Almost until the very end, I had a pretty good attitude to the film, such a solid seven out of ten. But still, even such an amazing cast of Eric Bana, Olivia Wilde, Charlie Hunnam, and Kate Mara could not stretch the plot to the level that it could reach, if the screenwriter paid more attention to the motivation of the characters.
The story is interesting - brother and sister are separated on the run having a common endpoint because they need to cross the border. We are immediately shown that the relationship here is a little more than just a simple siblings relationship; they were always alone, two souls are broken by a cruel father who found solace in each other.
But the sister decided to move away from her brother and fell in love and the brother didn't like that, or rather, in this he saw the end of their great escape story.
But why in the movie, besides their relationship, we don't get to know more about others? They threw a couple of interesting stories like the police Hannah (Kate Mara), whom her father humiliates and ignores at work, where she also regularly receives a notable portion of sexism; boxer Jay (Charlie Hunnam), about which for the entire film we were given only a couple of characteristics, such as "he is a boxer" and "he was in prison." Well, and the fact that he is a good and honest guy (well, it's true even though he accidentally broke the skull of his boss).
But I can forgive all this if not for the ending. The antagonist Addison, perfectly played by Eric Bana, we understand and even empathize with him in a couple of moments, because he is humane, took care of the family that random stepfather tormented and so on. His sister (Olivia Wilde), who after one night stand fell in love with a guy and decided to leave her brother and generally become an exemplary member of society, we already understand a bit less. Boxer Jay, who, after sex with a girl (I understand that he had not had sex in prison for a long time), knowing that she is a little crazy and has a little more than just siblings ties with her brother, says that he loves her, we don't understand at all.
Well, the logic at the end suffered a bit. But an open-end? What happened to the characters, because in theory, they should all be in prison for their actions? Why didn't they give us at least a hint of what will happen? After all, if the main theme of the film was still only the relationship between brother and sister, and therefore it was all over, I do not quite understand why it was necessary to focus on the history of the boxer guy.
Be that as it may, I do not regret that I watched it - the landscapes in the movie are amazing. A picture in which all the scenes are snowy always catches a little more.
The story is interesting - brother and sister are separated on the run having a common endpoint because they need to cross the border. We are immediately shown that the relationship here is a little more than just a simple siblings relationship; they were always alone, two souls are broken by a cruel father who found solace in each other.
But the sister decided to move away from her brother and fell in love and the brother didn't like that, or rather, in this he saw the end of their great escape story.
But why in the movie, besides their relationship, we don't get to know more about others? They threw a couple of interesting stories like the police Hannah (Kate Mara), whom her father humiliates and ignores at work, where she also regularly receives a notable portion of sexism; boxer Jay (Charlie Hunnam), about which for the entire film we were given only a couple of characteristics, such as "he is a boxer" and "he was in prison." Well, and the fact that he is a good and honest guy (well, it's true even though he accidentally broke the skull of his boss).
But I can forgive all this if not for the ending. The antagonist Addison, perfectly played by Eric Bana, we understand and even empathize with him in a couple of moments, because he is humane, took care of the family that random stepfather tormented and so on. His sister (Olivia Wilde), who after one night stand fell in love with a guy and decided to leave her brother and generally become an exemplary member of society, we already understand a bit less. Boxer Jay, who, after sex with a girl (I understand that he had not had sex in prison for a long time), knowing that she is a little crazy and has a little more than just siblings ties with her brother, says that he loves her, we don't understand at all.
Well, the logic at the end suffered a bit. But an open-end? What happened to the characters, because in theory, they should all be in prison for their actions? Why didn't they give us at least a hint of what will happen? After all, if the main theme of the film was still only the relationship between brother and sister, and therefore it was all over, I do not quite understand why it was necessary to focus on the history of the boxer guy.
Be that as it may, I do not regret that I watched it - the landscapes in the movie are amazing. A picture in which all the scenes are snowy always catches a little more.
Tell Your Friends