Review of Chelsea Girls

Chelsea Girls (1966)
2/10
It's a intolerable to watch! It's experimental avant garde!--It's both!
4 November 2001
You know when you let your mind drift--especially when under the influence of drugs or alcohol--and you think up some idea that sounds like it would be great? A typical non-genius would consider an idea like that later and think, "well, this sounded like a good idea then but it's just stupid now?" Thankfully, Warhol said to himself, "no, I'm a genius and therefore that was a good idea."

And what was this brilliant idea?

Film a bunch of drug users and couples in various rooms of a hotel then project two films at a time side-by-side, shifting the audio to switch focus.

Doesn't that sound amazingly fresh and cool?

Don't answer yet! You also get:

  • randomly twitchy camera work


  • quasi-purposeful film speed changes


  • having the camera's point-of-interest fail to follow the viewer's desires


  • racking the zoom


  • sluggish response to bad focus after changing camera positions


  • over- and under-exposure


Now how much would you pay?

With your average film you'd get three or four reels, but with this, you get _12 reels!_ Plus, you get sketchy instructions on when to do transitions and change projectors, putting _you in the driver seat!_

Operators are standing by.
49 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed