Reviews

28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Actually a pretty clever short
13 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The Daffy/Speedy cartoons usually run the gamut from mediocre to abysmal, but this one is an outlier. It's not a great cartoon or anything, but it's good.

This short thoroughly deconstructs and mocks the idea of the two being paired together by presenting it as a psychological disorder caused by the ingestion of catnip. Unlike other shorts, Daffy going after Speedy is treated as abnormal. In addition, Daffy is also quite sympathetic (in stark contrast to shorts like "Assault and Peppered," where he's a malicious sociopath).

The cartoon does have its share of weaknesses that keep it from being particularly memorable. The animation is just as bad as the other DePatie-Freleng Looney Tunes. It's also rather light on the slapstick, with only a few instances.

The only real laugh-out-loud gag in this cartoon was the scene where a bulldog sees Daffy acting like a cat, then assumes that he'd been drinking too much and throws a liquor bottle away.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bless the Harts (2019–2021)
3/10
Please watch Duncanville instead, that show is actually good
15 May 2022
Bless the Harts is just a lackluster way for Fox to fill the King of the Hill-shaped hole they left in their schedule a decade beforehand.

Duncanville and The Great North are superior to this show in every way. The jokes are actually funny, the writing makes sense, and the character designs don't look horrible. This is just the poor man's King of the Hill.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Oscars (2022 TV Special)
1/10
Insulting
29 March 2022
As an art form, animation never gets any respect and is always treated as inferior to live-action.

This year's Oscars was a particularly horrid offender. These writers threw in jokes about how animation is stuff that only children enjoy, while parents merely endure it. We've known for years that the Academy has an anti-animation bias, but here, they stooped to a new low. The fact that the people saying these lines played the princesses in the live-action Disney remakes (all of which were bastardizations of the original animated versions) is what really made it insulting.

Phil Lord (co-director of The LEGO Movie) called the Oscars out on its bull, and for good reason.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Daffy Flies North (1980 TV Short)
5/10
Daffy's had worse outings
17 March 2022
"Daffy Flies North" is far from Daffy's best outing, but it's not his worst either. The cartoon is pretty cheaply animated, it overuses Hanna-Barbera sound effects, and the music is unimpressive, but the main problem with it is the slow pacing, which makes the short feel like it's twice as long as it actually is.

It's better than most of his pairings with Speedy, but those cartoons set the bar so low that it doesn't say much. Nothing about it is offensively bad, but it's hardly entertaining either. It's just another one of the mediocre post-Golden Age Looney Tunes shorts. It's just... there.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Looney Tunes Show (2011–2015)
10/10
Easily the most underappreciated Looney Tunes continuation out there
26 February 2022
The Looney Tunes Show may have the seemingly questionable premise of transplanting the cast into a sitcom.... but it was managed wonderfully. The show gets too much unfair flack from people unable to adapt to change, when it is actually the most unique Looney Tunes series.

There have been other Looney Tunes cartoons that change the tone, such as a mediocre preschool cartoon and an absolutely dreadful action cartoon. However, WB finally managed to nail it here.

For all of the changes to the characters, they are still recognizable as themselves and manage to be hilarious as a result. The only character who was changed wholesale was Lola, and that's a blessing because her original incarnation was a Mary Sue with no real personality (yet another reason why Space Jam sucked). Here, she's crazy, hyperactive, and probably the funniest character on the show (and considering how hilarious Daffy is, that says a lot).

The humor is sharp, funny, and on point despite the lack of slapstick. Daffy's stupidity, Lola's craziness, Bugs' sarcasm, etc. Make them all comedic gold mines. Much like The Amazing World of Gumball (which, coincidentally, premiered on the same day), the show has a knack for turning even the most tired of sitcom clichés into something worth watching. Also, the show has romantic elements that don't work to its detriment, unlike the later episodes of Regular Show.

The show isn't flawless, though. The Roadrunner segments, much like the Rudy Larriva-directed shorts, are not faithful to the original Chuck Jones-directed shorts. Also, Daffy's mistreatment of Porky is sometimes pretty hard to watch ("The Float" being a particularly bad example). Furthermore, perfectly good characters like Marvin the Martian and Pete Puma were heavily underused, especially during Season 2.

However, the pros outweigh the cons enough that it still earns a good 10/10. The only Looney Tunes continuation better than it is HBO Max's Looney Tunes Cartoons.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Big Nate (2022–2024)
8/10
I wasn't expecting much, but this is actually good!
21 February 2022
I admit that I didn't have very high hopes for this show after the Diary of a Wimpy Kid animated movie soured me on animated adaptations of books. However, I gave it the benefit of the doubt because I loved both the comic strip and the books.

This show is actually faithful to its source material and definitely far better than anything else Nick's made in the past several years. Everyone is in-character, the jokes are actually pretty clever, and the animation is gorgeous; while the show is CG-animated, it imitates stop-motion very convincingly and in a way that complements the character designs well.

There's also a lot of medium blending involving Nate's drawings, and they all look just as they did in the original comic strip.

I definitely recommend this show, especially if you were already a fan of Big Nate. 8/10.
22 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Museum Scream (2003)
2/10
A very meager effort
18 February 2022
"Museum Scream" is a very poor Looney Tunes cartoon from the early 2000s. It was meant to be released in theaters, but they decided not to and it's pretty easy to see why.

The cartoon does have its redeeming qualities; the animation is actually pretty fluid and the pacing is fast. However, it also has sadistic gags that make it very uncomfortable to watch (even more than "My Generation G-G-Gap" from the same era), and the cherry on top is a poop joke courtesy of Tweety. Almost as bad is the scene where Sylvester is attacked by a scorpion, with all of the sting sites swelling.

The prism gag is creative and had some potential, but the multiple Sylvesters getting blown up by fireworks (with Tweety cracking jokes about the multiple deaths he just witnessed) is cringeworthy.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dicky Moe (1962)
4/10
This foreshadows those Direct-to-Video Tom and Jerry movies
18 February 2022
Dicky Moe, while better than the likes of "Down and Outing" or "High Steaks", is still a pretty poor cartoon overall.

The good thing is that the backgrounds actually look pretty nice.

However, this just feels like one of those direct-to-video Tom and Jerry movie adaptations. The cartoon is best described as Moby Dick, but with dull shenanigans happening in the background.

The gags aren't offensively bad, but they are all extremely predictable and bland. Also, the "black paint" gag is recycled from an earlier cartoon.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bleh
17 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Rudy Larriva is best known for his eleven Roadrunner cartoons during the mid-1960s, and all of them pale in comparison to the Chuck Jones-directed shorts, suffering from unremarkable music and stiff animation.

Clippety Clobbered is the last one he directed, and it really isn't any better than the others.

The first plan involving the invisible rock had potential, but it's ultimately ruined by the fact that the Roadrunner is actively fighting back against Wile E. Coyote, which is completely out-of-character for him.

With the invisible bricks, one has to wonder how the invisible paint wore off so fast on the coyote and the rock, but not the brick wall.

The idea of Wile E. Coyote making a bouncy mixture seems okay, but the scene drags out for WAY too long.

Unless you're a completist or you want to pad out the number of films you've rated on IMDb, I advise just skipping this.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sprite Fright (2021)
10/10
Fantastic
16 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Sprite Fright, despite its cute 3D animation, is not some harmless kid's movie. It is a slasher film with cute little Smurf-esque creatures called sprites, who at first seem to be benevolent and harmless.

But the actuality is that they have a bone to pick with anyone who damages the environment.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Inferno (I) (2016)
4/10
A dud compared to the book
16 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Inferno as directed by Ron Howard isn't terrible, but it isn't very good either. The rule of thumb is that the book is better, and this is no exception.

The primary issue with this film is that it completely throws the book's ending out the window in favor of... more action scenes, more character deaths, and Sienna Brooks being a genuine villain and trying to release the virus instead of trying to stop it like in the book, turning it into another generic action thriller that simply blends in and leaves several loose threads hanging.

The book actually reveals what the virus does: it causes infertility in one-third of the human population by way of altering the DNA. The virus is released a week sooner than Robert Langdon and Sienna Brooks anticipated. Sienna wanted to contain the virus because a DNA-altering virus could be used for far more malicious purposes.

But because the virus is contained in the movie and thus the audience never learns what the virus does, Zobrist effectively comes across as yet another omnicidal "destroy the world" villain. It would have been much wiser to keep the original ending than to give it a full-on facelift.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mediocre but passable
7 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This animated adaptation of the first Diary of a Wimpy Kid book has its moments, but on the whole it's inferior to the first three live-action movies (though, let's not kid ourselves, it's far better than the Long Haul movie).

The direction of the animation is interesting as it converts the book's doodle-like artstyle into CGI, much like the Captain Underpants movie did. The difference, however, is that Captain Underpants' artstyle is far more compatible with 3D than Diary of a Wimpy Kid is. As a result, some of the character designs look a little off.

The story looks like it would stay faithful at first, but this would be difficult to pull off since the movie falls just short of an hour long. As a result, the movie is hastily rushed after the Halloween scene, skipping most of the second half of the book (minus Greg's newspaper comic) and ultimately keeping every single event within autumn.

There are some jokes that land (like the teenagers saying Greg and Rowley will pay), but ultimately it's nowhere near as funny as its live-action equivalent.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pokémon: Brilliant Diamond (2021 Video Game)
7/10
Decent, but no match for Platinum
23 November 2021
Pokémon Brilliant Diamond & Shining Pearl aren't great games, but they are still enjoyable all-in-all. This is a given, considering what a wonderful region Sinnoh was. It's still a little disappointing given the fact that Omega Ruby & Alpha Sapphire before it fixed what was one of the worst games in the franchise and made Hoenn tolerable.

The Quality of Life is much better in these games than in the originals. One example is no longer being forced to lug around a Bibarel as you had to in the originals; HMs are now a part of the Pokétch and are unlocked as soon as you obtain their corresponding TMs.

The graphics are of debatable quality, but the overworld chibis are quite cute and the in-battle trainer models are well-crafted and faithful to their original sprites. In particular, we get to see the Battle Girls and the female Cyclists in all their 3D glory. Oddly though, they screwed up with Mars' model, and she's no longer as attractive.

The Underground also got a major rehaul, and instead of simply mining and decorating bases, there are now special areas where you can encounter wild Pokémon, including those that aren't in the DP Sinnoh dex (Magnemite and Houndoom, both of which had to wait until Platinum to enter the Sinnoh dex, come to mind).

While the Union Room is back, they made it so that you are able to access it anytime (after your initial visit) by pressing the Y button.

However, many of the issues from the original Diamond & Pearl that Platinum addressed have come back in these games, namely the underleveled NPCs, slightly weaker plotline, and the lack of Fire-types in the region (discounting the Grand Underground). Similarly to the previous two entries for the Nintendo Switch, the Exp. Share is mandatory. Just like the (sadly underrated) Sword & Shield, affection is also mandatory, despite Sylveon not being in the game.

Overall, the game warrants a 7/10. Good but not great.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid concept, not as good as most Roadrunner shorts though
1 November 2021
Admittedly, the idea of Speedy Gonzales and the Roadrunner having a foot race is a great idea.

While it's not as bad as most shorts from that era, it's nothing to write home about either. The fact is that is recycles animation (and, by extension, gags) from previous Roadrunner cartoons. This also results in a jarring contrast between Sylvester (who is drawn in the DePatie-Freleng style) and Wile E. Coyote (who is drawn in Chuck Jones' distinctive style).

That being said, it could be pretty enjoyable if you haven't seen "Zoom and Bored" (which the short recycles its animation from) and the ending was decent.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than Chuck Jones's other cartoons of the era
7 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Daffy Duck and the Dinosaur is Jones's first use of Daffy, using the older, screwball version rather than the greedy grouch he developed in the 50s.

Chuck Jones's early cartoons usually suffered from poor timing and a more Disney-like approach, but this one is different. It revolves around a caveman that takes his brontosaurus hunting for Daffy. The comedic timing is a lot better than usual for his 1938-1942 work, probably the best out of that era.

The gags are actually quite funny, and the brontosaurus especially lent itself well to slapstick. The ending gag was also pretty creative, with the inflatable duck... But then Daffy gets so carried away with this that when the duck pops, he went down along with Casper and the brontosaurus.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
On Any Day, I Can't Bear to See This Episode!
13 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The school goes on a field trip to a glacier (which suffered the effects of climate change). While there, Bart decides to pull a few admittedly pretty annoying pranks on Lisa, who gets angry enough to file a restraining order on him.

First of all, you can't file a restraining order against your own family member, especially if you're still a child. Second of all, Lisa uses it as an excuse to torture Bart, which may I add is ILLEGAL and will result in the order getting revoked. Yet absolutely nobody seems to care, and Lisa prods him with a screwdriver (which Homer stupidly put on the end) just to spite him. Hell, he can't even be in the school with her, and Groundskeeper Willie is his new teacher.

Then the order gets extended, to the point that Bart is forced to live outside with the wolves. And then Marge asks Lisa to remember the nice things Bart has done for her. But wait, remember episodes like "Round Springfield" or "Stark Raving Dad"? Oh yeah, apparently those didn't happen.

And then there's the pretty rushed, half-assed ending, where Lisa sees a statue (which Bart was intending to burn; I don't blame him) of her that Bart made and forgives him. And then the family plays music together.

In general, this episode suffers an atrocious A-plot, a forgettable B-plot, massive out-of-character moments, and an overall mean-spirited tone. We were supposed to side with Lisa, but this is her at her absolute lowest.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tin Toy (1988)
8/10
Pixar in its Infancy
13 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This short is a great effort, revolving around a toy that (justifiably) tries to elude a scary baby that plays rough with its toys and gets slobber on some of them. He manages to get under a couch, filled with other toys that ran away.

But when the baby starts to cry, the toy shows sympathy for him; the baby picks him up and the toy pretty quickly realizes that it was a bad idea to let his guard down. He ends up in pursuit of the baby, who took his box.

The animation, while good for its time (with nice shading on the titular tin toy), didn't age so well, especially the baby, who looks much more primitive than the toy; however, both Pixar and CGI in general were pretty new to the animation business in 1988 (this being only their fourth short), so this can be pretty easily forgiven.

The plot is also quite good, proving Chuck Jones's point that even with the volume turned off, a truly good cartoon is perfectly comprehensible.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pill Peddlers (1952)
8/10
Another fine entry in an underrated classic
27 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The Terrytoons have had a very hit-or-miss track record for their entire run. Of all their cartoons, however, Heckle and Jeckle's were the most consistent (along with perhaps Farmer Alfalfa), and this cartoon does not disappoint.

The cartoon opens at a gym where several characters are working out until they hear Heckle and Jeckle advertise their miracle pills. The gym's champ catches wind of this and tells them to get lost; they do it a second time and he drags them in to prove their effectiveness.

This culminates in gags like our two favorite magpies tricking the champ into plummeting several stories, the two disguising themselves as dumbbells, and a surprisingly funny elevator chase (which eventually gets the two to fall so low that they wind up in Hell).

You'd expect these two to be designated heroes that get away with causing havoc, but as the cartoon ends with the standard iris out, the champ drags them back into the cartoon and beats them.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not what I was expecting, but hilarious nonetheless!
27 June 2021
At first glance, you'd think The Rattled Rooster would be a Foghorn Leghorn cartoon, but this stars a completely different, much slower-witted rooster in his fruitless attempts to catch a worm.

The gags this time around are really clever, like you'd expect in an Art Davis cartoon. Especially the scenes with the rattlesnake and the toothpaste gag.

To be honest, it's a shame that this worm didn't make any other appearances, since he had quite a bit of potential.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Sad to say it's not Daffy's best.
14 May 2021
It's far from his worst, but it's still pretty subpar by both Daffy's standards and by Art Davis's standards. It's not unwatchable, though.

The animation is pretty poor, though that can be excused because of lower budgets in 1962 compared to the studio's heyday. Oddly though, Daffy lacks the white ring around his neck here. Of course, animation quality isn't indicative of overall quality.

Speaking of overall quality, the cartoon has its moments but isn't as funny as Daffy's other cartoons of this year (or Art Davis's other Daffy cartoons; "The Stupor Salesman" is much funnier).

The general plot also reminds me of "The Up-Standing Sitter" (where Daffy has to retrieve a baby chick who hatches and runs away from him while egg-sitting and has to contend with an angry bulldog instead of a crocodile) and "An Egg Scramble" (where an elderly hen runs across town trying to get "her" egg back and Porky tries to stop her). In my personal opinion, both of those cartoons are better.

I also found Daffy's wife to be a pretty aggravating character.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Early to Bet (1951)
8/10
Great, overhated cartoon
19 April 2021
"Early to Bet" is a hilarious cartoon about a gambling bug that bites a cat, which gives him a compulsive need to play cards with a soft-spoken bulldog. The dog is surprisingly funny here, as are the penalties the cat is subject to after losing every game.

It is beyond me why it's getting so many negative reviews here. This cartoon isn't teaching any morals; people seem to be taking cues from Mr. Enter and snuffing out morals in shows that don't have them.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not the best, but the music keeps it entertaining
17 April 2021
"Nursery Scandal" is a mostly nondescript cartoon fairly typical of that era of animation. There isn't much of a plot to speak of.

But that doesn't make the cartoon bad. In fact, this cartoon has a very impressive soundtrack, which keeps it engaging and is basically the main selling point here.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Simpsons: Co-Dependent's Day (2004)
Season 15, Episode 15
1/10
The show jumps the shark again
7 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The episode had potential. Homer and Marge getting drunk actually had potential if done right.

But said potential is dashed to bits after Homer drunkenly drives, flips the car upside down and frames Marge for it. Homer is supposed to be innocently insensitive to Marge. But here. he knows full well what he's doing (albeit drunk) and lies about it.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Review for House Fancy (I have no memory of Krabby Road)
7 December 2020
First off, let's get the elephant out of the room: THE TOENAIL SCENE DID NOT AFFECT THE EPISODE'S QUALITY IN ANY WAY. It was a scene that lasted ten seconds at most and had no importance to the plot. I personally found it pretty funny, all things considered.

But House Fancy is actually a pretty solid episode. I mean, Squidward actually managed to score a victory, which is rare for Seasons 6-8 of SpongeBob. Despite everything he went through, it was all made worthwhile.

And there were plenty of funny jokes like the golden toilet (hats off to the writers for making toilet humor actually work).
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Embarrassing at best
5 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This was the final cartoon to use any of the classic Warner Bros. characters; after this, new characters and one-shot cartoons were their entire output.

First off, the animation and music are very poor. There are two scenes with Daffy looking out a window, and the exact same animation is used even though he was in a different room each time (first the lab, then Daffy's bedroom). There's also the score, which is generic at best. The cartoon itself looks like something out of Hanna-Barbera (complete with an overuse of their sound effects).

That's nothing to say about the writing. Daffy gets angry at Speedy for his "corny music"? Is that the best the writers could come up with? On another note, they at least tried to make Daffy less of a jerk in previous cartoons after getting horribly flanderized through much of the 60s (the Daffy/Speedy cartoon before it actually had them as friends).

Then the two get sent back in time, where they are fed to a lion. This culminates into a series of rather bland gags with awful timing (just one example is the scene with the lion eating Speedy's wooden sword).

Then they break Nero's fiddle, get chased by him and then get sent back to the present. Also, Nero got brought along with them. Why didn't the scientist just send him back to Ancient Rome? And why did he have to join Speedy's band?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed