Change Your Image
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjQ4MTY5NzU2M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDc5NTgwMTI@._V1_SY100_SX100_.jpg)
ciprimes
Reviews
Titina (2022)
A Visual Feast Hindered by Narrative Missteps
Titina proves to be a missed opportunity for a great movie. While the animation style captivates with its warm colors, beautiful lines, and an overall artistic ambiance, the film falters in several crucial aspects.
The first third of the movie successfully delves into the realm of emotions, creating an engaging and immersive experience. The animation style undoubtedly shines during this portion, enhancing the overall impact.
However, the film takes a regrettable turn with its inconsistent narrative. The plot lacks cohesion, leaving viewers grappling with a disjointed storyline. The inappropriate scenes, which may not be suitable for children under 10, create a jarring contrast with the initial emotional focus, ultimately detracting from the overall viewing experience.
A particularly disappointing aspect is the unnecessary injection of politics, straying from the promised emotional journey. Furthermore, the film's departure from historical accuracy, even when presenting real expedition footage, is a letdown. While artistic liberties are expected, a more faithful representation would have lent credibility to the narrative.
The weak writing and modest directing performance further diminish the film's potential. The animation style, while a saving grace, cannot fully compensate for the lackluster storytelling and direction.
It's worth questioning the choice of the title, "Titina," as it inaccurately represents the movie's perspective. Rather than being seen through the eyes of the titular dog, the focus remains entirely on the interpersonal drama between the main characters. This misalignment between title and content sets up a mismatched expectation for the audience.
In conclusion, Titina showcases glimpses of brilliance through its animation style and emotional exploration but falls short due to inconsistent narrative, inappropriate scenes, political deviations, and historical inaccuracies. The film's saving grace is its visual aesthetic, but it's not enough to salvage what could have been a truly great cinematic experience.