7/10
Better than the first. Still flawed, though.
2 October 2001
Forrest Cochran is an excellent actor, and portrayed the character of Luc with professionalism and depth. Much more intense than the Character of Devon played by Bradley Stryker in the first movie. His look is mysterious, handsome and has a hidden evil streak behind it. Excellent performance. I would love to see him in a big-budget movie. I believe he could pull it off.

Sean Faris, (John) is obnoxiously good-looking (similar to Nathan Watkins as Chris in the first one). He still isn't that bad an actor, but could use a little work. He could be in bigger pictures.

The rest of the Cast is...there! The Characer of Harlan is played in a bland way, and the actor looks more like a PlayGirl Centerfold than an actor. His two cronies are horrible actors, and should pursue a different career path.

The Character of Mary is okay, but there is no depth to here. Seeing as director David Decoteau only makes these movies to put chiseled, defined guys in their underwear is the main focus. Not enough time and effort is put into the plot. However, This installment into the Brotherhood series proves more, dare I say, intelligent than the first. It has a little more depth, but dies at the end like the first did.

Overall, this one was much better than the first. Give more back story to the character of Luc, and acted much better than the first. Okay, so you can make an erotic horror movie...But what is so erotic about guys in their underwear. They is the thing that fetish's are made of. Not eroticism. Maybe just homoeroticism!

7 out of 10
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed