Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A deep film that demands more patience than it should
9 May 2021
As another reviewer wrote earlier, I have little doubt that the film's mediocre rating is due to its slowness in developing the thesis that Mamoru Oshii hides behind the plot. It is a film that demands patience, so much in fact, that I find it directly to blame for the negative reviews. It is not a viewer's fault to lose interest when they have already seen more than half of a film and the fog that shrouds the plot remains as dense as it was at the beginning.

Nevertheless, with proper time, the doubts and issues that may have seemed incoherent are explained with efficiency and appeal. What initially looks inconsistent, once the viewer is given the background information, makes complete sense. The characters' erratic behavior, the anachronistic war machines, the nonsensical dialogues: it all makes sense in just a few minutes through an almost epiphany.

The film, very much in Oshii's style, raises philosophical questions revolving around existentialism and the ontology of human beings: what is the role of war in society, are our memories what make us what we are, what is the point of continuing to live day by day? All these questions are treated by the director in a plot that is unnecessarily slow, but still fascinating.

The Sky Crawlers forced me to reexamine the mindset I have when I watch an anime film. When I sit down to watch these types of works, I expect clichéd characters, fantastically absurd plots and flat thoughts that pretend to have depth. While there are plenty of exceptions, it is undeniable that many anime productions use characters and formulas as predictable as Hollywood blockbusters. The Sky Crawlers, to a prejudiced viewer like me, may at first seem like just another film in the long line of those Japanese animated features that rely more on the beauty of their art than their content. This is not the case. This is a deep and thoughtful work that, sadly, moves at a slower pace than what contemporary moviegoers are used to. I insist: the plot is spectacular and not overly complex, it is just slow.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Das Boot (1981)
6/10
Amazingly war drama but with an excessively long cut
14 March 2021
I have little to say about Das Boot. It is an incredibly acted film, with a simple but empathetic and touching story. The ending is brutal and apotheosic. The effects are stylish and elegant, even to this day the film looks very well done: the submarine, the exteriors, the explosions, the floods, absolutely everything looks real. The only problem for me was that the version I watched is too long: more than three and a half hours. That's too much for a movie in which not much happens, not much dialogue revolves around a plot, and it happens in nearly one location. Maybe if I had watched the two and a half hour version it would have been easier to enjoy, but even though I'm used to movies that run longer than 160 minutes, this one didn't suit the length. I got bored and even felt drowsy. Nevertheless, it is a very good movie and one of a kind.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Incendies (2010)
6/10
A touching film that depends on coincidences all the way up to ridiculous
25 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I have written this review as a response to all those who find in this film a perfect jewel and label it as underrated (although in many sites it is highly rated and has more than 100,000 views). It is true that it is a very entertaining and interesting film, and I think that, for many viewers, the obvious weaknesses of the film are not so obvious. Something that I liked and called attention to is the narrative structure. Some twins (female and male) find out from their mother's will that they have a brother and that their father is alive. The mother commands them to find them both. During the first part of the film, only the daughter decides to carry out her mother's wishes, and to do so she travels to a Middle Eastern country (which is never specified) where, as she travels through places that played an important role in her mother's life, we are presented with her biography through flashbacks. It is easy to feel confused at first with the factions (Christian and Muslim), because they do not correspond to a historical reality, but rather were made in the service of fiction. However, little by little, the viewer is able to put the puzzle back together and discover the hard life that the woman led in the midst of violence and intolerance. The film has a lot of plot-twists that manage to arouse the interest of their audience and, to a certain extent, are presented in such a way that it is possible to glimpse them when they approach. Unfortunately, the film depends too much on coincidences of sudden and unexplained developments. About this, in many occasions I found elements that, although they should seem natural, were not very well explained and, of course, for the final outcome to happen the scriptwriters took the coincidences to the last consequences. Although Nawal Marwan seems to live in a rural environment, she is able to move to a relative who works at a university. Despite the fact that at first she cannot read or write (at around 21 years of age), she soon manages to work at a newspaper writing articles. The screenwriters made Marwan a prodigious mind: even though she began receiving education as an adult, within a few years she is able to infiltrate as a tutor to the son of an extremist Christian leader she was tasked to kill, teaching him French and English. After killing this leader, she is finally captured and taken to a prison where she is tortured for no less than 15 years. After being raped by one of her captors and becoming pregnant, she is released (instead of executed) and, with the help of the warlord who benefited from the Christian leader's death, she's exiled to Canada. The same pattern is repeated in the son's story. He is left in an orphanage where, ultimately, is recruited by an extremist Muslim group. There he is trained as a militia officer, a sniper. He is not just any sniper, of course, he is the most skilled and recognized of all. Eventually, the enemy faction, the Christians, manage to capture him, but, because of his ability, they decide not to execute him but to recruit him themselves (wasn't it supposed to be a holy war?) and, moreover, they do not train him as a sniper (there is no justification for it), but as a torturer. In his new job he ends up working in the prison where, by chance, his mother is. He unknowingly rapes her, she gets her pregnant and thus he becomes the twins' father and brother at the same time. This is shocking and, I admit, makes one reflect on the way in which war separates people who, in peace, would live together happily. It is a sad and painful story, incisive and critical of the senselessness of war, but it is weakened by its dependence on so many unjustified elements. And, without a doubt, what put me most against the film was how the mother came to know that the one who raped her was her own son. In a swimming pool, the woman sees a man who, on his foot, has the tattoo with which she marked her son to identify him. Then, upon discovering his face, she is horrified that her son is the father of the twins, the rapist. The pain of the scene is diluted by the coincidences: her son emigrated from the country where he was originally and precisely that country is Canada and, besides, she finds him in a pool, where she can see his foot and recognize the mark. Finally, the son is unable to recognize her as his victim, so the man does not run away, fearing that he will be denounced for his past crimes. By leaving her will, the mother entrusts her children with the torturous task of discovering that they are their own brother's children, a task that would be impossible were it not for the fact that they are "lucky" enough to correlate the records and find the people who could lead them to the truth. Although I have vilified the film, in reality it is a very beautiful film visually, with an impeccable performance and a catchy plot, but it depends on coincidences that become ridiculous and take it away from a perfect rating.
40 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Abominable (2019)
7/10
Funny, cute, interesting but not memorable animated film
15 November 2020
I really enjoyed this film. I am a true lover of animated films; however, like many, I am bothered about the clichés that tend to dominate the animation for children. In the case of Abominable, the film fulfills all the clichés and yet it is an interesting film.

Indeed, this is a children's film with all the clichés: protagonist with a personal problem who, by accident, meets a magical animal that takes her on a journey in which they have to confront a villain. During the course of that journey, the protagonist rethinks her problems, matures and overcomes them, confronts the villain and defeats him and finally saves her hairy magic friend. So far, there is nothing special about it; however, Abominable, playing with predictable elements, manages to be entertaining, amusing and emotional. And there are good reasons for that.

Like many other animated films, it is visually very pleasing. One thing that I would like to highlight is that, instead of choosing the typical American child as the main character, Abominable stars a Chinese teenager. Although the result of the film is somewhat Americanized, we are shown beautiful landscapes from China to the Himalayas, including the metropolis of Shangai as well as flower fields, the Great Buddha of Leshan, the Yellow River and much more. I am also grateful that we are not shown the typical China of animated films: the Great Wall and many pagodas. In addition, the journey of the protagonists provides a variety of landscapes in their lighting and color palette. It is absolutely beautiful.

But what I really liked about this film is how well constructed the characters are. From the main character's family to her travel companions, everyone feels right. It is fantastic to find that, although they are within the stereotypes of the lonely girl, the popular boy and the hyperactive boy, the characters are deep enough so that they are not soulless archetypes. On the contrary, they have both positive and negative aspects, relate to each other naturally and evolve throughout the film. I highlight, in particular, the growth of the protagonist and Jin, the other teenager. The events of the plot do not force them to make an abrupt change to meet the needs of the film, but as the film progresses, the characters take on new attitudes because the situation requires it. And this, without a doubt, is the most brilliant point of this film. The characters are not irritating, they are funny and they are incredibly human.

Of course, not everything is praise. Abominable moves within a typical children's picture plot. It doesn't take any risks at all, but uses an easy and predictable formula. It is true that it makes the best use of that formula, but one can hardly say that it dares anything else. There are some (surprising?) aspects about the villains that are remarkable, but they are far from being really original. Another point aside is that the film relies excessively on the magical powers of the Yeti. Yes, we know it's a fantasy picture: there is a yeti that has magical powers, and there is nothing wrong with that; however, almost every time the main characters have to face an obstacle, the magic of the yeti solves it, and so, the greater the difficulty, the more extraordinary the powers of the yeti become. Although Abominable never gets boring, it presents again and again repetitive difficulties to the heroes that are, likewise, solved in a repetitive way.

In conclusion, it is a good film. It's a lot of fun and I recommend it for both adults and children. All in all, it is worth seeing, although it is certainly not the most memorable film.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Moonlight (I) (2016)
6/10
More sociological than narrative
25 July 2020
A creative film in which there is a bunch of themes an symbols about masculinity, homosexuality and being black. However the story is more a made up of tropos than some good tale to be telled. The film makes you think and feel, but the story lacks of interest.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
If you are an anime fan don't watch this... And if you're not, still don't watch it
24 May 2020
This is an one hour ad for Netflix's anime series. It was made by and for people who don't have watched anime, but it is still bad for that public. There is nothing remarkable here that let you learn or get interested into anime.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Just another animated film
16 June 2017
When you see the film's title, you can get a close idea about the plot of the film; once you have watched the first fifteen minutes of it, you will no longer doubt that you are facing a love story between a commoner and a princess. I have never read the light novel, so, as I ignore how the print version is, I'm just going to judge the film as a work alone.

The film causes enough warm feelings and develops its story to keep its audience interested during the hour and half the movie longs. However, beyond showing a romantic cliché with elements of typical Japanese animation (traumatized characters, those who cannot express what they feel, and people who gives exaggerated hate treatments against someone, etc.) the film do not offer anything else.

On the technical aspects, the film is visually beautiful. Colorful drawings, landscapes where blue and white prevail that transmit the spirit of marine-celestial calm which is the protagonist life desire. There is use of animation Cel-Shading, which never leaves me a good impression, but, as a relief, it is limited to the airships. The music never represents a memorable accompaniment, it is appropriate to situations, however, you will forget it after have finished the film. The theme song of the film don't shines against any other presented in many animated films for young audience: calm, simple, repetitive and with some degree of "catchiness" tune.

Now I would like to talk about a link between the narrative and the technical side: the resolving of action scenes. This is one of the weakest points in the film. Those moments in which the Santa Cruz is surrounded by enemies, a huge army firing thousands of projectiles, and the pilot always can fly away, managing in the process to destroy one or two enemy ships, are nonsensical. These scenes are really disappointing and quickly ruin any credibility that the film have harvested. I could not help thinking on those American films of the eighties where an army from a Third World country is incapable of firing a single shot at a single man running among indiscriminate fire. I'm not exaggerating. The talented but still young Charles Karino evades tens of thousands of projectiles, including those tracker ones, with his exceptional but supposed not indestructible airplane. Certainly, only a companion like Juana del Moral could honor the young pilot, who was able to beat the ace pilot of the enemy army during the first time that in her whole life she had ever fired a gun.

There are actually very few roses I can give to this film. Since the beginning, when it's given a mission of national importance to a young mestizo in a country where clearly xenophobia and racism are deeply rooted. It is never suggested that the boy is experienced enough to do such a quest: he has never done the route that he was asked to do and, worst of all, it is pretty obvious that his country distrusts him. The future empress of the state is left in the hands of a mercenary who is constantly insulted (in a way close to absurdity), almost trying to incite him to an uprising before a feeling of patriotism.

The rest of it is more cliché: childhood friendship, lonely protagonist, cruel fate, travel in which the characters open their hearts… The ending is unsatisfactory to the western ideals, as the most of Japanese entertainment love stories; that does not make the end of a film a bad end. You can't complain about the film when it lacks texture, is predictable in most cases, has a unlikely plot. If anyone wants to watch this film, it's going to be OK. If you don't have anything else to do and just want to relax in your sofa, this is your film. A simple, flat, sweet feature film.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed