Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Road House (2024)
4/10
Nortoriously Awful Acting
4 April 2024
It says a lot about a movie when the main star has more presence off screen than than another big character has when they are on.

It doesn't happen often, but here - and this may be the single greatest example in the history of film-making - absolutely everyone who has a speaking part is significantly more charismatic and believable in their roles even when they are off screen than McGregor is when he is on it.

There's no doubt McGregor is a tough nut in real life, but on screen as a thug he's utterly laughable, a high pitched squeal spaffed up to a bulging steroidal uber-swagger of shiny porcelain toothed rage. Imagine Darth Vader with the voice of Daffy Duck and you would find yourself nearing the outer periphery of just how bad McGregor is in this role.

Thankfully, it's still almost possible to enjoy the whole-hearted B-movieness of Road House. Gyllenhall doesn't have to do much because he can play the beat-em-up feckless charmer with his eyes closed, always watchable. Billy Magnussen is a hoot; I'm guessing that when he saw what McGregor was bringing, he decided to ramp the ham all the way up to 11 knowing it would seem restrained in comparison.

Everyone else does the necessary and gets out of it with their bits intact, which is a credit to Liman.

In the 70s this would have been passable summer fare silliness at the cinema, which probably explains why it's available direct to Prime in April.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
YA Science & Catwalk Casting
25 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I was looking forward to this, something that promised to be an interesting take on hard-science what iffery. Not having read the books, I don't have any axe to grind with how good or not the adaption is - I just want to be entertained with compelling characters, interesting ideas, and just maybe a Netflix show that delivers on its promise.

What we have here is a failure to communicate anything of substance. Catwalk pretty scientists allude to wikisearch results with all the depth of a Mr Men episode - simply referencing the existence of hard science does not make it that kind of show. Good looking young people ramp their expositional acting all the way up to 3 by way of first-take it'll-do directing. It really does not help with the dialogue has everyone talk with the same voice; there is no nuance between any of the characters, except Liam Cunningham who drops the C bomb every so often because he's Irish and that worked well for him in GoT.

Anyway: somewhere out there, there are God like beings far more advanced than we can imagine. They are coming. They may get here sooner than Jesus, they may not. Hopefully both arrive at the same time and there's a proper religion V science kick-off. Neither can come soon enough if this show is any barometer of the smarts humanity allegedly possesses.

Rich people want to be best positioned to take advantage, and will do whatever it takes to make that happen while creating more plot-holes per minute than any other show in living memory.

The special effects are Dr Whovian, circa 2005.

That's pretty much it.

Enjoy.
32 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Old School Rom Com with Added F-bombs
11 February 2024
There's nothing remotely original about 'Anyone But You', which is as it should be. It's a proper throwback to 80s and 90s rom-coms, where cute-meet hits an impossible obstacle only to overcome it so everyone can hit their happy ever after mark around the 90 minute deadline.

Me & her grew up and dated watching rom-coms like this way back when, and it's good to see something like this back on the big screen. There are no surprises, because there's not supposed to be.

The story is as dumb as a box of rocks: tick The leads are charming and good-looking: tick There's a gentle knowing humour to the whole thing: tick Everyone looks like they're enjoying themselves: tick There's a few 'that's whatisname' cameos: tick

Add in some sunshine, luxury property-porn settings and you've got all the ingredients necessary. Whether it works for you pretty much depends on what you expect from a rom-com - and if you've seen the trailer you can't possibly have any doubts that this isn't exactly what it's advertised as: pure candy floss designed to be sweet for a moment and then dissolve before you leave the cinema.

Anyone expecting more ... pfft. I dunno what you could possible have expected from the trailer that wasn't in it; some people seem to wake up needing to be offended by something utterly innocuous these days. If that sounds like you, go see this movie.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2024– )
8/10
Straight Talking Hitsters
4 February 2024
Finished this 8 episode series in two sittings, which is a rarity for us; most episodes clock in around the 40 minute mark, so they're not tediously padded out.

Anyone expecting this to be a crash bang wallop adventuring romcom, like the original film, will likely be somewhat disappointed by this. This version of M&M Smith is heavy on the dialogue and exploring the relationship between Jane & John Smith as the assume their roles as married assassins. Initial curiosity about how they'll make things work, who does what domestically, and how far to take the marriage aspect of things eventually progresses towards a more evolved relationship and all that entails.

They're charming. How can they not be when Glover and Erskine play the relationship side of things with such ease. While their first mission seems simple enough, it quickly lets them know they're in a high risk profession. With a new mission each episode, it's not hard to binge a few episodes at a time; the missions seem to escalate in difficulty just as the arc of their relationship develops, their lives becoming more challenging as things progress.

Both of them are good company: he's chilled and not as sure of himself as he lets on, while she's dead-pan and more sociopath with a heart of gold leaf. The missions are varied if relatively straight-forward, with some nicely gauged cameos. Thankfully any shoot-outs are kept to a minimum - when they're extended they tend to resort to the good guys being tediously dull one shot wonders (when the plot needs them to be) while the bad guys are disposable and inept (when the plot needs them to be) ... can this be not a thing anymore, please, it's lazy and any semblence of something being mildly thrilling is reduced to the ho-humness of inevitablility. A fing awful trope.

Erskine and Glover carry the weight of the show lightly, the ups and downs of the relationship and it meets personal and professional obstacles is neatly judged. The locations make it stand out from those generic mission based shows that always seem to use a few stock establishing shots before resorting to generic studio interiors.

Mr & Mrs Smith are jolly good company. Looking forward to seeing what kind of approach the writers might take going forward given the final scenes.
23 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Griselda (2024)
1/10
Just Say No
1 February 2024
I was really looking forward to this, hoping it would be on a par with Narcos in terms of gritty stories exploring how someone so violent comes to power.

Unfortunately, due to the tepid direction and bland depictions of complex characters everything kind of trudges along without any originality. It's one of those shows that looks exactly like someone showed the director some photos from 1980s music videos and discotheques and they just saw the vibrant colors, but never got the memo about how seedy and dark it all actually was. The look of Griselda is superficial, utterly fake, and completely falls flat in terms of energy and impact.

That said, the only thing more fake and flat is Sofia Vergara's appalling make up. I'm not sure what they were after, but if hiding her natural charisma behind a wall of matte prosthetic rubber-faced weirdness resembling nothing more than a botched botox job followed by a drunken make-over was the aim then they nailed it. There's simply far too much, applied far to awkwardly to be in any way realistic, and all that remains is the distraction of WTF have they done.

I'm not saying that the make-up alone is what keep from from being pulled into the story, but it certainly didn't help. Stuff happened, but I just couldn't enough to follow through.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fargo (2014–2024)
10/10
S5: Second Best Fargo
28 January 2024
1. Fargo (movie) 2. Fargo S2 3. Fargo S5 4. Fargo S1 5. Fargo S3 6. Fargo S4

Season 5 is a welcome return to form after Seasons 3 & 4, both of them decent, with fab production values as usual, but just didn't have the Fargo vibe.

Juno Temple is terrific, and the episode with the long scene of her in the back of a car with all her emotions playing out across her face is awesome.

Jon Hamm is better than I've seen him in anything recently. He does cruel very well. Jennifer Jason Leigh is fabulous, more of her, in anything please.

Joe Keery leaves his Stranger Things persona at the door and is so good at being the required Fargo inept try-hard idiot.

Can't wait for the next season.
9 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sexy Beast (2024– )
1/10
Pure Tosh
27 January 2024
'eavans above. An absolute twavesty is what it is. Laiwy geezers giving it all that wiv their posh-boy wannabe wide-boy jibber jabber. Tamsin tryin being 'ard as nails wiv her Pat Butcher hair and Sid James cigarette. It's all gone very Pete Tong.

Ray Winstone would eat this lot wiv his corn-flakes, and Ben Kingsley would (*) 'em out before lunch.

It's got all those ingredients from the original, a 20+ year old cult classic, being given to people who've heard of the original but not seen it. Then imagine the Great British Bake Off, but for TV production, with Guy Ritchie and Vinnie Jones as the judges.

Tasty.

Unlike this dog's upchucked dinner.
38 out of 86 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Poor Things (2023)
9/10
Darkly Comic Frankenbarbie
14 January 2024
Differing from Alasdair Gray's 1990s novel of the same name in that the book told Bella's fantastical story from her husband's point of view, and also a rebuttal of it from Bella's.

The film chronicles Bella's life as a resurrected young woman who must learn how to be - from walking to talking to building relationships, all at an accelerated rate of discovery.

It's a film that's bound to be divisive, not just because the scope of Yorgos Lanthimos' particularly peculiar eye is darkly comic tonally, but his eye for visuals and ear for how dialogue is delivered is invariably 'off' in ways that can be discordant. At the end of our viewing we heard a young couple in the cinema argue about it: him - I'm not ever going to see a film with you again without watching the trailer first!

As if that would help! Yorgos Lanthimos' films are all on brand, so it's not very likely that anyone who doesn't like one will find the others any more accessible. He doesn't do the easy thing.

Neither does Emma Stone. After playing disappointingly vacuous in The Curse, here she puts herself wholly into an unabashed portrayal of a fully grown newborn woman embarking on a voyage (in every sense) of self-discovery. Bella is wonderful and engaging and absolutely delightful, an uplifting force that rises far above what all the grounded and desolate men about her would rather her be.

The fools.
47 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Curse (2023– )
2/10
Try Hard Banality
8 January 2024
Up until The Curse I had thought I could watch Emma Stone in anything, apparently not.

After two and a half episodes I gave up. Whitney (Stone) and Asher (Fielder) have zero chemistry, zero likeability, and zero self-awareness. I get that the humour is about that lack of self-awareness, but here it's played with such earnestness that there's no room for anything else. There's no sense that these are real people with real lives outside of being script perfect performative: they are earnest; always on note; all of the time. They are entitled and exhaustingly uninteresting try-hards, which the other avatars of everyday mediocrity acknowledge and somehow put up with for their own meritless advantage. Dougie (Safdie), hamming it up to a minimum of 11, outright despises Asher but is happy to use him as a patsy plaything while trying to manipulate Whitney.

Unfortunately, as a viewer, there's nothing to gain from being in their company. They are all petty and small-minded, all skin-deep shallow, pretentious blank facades masking humour-adjacent witless voids.

Ugh.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reacher (2022– )
2/10
Season 2 Falls Off A Cliff
5 January 2024
Really enjoyed season one, (8/10) properly old school loner-on-a-mission to fix the world one bad guy at a time. Nice wry sense of humour and good back up from secondary characters that were interesting and well-rounded.

Second season? Dear God, what the absolute effity. Fights are woeful, worse than last season A-Team grab the pay-cheque awful. Bad guys are laughably incompetent. Secure facilities can be ram-raided without hinderence, consequence or, as best i can tell, even a scratch to the paintwork. If the best they can come up with for a catchphrase is 'Just Reacher' they're not even trying. Throw in a ham-fisted will they won't they love interest that no one gives a heck about and meh.

Life's too short to abide tosh like this.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Maestro (2023)
6/10
Pretty, But Utterly Shallow
1 January 2024
A series of Kodak moments played out to look as good as possible while saying nothing of consequence. Not so much a movie as a series of postures and poses designed to work with light and composition, as if the whole point was to create a book of still images that provide a glossy and shallow overview of a notable life.

There's no sense of what compels Bernstein to do anything, he merely floats effortlessly between moments being rather too pleased with himself. The dialogue wants to be snappy in that heightened overlapping way of golden era Hollywood black and white movies, but it's far to vacuous and slight to be more than hot air puffery.

I couldn't care less about the fuss over Cooper's prosthetic nose, people are so eager to find offence in anything these days that it won't be long before actors are only allowed to play themselves. I'm more offended that this portrayal of Bernstein is so one note and blandly inoffensive. Mulligan can usually lift any movie she's in, but here she is far too simpering for far too long to create any heft to this biographical fluff.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed