, the caring girlfriend, the funny black guy, the geek and of course the tart with a heart) Surprisingly, most of the actors in the film deliver quite well, including almost debut actress Paris Hilton, who obviously isn't afraid of putting herself up for a little bit of mickey-taking. The plot takes a while to develop and you sit through the first quarter wondering when the action will start, but when it does its almost non stop from there to the end. House of Wax delivers some pretty creepy scenes, and the waxwork figures are just a weird as the two main madmen. The film makes you jump throughout and often makes you cringe and turn away from the gore, but its all worth it for the fantastic ending which is definitely a worth finalé of what is a good, fun and little bit twisted slasher flick.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Creep (I) (2004)
8/10
Cross you legs and close your eyes...
7 June 2005
Christopher Smith is an obvious horror fan and this is made clear in his debut horror flick 'Creep'. 'Creep' although a little bit loose on information, proves itself worthy of a true gory classic. A little less glossy than recent US horrors (Amityville Horror remake, House of Wax remake) this dark and gruesome tale follows Kate (Franka Potente) through the labyrinth of underground tunnels and disused railways as she, and a number of others along the way, try and flee a murderous attacker. Though some bad reviews have slated this film, I truly believe that on a tight budget and for a UK production from first time director Smith that 'Creep' truly does live up to its name. It delivers fast-paced gory action more or less from the beginning, sometimes too fast as the story is patchy in some areas, but with a perfect location and the best character-reaction-at-the-end I've seen in a while, 'Creep' delivers some scenes that are definitely the stuff of nightmares.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed