1/10
Camp drivel designed to exploit windowlickers
27 April 2004
This movie is, to begin with, deeply offensive. Taking a subject many folk believe in then building a cynical, impossible lie of a story on it, based (not as some would have you believe, Revelations) on a cheap, National Enquirer style sensationalist bit of airport reading trash like the Bible Code (BTW you know they've done 'The Da Vinci code' now too) is offensive not just to anyone who cares about how a premise for a film gets the green light but more disturbingly to anyone who is a mug for this sort of thing.

Now I'm from England so my knowledge of US Christianity is limited but most positive respondents to this pile of pants appear to take it as much as gospel truth as er... the Gospels. That is worrying because in many cases they overlook the eye-popping absurdity of the film. And they should be aware...

Now I missed some of the movie because i took the precaution to be good and drunk while watching this and I fell asleep in some of the slower bits. however, I loved the bits I did see. Highlights and there are no SPOILERS, it can't be done:

Caspar and york's initial conversation was the campiest piffle I've ever seen, I've seen more macho dialogue in Maurice. I have no idea how they kept straight faces.

The dodgy angel guys chasing down the Jewish guy was the least thrilling chase down in any movie. The chuckle brothers are more tense.

The explosion was hopelessly weedy. It was.... I can't be bothered. This film was pathetically horrible. The only reason to watch it is to drink heavily with and chuck junk at the telly. Funny stuff and utter bollox
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed