Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Ed Wood Lives!!!
26 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I love this film, OK I love it for the wrong reasons but I love it all the same. The plot is simple, a nasty businessman has installed a trans Pacific cable with dodgy insulation. So what you may say, well the electric field has lured something from the depths that has shown up on the coast of Mexico and is eating surfers like food is going out of fashion.

Enter the hero's, John Barrowman playing it hetro and macho as the square jawed clean cut life guard, the 'pretty with brains to match' lady marine biologist and the gungo-ho mini-sub driving ex-marine.

However they soon find out that the big fish they snuff early on in the film is just a baby, and mummy, all 70+ feet of prehistoric rage is coming back for revenge....

The result is every shark cliché you can think of re-cycled with lots of blood and guts into an hour and a half of so bad its fantastic viewing. The highlights being the very bad matting fx whenever the mummy sharks takes a bite at anything passing.

Art this isn't, but for lovers of bad movies this is a must see.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad at all...
19 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I went to see this with a gut feeling that it would not live up to the hype. However I found Snakes On A Plane better than I thought, yes its a brainless Samuel L Jackson vehicle, but it is not without merits. The plot (A witness to a gang execution is being flown from Honalulu to LA to give evidence with Samuel L as escort) is simple and basically serves as an excuse to fill a 747 with a load of snakes. The rest of the film is sort of cross between a disaster flick and a horror b-movie. Loads of annoying people get bitten and in some cases eaten and some other annoying people are saved by good old Samuel L. (Athough I wish at least one of the cute kiddies could have got it!!) However it is well done and the snakes do indeed come over with a touch of menace about them and there are some nice set pieces such as the mile high club couple, the death of the yappie dog and the bloke with a snake bitten cock.

Don't go to see this film expecting high entertainment, but if it's some laugh out loud and make yer jump easy going entertainment you crave then this film is well worth a glance, even if the ending is very predictable.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Very British Kind of Movie.
23 July 2006
There is a fundamental difference between British and American war movies of the 1950's and 60's. Where as Hollywoods output tends to have gung-ho heroes gun in each hand, knife in the teeth, winning the war for Uncle Sam and getting the girl to boot, the British war movie tended towards a more factual almost documentary style. Almost as if British cinema was saying 'something of great importance has recently happened, so lets document the facts for future generations lest we forget.' Hence we have films like Dunkirk, Sink The Bismark, Battle of The River Plate and most famously of all The Damn Busters.

Coming back to this movie 54 years after it was made and over 60 since the events portrayed this movie can at time seam rather odd. The acting is stilted and dialogue clipped, but this is a stylistic thing rather than bad acting, after all the same style of acting can be witnessed in Ealling Comedies, the proto-hammer horror films and any number of 'The Blue Lamp' type police films. The bulk of the cinematography is also nothing special, being straightforward 'one' or 'two' shots with lighting that can be described as bog standard.

However this film really scores on two fronts. Firstly the use of real true to era aircraft (Leased from the RAF who still used Lancasters as trainers at the time) flown by genuine RAF bomber crews and filmed using the various lakes around Cumberland and West Yorkshire where the real 617 squadron trained for the real mission. And secondly it's dogged sticking to historical detail, or at least as much that could be adhered to without breaking the official secrets act!! There is no Pearl Harbour rewriting of history here. What you see is as near as damn it what really happened. Even now the a comparison of the attack as portrayed on film and the most recently published accounts of the raid as released by the British ministry of defence show very few factual flaws.

Also it must be born in mind that the early 1950's were not a pleasant time for the UK populous. The nation was still crippled by US war debt, many items were still rationed and the teething pains of the change that would lead to the welfare state and the cultural and economic boom of the 1960's were still cutting deep. So it is hardly surprising that a film showing a heroic and resourceful Britian would strike such a strong chord with its viewers.

I must be said some aspects of this film haven't aged well compared to some of the other Brit war flicks of the time ('Battle Of The River Plate' springs to mind), but as a historical document and comment on Britian in the immediate post war era it stands tall as one of the most important films of its time.
45 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Up 'n' Under (1998)
7/10
Watchable Fun
23 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Yup it's northern Brit comedy time. This time it's a inept pub Rugby League side that must struggle through adversity and come up triumphant. Yes it has been done before (The Full Monty, Brassed Off et al.), but that doesn't mean this film is without merit.

For a start we see two great Brit actors in their last ever screen roles (Gary Olsen from the sitcom 'Two Point Four Children' and Brian Glover of 'Kez' and 'Alien 3' fame). We get to see the loverly Samantha Janus san clothing, and by the numbers but still entertaining performance from Neil 'Men Behaving Badly' Morissey. Throw in Griff Rhys Jones doing a damn fine Eddie Warring impression and Tony Slattery as a suitably evil baddie who will even fix the draw of a rugby tournament to humiliate our heroes (THAT'S how they reached the final of the competition, do some of these reviewers even bother to watch the films?); and some good cameos from the likes of Michelle Tulley and you have something that can put a smile on most faces without requiring to much effort to watch.

Also credit must be given to writer / director John Godber (adapted from his own stage play of some 10 years earlier and recently revived on stage with England Rugby Union star Gareth Chilcott in the Gary Olsen role).

All in all an enjoyable effort.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Falling Down (1993)
8/10
What Price The American Dream?
23 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
America, land of opportunity, a place where all men are equal under god. All well and good, but in this film Joel Schumacher gives us a long hard look at the underbelly of American society, and the view isn't nice.

In a society so in love with it's cars it has grid locked itself we encounter William 'D-Fens' Foster (Michael Douglas), a man who's American dream has been shattered. Estranged from his family, jobless and cruising for a nervous breakdown a former hero and a man who has worked (in the words of his on screen mother) 'Designing weapons to keep us safe from the communists', hits breaking point, snaps and sets out on a journey through the dark underbelly of capitalist society in an attempt to a home that for him no longer exists.

We see a society where small business can vastly inflate their prices in the name of profit, where corporate food franchises sacrifice customer service and quality of produce on the alter of a branded image and false smiles. A society where racism and homophobia are allowed to flourish in the name of free speech and gangs are prepared to massacre in the name honour to protect a few acres of wasteland whilst the rich spend time and resources playing golf and protecting their property with barbed wire in an effort to keep the underclass out of sight nd out of mind.

Through this mess stalks Douglas, asking the awkward questions, dealing the roughest form of justice and fighting just to survive in the sea of capitalist excess.

Counterpoint this with Robert Duvall as Prenderghast, a mild mannered cop on his last day on the job. Here is a man for whom the American dream has worked. He loves his menopausal wife, likes his job and is looking to retire to Arizona his life's work well done. Prenderghast is the polar opposite of Foster, he likes to talk (in the film he fires one shot compared to hundreds of rounds Foster fires off) and does hes damnedest to keep the American dream intact for everyone.

Don't get me wrong, this film is not anti-American, or anti-capitalist or anti-western, but it does ask some pointed questions and intelligently leaves the viewer to give his own answers. Add in the fact that is film is very well made, with some superb pacey editing, and some wonderfully claustrophobic atmospherics and two fine performances from Douglas and Duvall and you have a true gem of modern cinema that stands up to repeated viewings. Highly recommended.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hitcher (1986)
8/10
One Helluva Road Movie
17 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I still can't work out if this a road movie with a serial in it, or a serial killer flick that is disguised as a road movie. Whatever genre it fits into it's a blinder. C. Thomas Howells plays your average American teenager paid to dive a car to California and on the way he just happens to encounter a certain Rutger Hauer, who is hitching across the country leaving a trail of slaughter is his wake. Cue lots of blood, scares and mindless violence as Hauer attempts to frame our hero for his crimes and Howells tries to survive and make big bad Rutger pay for his crimes.

OK your saying, so what, it's good guy vs bad guy flick. But my friend what makes the Hitcher stand proud above other films of this type is the way it bucks trends. For a start, our hero doesn't get the girl, any hint of a sickening romantic sub-plot is snuffed out about half way through the film by Hauer with the aid of a large articulated lorry, and the final confrontation between the hero and villain is raw and brutal; and whilst the good guy wins in the end, we never do find out if he gets off the hook for all the previous murders that he is being framed for. All of which makes for a refreshing change from the standard fayre.

The performances, especially from Hauer and Howells are well realised and well rounded and the cinematography and editing nigh on faultless. In short a superb little thriller that stands up to repeated viewing. Highly recommended.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Vincents Finest Hour and a Half
16 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Vincent Price hams it up as Edward Lionheart, a classical actor snubbed by a circle of theatre critics for a major award who returns from the grave to seek bloody revenge on those who ruined his career, taking his cues from the works of the Bard of Stratford himself.

If ever there was a role that Price was born to play, then this is it. From the moment he first appears on screen, disguised as a very cleched British bobby to his final plunge to a fiery death in a disused theatre whilst quoting from King Lear he dominates the screen, his sonorous tones and OTT expressions stealing every scene. I have lost count of the number of time I have watched this film and never tire of seeing a true master at work. His overly camp posturing and dry one liners never fail to enthral and entertain.

But a brilliant leading role does not on its own a great film make; and Price is ably assisted by the likes of Diana Rigg, Arthur Lowe, Eric Skyes, Michael Holden and Diana Dorrs amongst others who all act their collective socks off. The result is a film that is jammed to the gunnels with black humour, buckles swash and nasty deaths that is perfectly paced, intelligently writain and a must for horror fans of all ages.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Where it all began... Man!!
10 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
OK Glastonbury, one of the worlds biggest live music festivals, huge big name acts, fantastic light shows, tens of thousands of screaming teens..... err no. This is Glastonbury before the corporate bread-heads got there man. When it was FREE to go man, the music was everything man and there were no toilets. (The trick was to eat a dozen eggs before you went, eat as little as possible whilst your there and have the laxatives on standby for when you got home... I know, I used to goto Stonehenge back in the day) Yup, this film is a bog standard look at a typical small hippy fest in early 1970s. A few thousand heads, flower children and bikers gather on a small Somerset farm and grove around to the sounds of Gong, Arthur Brown and Fairport Convention amongst others; take acid, smoke pot and drink the local cider.

Sadly legal reasons meant that David Bowies headline set had to be cut from the film and a few other performing acts such as the legendary Hawkwind ended up on the cutting room floor, but on the whole the performances are good, Traffic and the aforementioned Fairport Convention being the highlights.

It's not quite Woodstock, or Monterray Pop, but worth a glance if the hippy movement is your thing...... Man.
24 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Godzilla (I) (1998)
1/10
A complete waste of celluloid
9 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Oh dear. There are some films that probably seemed like a good idea at the time but with the cold hard light of hindsight shouldn't have ever been made. The complete waste of time is a case in point. Forget all the camp action of the classic Toho Godzilla cycle; there is no thinly veiled post Hirosima nuclear paranoia here, no guys in rubber monster suits jumping on plastic kit tanks and swatting 1:72 scale jet fighters off wires. Instead we are faced with some impressive but sadly predictable set piece action sequences, Matthew Boderick with a sickening romantic sub plot, Jean Reno on auto pilot saving the day and Jeff Goldblum rehashing his role from Independence Day and not really giving a damn. In fact this film IS Independence Day but with a large lizard replacing the evil aliens. And yes, just like every other Robert Emmerich film, the good guys win. They zap Big G with the aid of a couple of subs and the Brooklyn Bridge, blitz Godzilla's nest (of course leaving an opening for a sequel) and go home for a slice of 'Moms Apple Pie'. This film not only lacks the camp humour of the Toho originals, but also misses the point of the doomsday monster as mankind's indestructible nemeses, alway there to return to make humanity pay for his crimes against nature. Inshort avoid like the plague.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A rare gem
27 May 2006
Take a wise cracking thirteen year old kid whose elder brother is an inept gumshoe, a host of classic British Actors (Jimmy Nail, Susannah York, Saeed Jaffrey, Roy Kinnear) amongst others, an intelligent plot and witty script from the pen of Anthony Horowitz (based on his own novel 'The Falcons Malteser'), a cult - and rather obscure - Brit heavy rock band (Mammoth) to play a gang of heavies; film it around North London in a classic film noir style and sprinkle with a cartload of tongue in cheek references to some of the greatest noir thrillers of all time and you have cooked up a rather tasty family friendly film that is a real joy to watch.

This film works on so many levels, it's well paced with so great moments of slap stick (such as the dropping of a grand piano onto a van full of bad guys) and full of crooks cartoony enough to entertain the kiddies, yet at the same time if full of enough references and in jokes to movies such as Kiss Me Deadly, Cassablanca and (of course) The Maltese Falcon to keep the hardened film buff entertained for hours.

This is the kind of left field quirky comedy that the British do best and is well worth 94 minutes of anybodies day to watch.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Passing (1983)
8/10
Hats off to a brave effort
8 May 2006
Not the best film in the world. The lighting is poor, he acting wooden and the plot, although interesting is buried in a pile of ham-fisted direction. BUT, when you consider this film was made on a the sort of budget that would cover an assistant sparky's wages on a Tom Cruise movie using minimal equipment, by a bunch of part timers, you have to give them high marks for an ambitious effort that just manages to keep the right side of interesting from beginning to end.

Indeed there is enough art house style camera work, cleaver use of a 78 RPM soundtrack, and fairly natural dialogue to make the whole 90 minutes a worth while watch; provided you are able to over look the restrictions of the minute budget. Add in some blackly funny Stan and Ollie type moments, such as the suicide by gas cooker sequence, and the result is a film that has cult classic scrawled all over it.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed