Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
A difficult film to watch
11 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
There's absolutely no way I can write about this film without a spoiler, as I think, judging from the comments written up on this site, many seem to have difficulty following the plot. As a general guide, if you're having difficulty following the chronological order of the scenes, it's necessary to follow the changes in color of Clementine's (Kate Winslet) hair. It starts off green, then changes to orange and finally finishes up blue. In the film though, it starts off blue, then goes to orange (the predominant color), then green and then back to blue.

I must say I watched the film with a certain level of discomfort, being constantly reminded of my own break-up. This wasn't helped by my feeling that the Joel character (Jim Carrey) was very similar to myself. The film challenged me to re-evaluate many of the memories I have which I'd purposely buried. This is the dominant theme of the film: our memories and our relationship to them.

The film starts as Joel wakes up one morning feeling awful. It's Valentine's day (his comments about which remind me of things I myself have said). His day simply improves when he discovers someone's smashed in the side of his car, and by the time he gets to the train station he's in such a funk that instead of going to work he impulsively jumps on a train to Montau and later calls in sick. But there he meets someone and they click.

Although we've already seen 15 minutes of the movie, it's at this point that the credits kick in and we watch Joel driving alone in anguish. It soon becomes apparent that Joel and Clementine have just split. Joel is driving home to forget about Clementine forever. He's told by his friends that Clementine's just had him permanently erased from her memory, (a new service offered by a company called Lacuna). So Joel volunteers himself. The company offers to wipe his mind in the comfort of his own home, but during the process Joel in a dreamlike state gets to visit all the recesses of his own memory. At first all we see between the couple is the senseless bickering and the ghastly fights that led up to the breakdown. But then he suddenly comes across a forgotten memory where the couple shared a single tender moment and he remembers his love for her. At this point he starts fighting to save the moment. He tries a number of different stratagems, such as trying to wake himself up, and associating her with memories from his childhood. At first he has some success, but when the "erasure men" hunt down even these memories he's forced to find ever more buried and ever deeper parts of his subconsciousness. But even in the parts of his memory that Joel has almost forgotten himself, the memory of Clementine is systematically rooted out and destroyed.

Most poignant for me is probably the way the film portrays our desire to forget, so that we can block out the mind-numbing pain. When Joel is told to collect together all the things that may remind him of Clementine, he collects together two black bin liners full of stuff; I remember the ambivalence I felt to many of the things I myself once had (and coincidentally I also have a photograph from when my ex was about 8). Another point which touched me was the portrayal of the Eakin's (the mutual friends of Joel and Clementine who'd introduced them.) We see them arguing openly in front of their friends, slowly destroying their own marriage, which in the light of what's happened between Joel and Clementine looks like infinite folly. The film clearly shows the way in which we tend to ignore and take for granted the love we have for our partners and then how we often only realize after being rudely reminded by the pain of separation.

The final scene is when both Joel and Clementine have found out that they had once been lovers. Joel is sitting at home and listening to the tape from his case file. Clementine, on hearing some of the mean things that Joel had told the "doctors" about her, runs away. Joel runs after her and begs her to stay. This is juxtaposed with their real first meeting where the roles were reversed and Joel was the one to chicken out. The relationship starts anew.

Jim Carrey's performance was absolutely stunning. I would never have dreamed that he could play a shy, reserved and introverted man with both subtlety and compassion.
44 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
More effective than electro-shock therapy
8 December 2005
I know, Iknow, I am in a minority but I feel compelled to write (for the first time ever) because this film is rubbish in comparison to the original. Yes I do mean RUBBISH, GARBAGE or whatever else you may care to call it. I've rated it a two because if you just want to see Arnie flex his muscles, grunt in an Austrian accent, and generally shoot the place up, I'd have to give it 10 out of 10 and if I was then to say that the special effects were way ahead of their time, why I'd go so far as to give it a 12. The plot's well paced, the acting is good and it makes a decent mindless action film. However this is NOT what I want from a movie, not even an Arnie number.

Much of my disappointment is probably due to the time I saw the first film. I will never forget the fear I felt of the implacable terminator ruthlessly tracking ITS prey without regard for anything but fulfilling ITS programmed objectives. The first Terminator film now looks dated beyond belief, but it was way, way ahead of its time. Nonetheless in the sequel there's nothing amazing (apart from the special effects) to freak anyone out. Instead, James Cameron sets out to prove that vacuum cleaners too can have complex personalities. Sorry, it just doesn't wash. And neither does the anti-war theme which is so lightly graffiti-ed over the entire film with the subtlety of a skinhead wielding a baseball bat at a gay pride demonstration. The final little speech made at the end of the film is so unashamedly and outrightly didactic that its saccharin taste leaves one with the need to reach for the bucket. (It still makes me want to wretch just writing about it.)

What I love in a good film is coming out of the cinema, forgetting it, but then continually thinking about it over the next few days. What I loathed about Terminator 2 was coming out of the cinema, forgetting about it, and then continually thinking about its inconsistencies for the next few years. Poor though the third film is, at least it attempts to sort out the muddle of illogical time lines left by the second film. It's downright illogical that the mainframe in the future, knowing it had been destroyed would firstly send a model of a Terminator with a surprisingly large batch run, then realize it had failed and so send a new and better number. Why didn't it just send the more advanced prototype first? (If it had lost the war at the hands of John Connor, what else was the thing going to be used for?) If it weren't for the third film, which was desperately needed to explain this mess, the mainframe computer must have known it had lost the battle instantly. After all, it must have found out through its own non-existence. I know I'm pedantic, but I can't really be the only one out there. However, if you are capable of leaving your brain somewhere else, be my guest. Otherwise I must seriously warn you: this film will do serious damage to your IQ and should be given a government health warning. Give it a miss or start talking more kindly to your household appliances.
14 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed