Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Jurassic World: A somewhat disappointing, but overall entertaining fan service.
12 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Consensus: While not able to match the original's smart script, intricate design, and general impact, Jurassic World is still a very entertaining summer blockbuster bound to satisfy the die-hard fans of the franchise.

To say I'm disappointed wouldn't be false. There were several instances where I was thinking man, this could be a lot better. However, to say that the movie didn't kick me in the ass with nostalgia and stellar action sequences wouldn't be false either. Jurassic World plays out exactly as one would expect… partly because it's set up is nearly identical to the first. Besides plot similarities, Jurassic World is, essentially, a fan service. Giving us dinosaur lovers everything we missed about the series. In that regard, the film is aces. There's so much action unfolding across the screen that breath breaks come at the cost of missing a raptor jump into a moving car to hack at it's driver. (Real Scene BTW). The movie also pays good homage to it's predecessor: showing us old venues, naming the control center after it's original creator John Hammond, and having composer Michael Giacchino reuse John William's iconic theme during the film. So, in regard to giving the fans what we want, the movie is golden. However, one must also address the problems in the script. Firstly, the character development is borderline atrocious. The characters are barely two-dimensional. Secondly, the dialogue is nowhere near as fast, witty, and memorable as Park's. And, lastly, the film is at times silly. Other than the script, the film fails at feeling "Spielbergian". While I'm one for directors implanting their mark on their films, in the realm of a franchise, it's good to reproduce similar tones of the originals. This was also a big problem in Jurassic Park III. There are also problems in the films general pace. The action starts far too early. The beauty of the original was that the first half of the film utilized simple awe to build the wonder of the park. In this film, at only 20 minutes in, the Rex is already loose and wreaking havoc. With these and a few more flaws, Jurassic World does fail at being smart. But, despite it's problems… I can't find it in me to hate this movie. Why? Because it's Jurassic Park. Being one of the most instrumental movies of my childhood, my first reaction to the movie was to turn off my brain and just let the dinos run across my field of vision. However, when it came time to writing this review, the brain had to come back on. Jurassic World might not be as smart as I might've hoped, but that doesn't mean it's not miles ahead of the third one and possibly ahead of the second in recreating the feel of the original. With another blockbuster performance from Chris Pratt and a surprisingly effective Bryce Dallas Howard, Jurassic World manages to embrace it's silliness, make fun of it, and still provide a very intense and satisfying payoff. And… before I end this review, I think it's important to address one thing: THIS ONE DIDN'T KILL OFF THE EFFING T-REX… that alone makes it far more superior to the audacious third film. Overall, I'd have to say if you're looking for the same smarts of the first, you better let your guard down… but if you want a good popcorn summer blockbuster that reminds you how awesome dinosaurs are… by all means, see this movie.
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Brief Review: Don't judge the show based on the first episode... Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt gets better... a lot better.
7 March 2015
While not as funny, binge worthy, or all together accessible as her first sitcom, 30 Rock, Tina Fey's second outing as head writer proves to have its own charms. The series may be slow at first, but give it three to four episodes and you'll be hooked. With a cast that gets better with age, writing that goes from zany and out of this world to surprisingly profound and sweet, and a stellar sense of humor, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt is the kind of series that improves over time, much like Ms. Fey's first sitcom. The cast includes a zesty Carol Kane, the funny as always Jane Krakowski, 30 Rock Guest alum Tituss Burgess, and our lead Ellie Kemper; these four hilariously colorful players take the normal NBC formula for comedy and make it into something far smarter and much sharper. The writing also manages to succeed beyond my expectations. As a HUGE fan of 30 Rock, I know Ms. Fey can write up a storm. However, I thought it was the comedian perception of Television that made it so fresh. No… it's her perception of diversity and identity and all their wonderfulness that makes this show work so well. As I mentioned earlier, the show is funny yes, but also much deeper than the common person will perceive. I'm glad to know that Netflix went for the full two seasons, for this show demands at least that many to get into its full rhythm. Remember, 30 Rock wasn't a masterpiece till season 3… I can't wait to see where the shows is when it hits its third season… and trust me… there will be a 3rd season.
120 out of 168 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boyhood (I) (2014)
10/10
Smart, moving, and profoundly realistic, Boyhood is not just the best picture of the year, but the defining film of a generation.
5 September 2014
When someone tells me "words cannot express..." I typically laugh at the absurdity. As a writer, I conceitedly believe that there are always words for everything. However, I must bow to this cliché. Words cannot express what I think of Richard Linklater's Boyhood. Given that it's been a little over 12 hours since I saw the film and I'm still speechless, I ask you to bear with me in this review. I WILL MONOLOGUE! To state that Boyhood is the best film of a year that's not but ¾ of the way through is a stretch, but I find myself limber in this instance. Boyhood is the best film of the year. Now time to stretch some more... Boyhood is the best film of the decade. Still limber. No stretching needed. This movie is THAT incredible.

It all began with an innovative idea from the already innovative Richard Linklater. What if we see a family grow and age through the eyes of a child? And what if we shot it in real-time? From there a spark was ignited and eventually came to a glorious flame. We do see a family age, for 12 years! This idea is already a selling point for the film, but then throw in Mr. Linklater's usual touch of heart and authenticity and you'll have something undeniably special. You'll have an intimate epic. A film that is so large in a technical scale, and equally large in emotional sale is something hardly seen. Especially in the past 12 years. So when Boyhood premiered at the Sundance Film Festival, there was a lot hype. And this excitement hasn't expired after several months. Instead it has grown. It has traveled through America crafting an astute reputation for the film to follow. So for film-goers like myself, who live in small, un-artistic towns, find ourselves overwhelmed with praise for a film we must wait for. And we did. I personally waited a full month-and-a-half for this film to hit El Paso. But 6 weeks is nothing compared to 12 years, so I shall cease my complaining. Instead I shall say this, Boyhood's reputation precedes itself.

As the film opens were are introduced to Mason, the central character. The "boy" in boyhood. He is six years old, and the year is 2002. This is when we begin our 12 year journey with him. At the end of the school day, Mason is picked up by his mother Olivia (an electric Patricia Arquette). Early on in the film we get a sense of the living conditions of Olivia. But, instead of shifting the narrative towards her, we stick with Mason, and remain oblivious to the full condition of Olivia's life. In many instances, there is nothing heard or seen that Mason isn't hearing or seeing. If his parents are fighting in the next room, we don't see it, because Mason doesn't see it.

After a few minutes, Mason spends time with his father (Ethan Hawke at his finest). Mason, Sr. is just what you'd expect. He's your typical absentee dad, one who only shows up with gifts and fun, but never seems to be serious about raising a family. However, since we see things as Mason does, this dad is awesome and greatly missed. At this point, the plot becomes clear. This is a film about a broken family. To scrutinize the plot would be to write an 11-15 page review. There is so much going on within each year of the film that the 12 year story is impossible to break down into a simple synopsis. After the first 12-15 minutes of the movie, the film cuts to a new year, 2003, and we find the characters have moved on from the last. This process is continued throughout the entire film till we reach adulthood in 2013. And with this formula, a masterpiece is crafted.

There is something so psychologically groundbreaking about this film. Never before has a film been so relatable, so memorable, and so poignant. As each year appears on the screen, we the audience subconsciously immerse ourselves into the same time period. We recall what we thought and did in that year, and find ourselves nostalgic. This feeling is especially effective for members of Mason's generation, like myself. We recall the same thought patters and experiences Mason goes through as we went through them. With this intimacy, we find ourselves reliving our childhood. This beautiful feeling is something no other film has caused. This is why Boyhood is so groundbreaking, because it is able to captivate its audience and allow us to have a relationship with it. What Mr. Linklater has done is not only craft a work of art, but allow the audience to view the crafting of the work of art. Brick by brick, line by line, side by side, for anybody involved in this film, whether it be the filmmakers or the audience members, there is an intimate, one-on-one feeling that transcends both time and reality. And for that, we are indebted to the filmmakers. Being Mason's age myself, I find Boyhood to be a very special film that is incredibly close to my heart. As I sat in the theater, watching Mason head off to college, I suddenly realized that that was me. I too had just transitioned into adulthood, and started a new chapter in my life.

Epic in both a technical and an emotional scope, Boyhood defines a generation by allowing the audience to go on their own intimate journey with the characters. Though the film is a rough 3 hours long, you feel as if it lasts the whole 12 years, simply because you are reliving the period yourself. Boyhood is the type of movie you don't want to end because there is something so deep in the connection it made with you. This I can say with no reservation. Boyhood is one of the most unique, personal, and authentic films I have ever encountered.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed