Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
It's a Masterpiece Alright...A Masterpiece of 💩
15 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie got one thing right with it's marketing, and that's that it's "not easy being meh." For that to happen, you need a few things: some effort, equal parts creative, and some semblance of a soul. Even if it's not enough, you at least tried, and the problem with this movie is that it doesn't give a care in the world.

While the animation and voice acting is good enough, the rest of the movie doesn't just go downhill, it jumps of a twenty foot cliff into a gorge of spikes, rattle snakes, and lava, and the worst part is it could've been another Lego Movie, Wreck-It Ralph, and Inside Out but decides to prove everybody right instead. First of all, the story makes no sense. The story follows Gene, a "meh" emoji, as he, Hi-5, and Jailbreak, the "hacker emoji how happens to be a princess who can call the Twitter bird despite being mad at Gene and Hi-5 for asking, journey to the cloud where Gene will be able to be "meh." Get ready for some plot holes, folks, because you'll getting them. As you can already guess, Gene's parents are also "meh" emojis, however, Gene has a case of not sticking to one emotion, because he can feel them all, baby, and as you progress through the movie, you learn that his father, Mel, also had the same issue, yet he was able to control the emotions. So why didn't he help Gene during the years he was a father? Seriously, this "disorder" didn't crop up overnight, did it? And why was Gene allowed to work with people knowing he has this "disorder?" No one snitched? Anyway, as you can expect, Gene messes up on his first day, when he made the wrong face, causing Alex the Human to send the wrong emoji to his crush, Ms. InsertRandomNameHereBecauseICan'tRememberIfSheWasInTheMovieOrNot (it's actually Addie, but as interesting she is, that might as well be her name). Let's look at how the movies it tried to rip off handle humans. In the Lego Movie, we learn that the movie took place within a child's imagination, thus leading up to a heartwarming end when the father appears, Inside Out was about emotions within the human mind, which does affect the human in some ways, and Wreck-It Ralph at least had the decency to have the humans take a back seat when Fix-It Felix Jr. didn't properly due to Ralph's absence. Yes, they made the danger of being trashed, but you didn't see the human every few minutes, because to the humans, the video game cabinet was just getting old and was likely glitching out for that reason. Here though, we cut back and forth between Phone World and the Human World. I don't like these punk kids. They're so obsessed with their phones that they can't communicate without it, and it feels like I'm a political cartoon about phones. They also have no personality other than being cutouts, and whenever the emojis journey into an app, they mess with the phone itself, such as turning on Spotify, Candy Crush, and Just Dance, embarrassing Alex, and that's it. Speaking of those things, the product placement! Seriously, they are terrible. Not only do they say the name of the apps, but they also demonstrate how to play Just Dance and Candy Crush. You have better fun playing a tutorial level in a video game than what's basically the equivalent of YouTuber reminding you every five minutes that video is sponsored by Dollar Shave Club. It makes the movie so...soulless. Back to the story though, there are more things that don't make sense. For example, the trash can scene! Okay, if an app gets deleted, wouldn't the people inhabiting the app essentially be dead and not alive in the Memory Dump from Inside Out? Also, why are trolls and spam there? While they were in the piracy app Alex had, these two things are not baked into phones or the apps themselves. Trolls are people who rile others up by saying "mean" things for their own enjoyment, and spam is stored on a server. So, again, why are they here? Also, Alex decides to erase his phone, in what's really the longest end-of-the-world segment I've seen, and because Gene used his multiple personalities to save his world, Alex unplugs the phone while it's wiping and sends the emoji to Ms. WhoAreYouAgain. First of all, I'm sure that will corrupt data on the phone, and what makes Alex believe it wasn't a virus causing that? Again, he has a piracy app installed, disguised as the Dictionary app, so he would've right to assume such thing. They didn't even try to write a cohesive story, I think the out-of-touch big-wigs at Sony just wanted the forced product placement in it.

Lastly, the characters are either vanilla or horrible. Examples are Hi-5 being a useless comic relief character until convenient, Hacker was a princess emoji that gets mad at Gene and Hi-5 for asking about whistling for birds, but she calls the Twitter bird anyway, and then there's Poop. This character is the reason Xavier went crazy in Logan, because he knew his actor took the easy job of just spouting a bunch of cringy poop jokes. Let's not forget Gene's dad, who , if you remember early in the review, is definitely parent of the year. The humans are also so boring with one-not personalities that they are really token characters, which is ironic since T.J. Miller, the voice of Jean, said that the movie had a "non-preachy feminist agenda." Please, do yourself a favor, and don't buy this movie. Don't even rent it. It's pretty much as bad as critics say it is. Only great thing about it was the Puppy short showed before it, and even that's on YouTube. Terrible movie!
4 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Michael Jackson's Halloween (2017 TV Movie)
4/10
Not the Worst, But It is a Bland Experience
28 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I have to admit that I didn't even expect this to be good,and it sure didn't disappoint in that regard. It's mostly bland at best.

First of all, the animation is below average. Sometimes, it's good enough, but there are times where it didn't look good at all, like the last part of the movie. Have you ever seen those California Raisins commercials? Well, when you finally see Micheal Jackson for the first time, not a single body part or his bat form, the animation will more than likely remind you of that. In fact, that's what most of the dancing at the end looks like. It would have been fine if it was animated with clay, but this is a computer animated special. It also doesn't help that some models looking like plastic dolls, like the main characters for example. Some of it might have something to do with the lighting, but it does show how cheap this show is.

Another issue I have is the story. It's your typical "follow your heart" story, but the pacing is a bit fast. Seriously, as soon as a character is introduced, they're gone until the final scene. For example, the main characters' father and boss. Vincent wanted to be a DJ, but his father wants him to take over his grocery business, while Victoria wanted to dance at some party until her boss gives her the job of taking care of her dog for the night. While that much is known, you don't really see those two characters again until the final seconds of the movie. You also have no reason to find these characters interesting. While some of them do have motives, such as Hay Man wanting to bring music back from the authoritarian Calamity, they certainly don't bring any note-worthy personality. In fact, the two main characters are basically walking pieces of wood. Some of this could be blamed on pacing, since a majority don't have that much screen time, but these characters could've been fleshed out a bit more. Overall, the story wasn't great in the slightest, and it was just so bland.

It's pretty hard to recommend this movie. While it's not a bad movie, it's just bland to the point that you wish it was. It's fast pacing doesn't help matters either, as it just made the movie sorta hard to follow. I recommend not watching this movie seriously. About the only things about this special that was decent was the voice acting and music, but with experienced actors such as Jim Parsons (which means I could never unthink about Sheldon dancing Michael Jackson-style) and mostly Michael Jackson music (except for Someone's Watching Me), is that really a surprise? If you do watch it, just don't expect anything spectacular.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cuphead (2017 Video Game)
10/10
A Cup of Tea that has Turned into a Mug
8 October 2017
I remember when I first saw this game on TV when the Xbox One was first revealed. When this game flashed on screen during an ID@Xbox show reel, I became interested in an instant. That was back in 2013, and skip forward a few years later, I have yet to buy an Xbox One or any of the "exclusives," even when most of them are on PC. That changed when this game FINALLY released, and the best part is, the wait is worth it.

Now, before I get too deep into the gameplay, I have to say that unlike most journalists in the field these days, I'm not gonna do the idiotic "#Cup Souls" thing or even compare this game to Dark Souls in the slightest. While Dark Souls can be challenging, a more accurate comparison is most likely an NES game, which can actually be more difficult. Just like a NES game, more precisely Contra, it's an easy-to-play Run-N-Gun game, thanks to the simple tutorial that only a certain game journalist would find hard, that becomes hard thanks to ever spawning enemies and projectiles everywhere. Luckily, the game is still fair, and it even feels rewarding beating the bosses in the game, which is mostly what the game is. The controls are tight and responsive, though I have changed the dash to the Right Trigger for better access, and never have I felt like they were fighting against me. Back to the bosses, though, they will give you a beat down. We're talking about bosses that will fill the screen with projectiles and enemies, and they will require your whole attention span and quick thumbs to beat them. This game is a great time, solo or co-op, but if you're not a fan of hard games, it won't be for you.

Now, for the one thing it quickly got attention for, the graphics. Seriously, we can gush over a game for having the most "ULTRA-REALISTIC" graphics, but I find this game to have the most impressive graphics I've ever seen. This game sets out to emulate the look of the 1930s cartoons, and it emulates it to a T. The game sprites run at 24 fps, just like the cartoons of old, but still provides a rock solid 60 fps during gameplay, except for some very rare frame dips. The music and sound also adds to the graphics as well with the soundtracks mix of jazz and ragtime (if you don't believe me, just look up "Dice King theme" on YouTube), and you can even hear crackling sounds during the quiet times.

Overall, this a hard, yet awesome game that emulates the aesthetic perfectly. If you have an Xbox One, this game is a must-have, and even if you're getting the game on PC, which you have a choice of getting it from Steam, GOG, or Microsoft Store if you want the "Play Anywhere" version, this game can pretty much run on a toaster.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sonic Mania (2017 Video Game)
10/10
One of those modern goldies that plays like the oldies (Switch version reviewed)
24 August 2017
With two Sonic games coming out this year, Sega starts off strong with Sonic Mania, essentially a love letter to the Genesis titles made by fan-game creator Christian Whitehead and using his Retro Engine. Basically, this game is what Sonic 4 Part 1 and 2, which were average games at best, should be.

The first thing I have to say is the level design is superb. They provide a nice balance between platforming and speed, and even with levels that were simply reused themes, such as Green Hill Zone, have some sort of twist. Controls are also nice and responsive (as far as gameplay is concerned) and works well with either single or duo Joy-Con play. The graphics also receive an upgrade from the Genesis. In fact, I could go as far as to say it's more like a 32x, maybe Saturn, game, and the animation is pretty fluid and bouncy. In the special stages, it goes into an Emerald Stage, which is chasing an UFO to catch get the Emerald, goes into a Saturn like style, which keeps use with the classic aesthetic the game has.

If there are some issues I have, they're small, but they are noticeable. First of all, this is the Switch version I'm reviewing, and these problems seem to be exclusive for the platform. Also, from what research I've did, the port to Switch was done by Tantalus Media, who were responsible for many licensed games, though they do port jobs such as Legend of Zelda Twilight Princess HD, Zombi (which is basically Zombi U for PS4, Xbox One, and PC), and the soon to be release Rime for Switch, so I can't blame the main devs themselves, and I can only imagine the company will do a better job with Switch games in the future. Anyway, one of these two issues is that the special stages, which I'm sure isn't that demanding on the Switch, does drop frames. They're not big dips like 60 fps all the way to 15 fps. It just drops down to the 50s for a second and that's it, and that's if you experience it. Another, more noticeable issue is that the Home and Screenshot buttons have a delay. Yeah, you heard that right. These two buttons have a delay on the Nintendo Switch, and sometimes, they don't even work. Again, they're not gamebreaking bugs, easily overlooked even, but it's kind of disappointing that they exist. They should be fixed whenever they release a patch though.

Simply put, this game is a love letter to the classic games of the Genesis, and whatever system you want it for, it's a must have, and even with the Switch version's problems, it's still the version I recommend getting, if you have one. It's simply that much of a blast, even without Blast Processing.

UPDATE: Due to a recent patch that was FINALLY delivered. Not only did they fix the Home button issue, but they added a separate button for Super Form, which is now X instead of tapping jump twice, so no accidental transformations.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boring and Not Worth the Money "Renting"
21 October 2016
Thank goodness Redbox exist. With the backlash the movie got from the trailer, which I admit didn't look that great, and the performance it had at the box office, I had very low expectations, and even then, those expectations were not met.

First of all, let's talk about the comedy, if you can call it that. It's pretty much the most juvenile humor you can think of since *insert Adam Sandler movie*, and it tries way too hard to be funny. Even when I remember the last Ghostbusters, I remember it being a bit grounded. Yet, unlike this "thing," it was actually funny when it does try. I have heard that the cast was trying to outdo each other to see who's the funniest from one of the main starring roles, so that should really give you confidence in this movie.

Speaking of cast, I much prefer Bill Murray and the other OGs over this "female Ghostbusters." Not saying that a female Ghostbusters wouldn't work, but this cast isn't that great at all. My first problem is that, again, they tried too hard to be funny, which comes off as annoying, and if that's not enough, there are even some stereotypes, which is funny when people are called sexist for not liking this movie, yet the main characters hire a male receptionist just because of his looks (sure ain't for his smarts), and even Leslie Jones plays the stereotypical loud black woman. Overall, there's not much to like about these guys.

As far as CGI, it "meh" at best. It can look decent at times, but other times, like with the Marshmallow Man for example, it can look cartoony. Really, this is the one time I prefer the original Ghostbusters special effects over the new one, despite the fact that the old one uses 2D effects.

Overall, I highly recommend a skip. It was pretty boring, it tries too hard to be funny, where as the original movie didn't have to try that hard, and the cast of characters suck. Instead, I recommend watching the original movies, and even the 2009 video game which fans unofficially call "Ghostbusters 3," and with good reason. This is just an example of a movie that didn't need to be rebooted and suffered for it.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A "Not-So-Worthy" First Impression
14 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Oh boy! Legends of Chamberlain Heights is finally here, whether you like it or not. Really, I wasn't expecting much from this, but hey, I might as well give it a shot. First of all, this show is just...I can't find a word to describe it. I gave Family Guy flack for having only a small amount of animation in the later seasons, but at least they portray some actions, and even Squidbillies has a bit of charm with it's ugly visuals and can show some form of emotion and action. This show has barely any animation, even when it does, it's, give or take, at least five frames of animation, and that's being generous. Sometimes, limited animation can be the most charming part of a show, but the characters in this show just feels like cardboard cutouts. But that's all I will say about the animation, sense you can see that in the previews.

Now, let's talk about the characters themselves. We have characters such as Grover, a basketball fanatic who has a crush on some girl and has Lebron James posters all over the room (might as well call them wallpapers) and calls him God in the first few minutes, Jamal, a chubby stereotype, and Milk, a.k.a. Malibu's Most Wanted. Other than the fact that they really want to get laid, there's nothing really memorable about these characters. The voice acting doesn't help either, as Grover sounds like some character from a poorly acted children's show, and the others can be pretty annoying, especially when you take into account that they use the most random slang ever, such as referring to a woman's vagina "cakes," for example. Where did this slang come from exactly?

The story is also your average high school story. These three freshmen basketball players want to get into a party hosted by seniors, but in order to do so, they must find drugs for the party. They later ended up founding a bunch of them in Milk's mother's bathroom (oh, and Milk's mother is the gold digger if you can't get what the show is saying), and they end up making their own drugs, which gives off a big high, but there are some "side effects" with it, including a certain piece of the human body falling off. Of course, the freshmen basketball players get pranked by the seniors, some joke about how cops are racist, and then there was an interacting with Grover and his crush, and the first episode is finally over. From that synopsis I made up, you can tell the humor is just the usually adult comedy gross out humor and sex jokes, and this show's characters most memorable characteristic is just wanting "cakes." Yeah, the story wasn't that great.

Honestly, this could've been something that's so cringy that it can be good for bad reasons, but it's just cringingly bad. It was the first episode I've seen so far, which was when it premiered after the beginning of South Park's 20th season, so odds are the it "might" get better(?), but for obvious reasons, I doubt it will. The characters are stereotypical to the point where they're not even characters, and the jokes are just immature for no reason. This is one legend that could've stayed a legend. Unfortunately, and somehow, this was renewed for a second season, before the premiere of it's first season, so yeah, there's that.

{UPDATE}

So far, I have seen every single episode as of October 19, 2016, like I'm a dang madman, and seeing as my review really only talked about the first episode, I decided to make an update to my review just to say "it still sucks" and add a few points. In fact, I believe the show wasted no time getting worse after the first episode since, in my opinion, the second episode had to be the worst one so far, and even with the best episode, which is the most recent on, the joke of Tupac being a stripper gets old fast. None of the characters are not likable, and I'm struggling to see the point in having Groover's brothers in the show, seeing as they only have a few seconds in most episodes. About the only thing that changed is that they no longer use their random slang, but that's it. Anyway, that was just a quick update, just to say nothing really hasn't changed, but instead got worse.
16 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Maybe if I was On Drugs...
4 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Let's admit, for every Rick & Morty, Boondocks, Venture Bros., etc. that's on Adult Swim, we have a bunch of shows that I call "stoner shows." This show, from the creator of a show I barely watched, China, Il, is definitely one of those shows. You can probably go on that assumption just by looking the opening and credit segments, which is more or less a bearded guy wearing nothing but golden chains, sneakers, a headband, and 'the shortest pair of shorts no guy should be wearing in public" dancing around in a rainbow hallway with a grin on his face. For some reason, I call this the best part of the show. The rest of the show is kind of mixed. You can find some things that are funny, but other times, it feels like a twelve year old has written it, then whenever there's a preview for another episode, such as the Bruce Willis skit previewed at the time of this review and "Stripper with a Booger," you pretty much saw part of the episode, with only a few seconds of it left. Such "classic" skits includes an almost terrifying "Cute Corner," some woman singing about the TV guide and a Big Bang marathon (on different episodes of course), Fruit Blood, some band that wears latex fetish suits and sings about random things like "roosters" (a replacement term for the word they actually used) and Cheetos on the floor, girls on bikes singing about buying beer, and a dog...well, let's just say it had something to do with a clock, hamburgers, and other random objects. One character of China, Il, Baby Cakes, does show up in one episode, which has him singing about his dead dog and hoping he's a ghost, which is kind of a sad concept in my opinion. Because yeah, that's all you need for a comedy show these days.

In all honesty, if all I described is actually funny to you, then odds are you'll like this show. However, if you require a little bit more from your jokes, then you can watch *random title of a comedy here* over this. A lot of shows and movies does either random or 12 year old humor a lot better than this, and you can find a better skit show than this, like Robot Chicken for example.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Adam Ruins Everything (2015–2019)
10/10
A Web Series Turned TV Show Which is the Best TruTV Has Now
30 August 2016
When I first heard of this show, this was just one of the few factoid shows TruTV had running along their "Internet Video" shows, a genre I definitely did NOT make up for those shows, such as World's Dumbest and Only Hurts When I Laugh and Impractical Jokers re-runs, both types of shows that show nearly everyday on the channel in today's time. The other two shows like it were Six Degrees to Everything, which was kind of boring, probably won't have a second season, and was hosted by two popular YouTubers that tried to trademark the word "React," and 10 Things, which was okay. This show was also a YouTube show under the channel College Humor, but unlike Six Degrees to Everything, this show is actually entertaining while having some educational value to it, and the presentation doesn't suck your soul through a straw, which was an issue I had with Six Degrees to Everything. It was a good thing that this show actually got a second season.

I've seen every episode since it launched, and so far, I haven't found a single episode that I didn't smile at, except for (obviously) the Death episode, which is a hard subject to talk about but was at least touching towards the end. One thing I like about the show is that while it's comical, it does have facts and provides sources to them, so you can do some fact checking if you wish. The main character himself, Adam Conover, is portrayed as an annoying, egotistical know-it-all hipster who pretty much talks in nothing but facts, and it actually makes him a likable character in the show. While I'm trying not to spoil the episodes themselves, they're mostly about Adam going around and (what else?) ruining their day with TRUTH.

Honestly, this is the best show that's on TruTV right now, especially if you're tired of the "Internet Video" shows and Impractical Jokers. I also noticed that, while TruTV still has their fair share of the previously mentioned shows, that the network is trying to be a little bit more experimental with their shows, and getting away from the reality repo shows that used to be on there, such as South Beach Tow and Lizard Lick Towing, because now they have a comedy game show, Comedy Knockout, Hack My Life, and a sitcom named Those Who Can't. So far, the only (small) problem I have with these shows is that they tend to stay close to comedy and isn't that true to the TruTV name, or what I would think what TruTV is meant (as in reality TV), but after having a bunch of shows that feel the same, these shows are kinda refreshing while having their own identity. I truly hope TruTV can continue finding different types of shows, and I also recommend watching this show on TV, or on YouTube since the episodes on the show are a few of those videos wrapped into one.
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good for the Second Half, Not for the First
11 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
As a disclaimer, I haven't read the original graphic novel. What all I read, which I could've just bought the thing, is the beginning of it. I was, however, interested in seeing this movie, because I do find the DC animated movies pretty good. They may not be the greatest things ever, but they're worth a watch, especially when one of them is probably the only good Teen Titans related piece of media we'll see, unless if they decide to make Teen Titans Action out of the blue.

With that said, I do have a huge problem with this movie, and it's mostly with the first thirty minutes. Even though I never read the original novel, which will be fixed sooner or later, I at least know that it has something to do with the Joker being in one of the most controversial book ever, I question if the first half wasn't in there just to make it movie length. The first thirty minutes of the movie is all about Batgirl and her taking down Paris Franz, who really tries to get into her pants (remember that part), and I got to admit, while it would've been better for it's own thing, it doesn't even tie in with the second half at all. You would think Paris would have something to do with the rest of the movie, but no, he's just a waste of script, and we already know that he's not that Joker simply by Barbara Gordon, a.k.a. Batgirl, saying that she was scared of him as a little girl from her father, good ole Jim Gordon, describing him to her, and also, while his real name is mostly unknown, I think the Arkham games has his name as Jack White. Seriously, why was this even put in the movie? They could've easily made a more in-depth backstory for the Joker, but instead, we get this random guy's journey to becoming the biggest crime boss, which will never be touched upon ever again in the second half, and there's a part of it where all I can say is "oh, hey feminists! Look, video games isn't the only piece of media objectifying women anymore." Speaking of the bad joke I just did, this is where the movie got the most backlash from, the sex scene. Most people hated this scene for making Batgirl a sex object and for messing with the relationship her and Batman had. For me, I already thought the first thirty minutes was worthless, and this happened within those first few minutes. I guess you could say that they put these first thirty minutes in there to give Barbara Gordon a reason to be in the movie, but why not have her in another movie instead of having her be Batgirl, quitting, getting paralyzed before being striped naked for a photo shoot, and then becoming Oracle? So yeah, with that rant over, I recommend skipping the first thirty minutes of the movie. It's pointless, trivial, never gets touched upon ever again, and doesn't mesh with the rest of the movie.

The second half, however, is where you get the story from the graphic novel, and it's a pretty good story. It's mostly a Joker story, and I can't knock it for being so. Might even provide the critics, the ones who said Suicide Squad didn't have enough of him, get their fix. Since this movie is based on a very dark graphic novel, you can expect a pretty messed up Joker, who is excellently voiced by Mark Hamill who might as well be called the "definitive voice of the Joker since the Animated Series," and like I mention earlier with the spoilers, he does some messed up things. What I really like about the second half is that the movie takes a look at the Joker's past as a failing comedian whose simply trying to make a better life for his soon-to-be family, in which he resorts to doing a "job" with two other men and goes crazy after losing his wife and accidentally taking a chemical bath. As I said, if they really needed to lengthen the movie, they could've easily made a more in-depth backstory for the beginning instead of Batgirl since this is essentially a Joker movie anyway. Even the second half starts off with a murder scene where it looks like everybody was happy to be a part of, and the Batman doesn't have as much screen time as the Joker, at least until the end anyway. I will also say that the imagery can be quite unsettling at time with the harsh shadows. Heck, when Joker was about to shoot Barbara Gordon, all I can imagine was someone waking up with the Joker face two inches away from their eyeballs as the Joker says "I have killed your family, and now I will kill now." The art-style, as for usual for the DC animated movies, is pretty good, though I admit that this one does seem have lower frame counts on some scene, which is weird that I mentioned it, because I usually reserve that con for video games since it's more effective there. It's not a huge issue, it's not it's like a glaring flaw or anything, but it is something you tend to notice.

I recommend giving this movie at least a rental. I believe the darker tale told in the second half is really good, but the movie is like Steam's Greenlight System. You have to shovel through junk just to get to the good part, and while the movie isn't as bad as the Steam Greenlight System, not by a long shot, the first thirty minutes will make you question why you're watching the movie in the first place.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Until Dawn (2015 Video Game)
8/10
A Cult Classic
22 July 2016
So, what do you get when a David Cage game goes wrong and turns into a horror flick? Well, you get this game. Really, these are the types of games I normally don't play, as I really view these as "interactive fiction" more than a game, even though this one is more akin to old adventure games you play on PC. In this style of game, though, I think the horror aspect of it helps it out.

One reason I think that is that controls are limited, and that's fine by me. All you really have in this game is a walking stick and an interact button. You barely have control of the camera, but the in- game camera angles aren't that bad. Just think of it as early Resident Evil with no weapons or zombies. Some places do have you ping-ponging from one wall to another, but with this game, it's not necessarily a big concern. Heck, most of the is just interacting and quick time events anyway.

Now, when it comes to story, what would you think about when you think about most horror movies? Bunch of teenagers? Check! Jumpscares? Check! A guy, or thing, just "making a killing" somewhere? Check, and I apologize for the pun. Couldn't resist! Anyway, as you can tell, this game plays a lot with horror movie tropes, but it's still a lot of fun to play through, even when you can choose, or be punished in some ways, what happens to the characters. In fact, it is possible to keep all the characters alive, at least the ones after the beginning of the game, during their return stay at a cabin, a year after a death of a few friends, gone horribly wrong, and the butterfly effect can cause for some interesting changes. Another mechanic, though playing a smaller part, is the way the game learns about your fears. After some chapters, you meet a psychologist name Dr. Alan Hill, and his involvement is pretty much asking you questions, such as how you feel for the characters. I don't want to spoil too much, but I can say that whoever plays his roll, it feels like he had some fun playing the role. In fact, all the characters were acted perfectly, even the guy from the show Mr. Show. Overall, story is just a campy horror story, but it's fun to play through. The jump scares do get tiring after a while, but it can keep you along for the ride easily.

Now, the best part of the game is the graphics, and let me tell you, if the developers tried to make it anymore realistic looking than it does now, the PlayStation 4 might've not been able to run it. It's just that good looking. What helps even more is that the faces were motion captured, and the actors did an excellent job with making the characters look real. Still better than Cole Phelps performance on L.A. Noire, which wasn't bad but just felt like the actor was nervous at some parts, and I'm glad none of the characters were like that.

While I wouldn't have recommended the game while it was at $60, this is worth at least checking out. This is the only game of it's kind I felt like buying, as I really wasn't a fan of the David Cage games, but this was the one exception I made. If you find it at a good price, get it. It's also worth noting that it does have PlayStation Camera functionality, but before you go out and buy one, just know it just record your reaction to a jump scare, which thinking about it now, that's a bit creepy.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rick and Morty (2013– )
10/10
One of Adult Swim's Priceless Gems
22 July 2016
This is a great show. This show about a socially awkward boy, Morty, exploring these absurd universes with his drunk, scientist grandfather, Rick, has some great stories, a good art style, awesome characters, and mostly of all, the humor is on point. Even the side characters, such as Mr. Meeseeks and Birdperson, never fail to put a smile on my face. I think the lowest point of the show is actually Pocket Mortys, and while that's just a free-to-play Pokémon clone, and even that wasn't too bad, just wasn't my cup of tea. Other than that, the only problem I can think of, and it might be a bit of a nitpick, but the seasons so far are kinda short. Season 1 was eleven episodes, while season 2 was ten episodes and ended on a cliff hanger. Really, not a big issue, but as of the time of writing this review, we're still waiting on season 3. Might be a short review, but really, what else can you say other than that "it's a great show." Now if you excuse me, I got a season 3 to wait for.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Family Guy (1999– )
1/10
Was Good in the Earlier Seasons, But Now??? (Mostly Today's Family Guy)
20 July 2016
This is one of those shows where I wonder why it's still on. Honestly, I was a fan of the show back in the day. Of course, that was back in my high school days, maybe Jr. high, but now, it just feels like they shouldn't bother. There's going to be a lot of comparisons, .

I'll start off easy with the least offensive part of the review, while the animation is cleaned up compared to older seasons, I feel that the older seasons had better animation. It's not that the studio isn't capable of doing better animation, they had some times where they had great animation on a segment or two, but today's Family Guy just has some stiff animation, in what's essentially only a few frames of movement per minute. I can chalk this up to a more "efficient" way of animating, but I think I would prefer the pen and paper approach, as the characters actually seem more alive.

Now, I'll talk about the episodes themselves. See, back in the day, the Griffins actually felt like they were a family, and they were likable while having good stories and decent jokes to boot. In fact, if I was gonna give a story-stupid joke ratio, I would say it would be a 80- 20, mostly because when they did the stupid jokes, they were actually sort of funny and didn't go as far as to joke about celebrities. Today's Family Guy,the characters are just so unlikable, to the point where they can actually make you mad. Stewie going from evil baby genius to gay baby, Peter going from a dumb but caring father to a retard that only cares about himself, and Meg, who was just a teenage girl that wasn't the most popular, being turned into a punching bag. Those are only just a few examples, but I can't name any character that is even remotely likable. It doesn't help that the story-stupid joke ratio is now switched around, almost to where you forget what the episode is about, and the jokes that are on there are just random flashbacks or cutaways that make no sense to even have. It just feels like Seth is just running out of ideas, and it shows.

My biggest problem with the show is that it just tries so hard to be offensive, but instead of doing so, it's just wasting their own time. If I want to watch a show of offensive jokes, I'd watch Robot Chicken. Jokes about terminal illnesses? Check! Random acts of violence, some that could even kill characters? Check! There are even celebrity jokes that are, instead of just being silly, are just mean spirited, and I don't even like most celebrities. Then we a brief moment of time where Brian is dead for like two episodes, I guess to bring more attention to the show despite it just being desperate, and an episode where there was an abusive relationship, despite the fact that the characters cause domestic violence all the time which should've made the show not qualified for talking about such a serious topic.

If there is one word I can really call this show now, it's "desperate." That's the only reason why it sucks now. It's just so desperate. Even South Park, a show that has almost if not the exact same amount of time on air as Family Guy, isn't as desperate as this show. In fact, at least South Park can keep a consistent story and still have some funny jokes, and it seems to be doing well these years by gaining a good game for the franchise, while getting a sequel to said game. The show is still relevant while Family Guy isn't. Fox somehow thinks differently and still keeps this show on air. Family Guy had a good run, but it's clear that they are just running out of ideas. I usually don't wish a show to be cancelled, but in this case, Fox needs to get rid of it and find the next big thing.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Green Room (2015)
3/10
Not Interesting At All
16 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I never really heard of this movie until I saw it a Redbox. With the reviews I read online, I was led to believe that it would be a good movie, but honestly, I wasn't even close to hooked. The story is about a punk rock band simply trying to find a good paying gig but end up being trapped with murderous skinheads after seeing a dead body. Honestly, from the concept alone, it scores points in being more original than other horror movies, assuming we're all tired of stereotypical teenagers fleeing from a murderous psychopath, but that's about the most good I can find out of this movie.

The story was just too boring, and the voice acting is hard to love. Not saying it's mostly bad acting, Patrick Stewart done a decent job as the owner of a skinhead bar, but the others just sound so monotone to me that sometimes I wonder if they're just not high throughout the whole movie. What also hurts the movie is that there wasn't much of a reason to care about these characters, and there was hardly any character development. Heck, I couldn't remember which of the characters were in the movie in the beginning, so that tells you how badly written the characters are. All this is also bundled with a story that turns out to be a drag. Other than the ways some of the characters were killed, I can hardly remember anything of it.

Overall, it's just flat out forgettable and was not even worth the rental. I didn't see why this movie had so much praise, and I SURELY don't recommend it.
58 out of 114 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mighty No. 9 (2016 Video Game)
3/10
A Mighty Flop that Makes You Feel Like an Anime Fan on Prom Night
7 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
All references aside, this game would've been great if it wasn't so frustrating with many bad design choices. There are even choices that happened during the Kickstarter of the game that were questionable. In fact, they might as well make a documentary called "How Not To Do A Kickstarter." Originally to be released in June 2015, the game was delayed multiple times, sometimes for reasons like multiplayer, which I'm not sure many people knew it had. They also tried to Kickstart another project while this was in development, which unsurprisingly failed, and are now developing Microsoft exclusive ReCore. It's also supposed to be released on ten platforms, and the backers of the game did not get the right codes they asked for, let alone getting the game after the critics. Now, I'm not reviewing the story of the campaign, but from all that, it should give you an idea of how this four million dollar train wreck will be.

First up, the graphics are pretty...bleh. It looks like something made for a PlayStation 2 than it does a game for today's time. Now, I usually don't have a problem with this type of issue, but I should also add that the presentation is as cheap as a dollar store cell phone charger. Seriously, the cutscenes barely have any animation to them, other than rock back and forth, hang mouth open, and in Call's case, stare into your soul (I know she's a robot, but that girl looks dead through out). For four million dollars, it doesn't look as good as Dust an Elysian Tail, which was 40k in budget, made by one guy, and looks like a Disney movie.

Gameplay-wise, it's mostly okay. Though not as hard as MegaMan, which this game is trying to be, it can be a fun time at some points, and it also controls well. There are, however, some caveats with it, though. While it's true it's not as hard, it can have some moments of being cheap in level design, especially with the instant kill spikes. The bosses also have the same problems as they can have near instant death moves. It's also kinda cryptic with some of it's mechanics, such as buffs, use of health packs (which are barely dropped unlike MegaMan), and the fact that if you press R2/RT and the fire button, you can do a backstop shot. Speaking of which, switching between power-ups is a chore. You have to stop and cycle through the powers one by one, instead of a wheel that can be quicker to use. This, unless if you assign quick switches through the options menu, is tedious and takes too much time, especially in boss fights. Overall, the gameplay can be fast and fun, but it just so flawed.

Sound is also...bleh. While the retro BGM can help with this issue, I find the music hard to remember. The voice acting in the game is also...bleh. It ranges from corny, if lucky, to just flat out boring, especially Call who really sounds robotic. I also "love it" when the Mighty Numbers have some "creative" puns to say like "'Ice' to see you" and "flush Mighty No 2 (actual in-game line after beating Pyro and facing Cryo)."

Story is just "meh" enough for the game. What else can you ask for a game where you take down eight bosses then play the final levels? The story is mostly mediocre, but I really wasn't expecting a great story for it, and not a whole lot happens other than saving the other Mighty Numbers. There is a stage where you play as Call (you remember, that girl with the personally of a ceder oak and stares into your soul?), but the stage is really boring, even the boss fight is ridiculously easy if you know what to do, maybe even the easiest in the game.

The worst flaw was the way the game is optimized, and I just happen to have the best version, being the PC, and it still has framedrops in it despite the PC being above the recommended specs, and all because of pizza fire. In fact, the most notable issue is that there are reports (though I can't confirm since I don't want to rebuy the game) that the game can brick a Wii U. I doubt that is the case, but there are crashes on that platform none-the-less. It just makes me wonder how the portable version (PlayStation Vita, Nintendo 3DS, and I think Nvidia Shield was another one) fare, if they do that is.

I wouldn't recommend buying this game. If you want a good MegaMan game, then get the Legacy Collection, which has six of the original games on it. There's also an Early Access game (never thought I recommend one of those) called 20XX, which is a good MegaMan-like rougelike that's currently twelve bucks. Just stay away from this until they iron it out some, or if it's on a dang good sale.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gone Home (2013 Video Game)
2/10
Not Worth the Dough
7 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I'll only give this review the time it takes to finish the game, so it will be pretty short.

The game is only a walking simulator for the most part. The setting the game has is pretty good, and I will admit, there were times I felt uneasy going through the house, especially knowing that the place is (or was at one time) haunted by the main character's uncle. I find the story of the house interesting at first, but not the main story, which is just a same sex relationship the main character's sister is having. In fact, the haunting part of the story is barely presented, unless if I didn't look through every nook and cranny the game had. It just felt pointless, along with the other stories in the game. I even feel like the ending was lacking in some ways, so the interesting story the house was telling through clues you have to find is just...bleh. Overall, not the greatest game in that regard, even though it tried at least.

My biggest problem is that once you finish it, you can replay the game, and it will only take a minute of your time. There's even a trophy for beating it in under a minute. This makes me glad I didn't pay for the game, instead getting it on PlayStation Plus. I don't recommend this game at the price tag of twenty bucks, as it's pretty much one of those throw-away games. You play it once, and you're done, with nothing else to do. Not worth it!
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed