Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Heroes (II) (2006–2010)
9/10
As Good as Advertised
26 September 2006
I just watched this today (recorded it from last night) and quite honestly, I'm pleasantly surprised. I was convinced the hype machine would kill this show, building up expectations so high they could never be met, but Heroes has measured up nicely, hitting on all marks in my book. I'm as a huge a 24 and House fan as is out there, but Heroes may have just taken TV's top billing in one night.

I must admit, shows now-a-days tend to go down hill after the pilot, but NBC's latest offering seems to have set itself up with a concept and tone that could carry on strong, at least for a season. My initial reaction was that we would either see clichéd super hero garb or some awkward NBC drama soaked in hero juice. What we got instead was a surprisingly good pilot that brought enough "hero material" to live up to its name, but not too much as to make us think we were watching an X-men ripoff.

The writing and the interweaving plot and characters is compelling and interesting, nothing dumbed down, but nothing contrived either. The direction fits the concept perfectly, it grabs you as much as it should, without being distracting. The acting is most surprising in that it's actually good. Masi Oka, who plays "Hiro Nakamura", is quite possibly the best of the cast, though he never speaks a word of English (unless you count "Spock"). Overall the cast is nothing big on paper, but they all manage to hit their marks well.

Last but not least, there were some pop culture references and nods to comic book lore that just made me smile. There seems to be a very cool hero/comic book hip feel that makes you trust the writers on this one.

Again, shows have been known to start strong and fall off soon after, but in this case, Heroes has made a strong enough showing that everyone should check this out.
389 out of 596 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Phil of the Future (2004–2006)
The Premier Example of A Show Not To Watch
19 December 2005
Quite simply, Phil of The Future is one of the worst attempts at entertainment ever seen.

The show is utterly juvenile to the point where it may even make a hyperactive eight-year-old gag in disgust.

Any attempt at a story is viciously murdered by inane and stupid premises that would grieve the mind of any sane individual. The acting is absolutely atrocious; the people on this show try too hard to be cute and amusing like porn stars try too hard to be kinky. Like in any Disney show, production value is rock bottom. If at any point someone discovers that irritating sound effects serve only to snap a three-year-old's attention back to the bright colors, someone give me a call.

Fred Savage fails miserably in this endeavor. He doesn't even come close to some of his better work. Sadly enough, his best directing days may have come in the 90s with only sparse works of any merit coming in more recent years.

Finally, the opening theme is bad enough to make me want to get my ears amputated.

Bottom line: For anyone over 13 this show would be mind numbingly annoying and intolerable. For anyone under 13 this show would be a major detriment to intellectual development. Thus, do not watch this show.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed