Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Tut (2015)
4/10
Lackluster potboiler.
1 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Eh... the best I can say: it was good to see Tut and Ancient Egypt finally get a little attention that doesn't involve walking mummies or biblical myths. Avan Jogia as the young pharaoh was perfectly cast and did well considering the material he was given. He's really the only standout in this otherwise mundane melodrama. I thought the production values were passable for a third-tier cable channel, but all of the usual failings were on full display: no history, bad costumes, worse locations, and indifferent writing. Be warned, this series is not a history lesson. Akhenaten, Tut's father, did not die in Thebes, but in the city of Amarna. Tut did not try and continue his father's monotheism; in fact the only remarkable act of his reign was to return Egypt to the old gods. (Spoilers!) And Horemheb would never have contemplated leaving a wounded Tut behind on a battlefield, even wanting him dead, it was simply impossible to return to Egypt without the pharaoh's body---he was worshiped as a god, after all, and a proper burial of his body was crucial to the Egyptian identity. If a general came back from war without the king, dead or alive, well... no amount of explaining would've saved his head. And "Amun" (the chief god of Egypt) as the name of the high priest!?! How many popes do you know named "Jehovah?" Really stupid choice, there. As for the look of the show: I suppose it must be difficult and costly to find or make jewelry that actually looks like the stuff from Tut's tomb, rather than the crude, clumsy junk seen here. And I very much wish producers and directors would STOP using Morocco as a stand-in for Egypt. The two countries look no more alike than Alaska does Hawaii. And my final gripe: Mitanni was hundreds of miles away from Egypt and in those days would take months, possibly even a year to reach; the series gives the impression it was right next door.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Clunky 80's melodrama
29 March 2017
A decent script suffers from truly awful production values and lousy editing. The cheap, pasteboard sets (often merely a sound stage with curtains or lighting filling in for walls) the lousy sound (lots of stage echoes), and questionable costume choices (no, they did not dress like ancient Egyptian tomb paintings) all combine to undermine what is, by itself, a fascinating romp among some of history's most ruthless royals: the ever-murderous Ptolemies of Egypt. The acting is uneven and pales when compared to the much superior I, Claudius, of which this farce was obviously intended to mimic. If the viewer can overlook the choppy editing and poor production standards, the story itself becomes quite entertaining. I would love to see this series done better. At least the idea was sound---an Egyptian version of I, Claudius---but it's a shame the BBC put so little faith or investment into it.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed