Reviews

Part one, Leila In "Laila Brothers" there is light, there is a lantern, and that lantern is "Laila"; Not Leila herself, but Leila's "rationality". Leila is the lantern of the story; It is a lantern because it wants to overcome corruption with the power of reason. This "Laila" is no longer "Sumiya" who has no choice between the two options of putting her pelvis under her mother or being sold to a rich suitor. No! This Laila is the axis of the family's rationality. This Leela offers a "solution". Why? Because he wants to live. Leila is the life-creating woman whose concept has recently been formed in the society and it is natural that this life-creating and rationalist woman cannot be commanded or forbidden. Leila has understood that there is an "intergenerational" problem and a large part of the problems is rooted in the irrationality of the previous generation, so it is necessary to stop the burning of the lives of the fathers, it is necessary to stand up and mobilize the brothers and even slap the previous generation!

The film "Leila Brothers" also shows the multi-layered misery of Iranian life: family, society, politics. A person is born in the midst of superstitions and family traditions, and until the generation of his parents are alive, he feels the claws of this pettiness on his throat. At the same time that he is involved in family ignorance and irrationality, he must cross the minefield of society, and in the meantime, macro-economic corruption and Trump's tweets fall on his life like a bomb. If he passes this layer, he will fall into the traps of the next layers. The political-economic variables governing people's livelihood become so complicated that the citizen can no longer calculate. The first mistake becomes a fatal mistake... the normal affairs of life become a game of life and death, and from one place to the next, nothing can be fixed...

In this labyrinth of depravity, the girl must become the axis of rationality in life, fight against all the foolishness and weaknesses of personality and culture and pull the blanket of her brothers from the water, that too in a house where her father sees the masculinity of the baby in a swaddling clothes, flowers bloom from flower to flower...

All these 3 hours that I saw Batman, I was constantly at a crossroads, whether I was seeing Sherlock Holmes or Batman?

Because Batman, who was in the movie, was looking for a flashlight to solve the riddle and puzzle. In fact, he was more of a detective than Batman.

The rhythm and story of the film was almost similar to "Se7en", which is also a detective film.

Of course, since Matt Reeves' record showed that he was a good director, we expected to see a better film, but he still could not do it; it seems that no director can make Batman with three They do not compete with Christopher Nolan's Batman series The last word: if we consider the film from the point of view of a detective, it was a good film, but Mr. Director, we did not ask you for a detective film, we asked you for Batman My rating out of 10 for this movie: 7.4

* Nolan Triple: batman begins 2005 dark knight 2008 dark knight rises 2012.

If we look at the film from the point of view of an ordinary viewer, it is a fun and interesting film that has come up with an innovative idea by bringing in characters that we have memories of in the past.

But I do not want to look into the eyes of an ordinary viewer who is just looking for a movie to entertain him. Although I am not a critic, I would like to see the film through the eyes of a critic, so my view on the film is this: Awful movie. The plot sucked and had awful pacing humour, and dialogue were subpar(like the octopus joke). And they couldn't think of anything better so they brought back some old characters which still didn't save this poorly written film. One bad dialogue scene was when the 3 Spider-Men where making jokes about Tobey's organic webs which was just awkward and humourless. And to add to that, Tobey saying that "my back" joke and Norman Osborn repeating "I'm something of a scientist myself". Just why?! The film could never decide whether it's a comedy or a dark action movie. This movie certifies that Tom Holland is the worst Spider-Man. With great power comes great responsibilty and MCU Spider-Man lacks that. He's had 6 movies and still acts like an inexperienced, immature, not independent, not smart and acts like a rookie. And the whole plot started because he couldn't think of an alternative to get him and his friends to college so he got Doctor Strange to go and make a spell so that everyone will forget that Peter is Spider-Man(also doing it without his friends consent). And of course with Peter being the doofus he is, he messes up the spell which causes the multiverse to colide. There's a reason why his messes are always cleaned up by someone better than him. One of Spider-Man's best traits is his quick thinking and it was so inevitable that after messing up the spell, he decides to go and talk to the headteacher of the college for a placement(same scene where Doctor Octopus appears). You'd think he would have learnt his lesson about trusting villains in Far From Home but no; he does it again which caused Aunt May's death. It could have been avoided if he had just sent them home, but no they needed to be "cured"(which is odd because The Lizard was cured in the Amazing Spider-Man). It just made him look sappy and too Disney like, thinking he can change their fate. It's also not smart to invite dangerous villains into your house with a non superhero family member there. How could he trust them that quickly? When you see it, you find it hard to feel bad for Peter because you're like "yeah this guy sucks" The emotional scenes in this movie were pretty awful, especially how long and stretched May's death was and they still tried to exchange jokes and had her standing up right before dying(also re wording Uncle Ben's infamous line which sounded wrong). Family member deaths are always before the character becomes a hero so doing it after feels cheap. It wasn't even basic superhero bad luck, just Spider-Man not thinking straight. Marvel really need new writers(especially in the comedic department), because they've released 4 bad movies this year and a TV show that messed up a timeline just like No Way Home did. And they've also ruined Spider-Man's character by not properly developing him and just throwing him into the Avengers drama. They are cash grabbers and only adding him because he is popular and it will get the movie ticket sales up. Watch Spectacular Spider-Man if you wanna see a better version of a teenger superhero. No Way Home is one of the few movies that make me wish the villains had won, and the reason is that the plot armour on Spider-Man was too strong. Like when geometry was somehow the answer to get out of the mirror dimension. Green Goblin was right about his morality getting the better of him. Overall this movie was just an overhyped, over budgeted nostalgia bait and Spider-Man is the real antagonist of this film. Always puts people in danger for no reason. J. Jonah Jameson was right about him messing things up and being a "Spider-Menace". It won't be long till Marvel outmilk him.