Review of The Dam Busters

8/10
Careful blending of truths.
24 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
For a period piece it is a pretty good movie though there are many and varied prints out there, some made for the American market have gratuitous shots of B-24's exploding cut into it to make the movie "more exciting" and in more modern releases there has been some editing to remove some code names and the name of Guy Gibson's dog which back then was called "N****r" in reference to his black coat - rather than a derogatory mention of a particular colour of human.

So if you can obtain an original British print of this movie (you can get it from Amazon in the UK - though it is a UK region DVD with PAL output) then you will see the unedited version.

The film deals with the RAF's May 1943 - "Operation Chastise" - an early attempt at what is now known as "precision bombing" using special munitions - in this case a bomb code-named "Upkeep" but known to all UK citizen's as "the bouncing bomb" - because that is what the bomb did. In order to defeat torpedo netting in front of the dams and in order to place the bomb in close contact with the dam face in order to disrupt it and blow a hole in it - planes had to fly at a precise course, speed and height over water in order to drop their bomb and knock out the hydro-electric dams that provided power to the German industry in the Ruhr valley.

The film is historically important because it records an event that gave the UK a HUGE morale boost when the country was tiring of a series of defeats and at the time the raid took place Churchill was visiting Roosevelt who was having serious concerns about the effectiveness of the UK's forces in the fight against Germany. The raid took place while Churchill was meeting with Roosevelt and gave Churchill some political capital during the visit. A single squadron of bombers in one night had achieved more than the US Army's 8th Air force had achieved in a year of bombing. (and to be fair - the RAF had not been doing much better up to that point).

The movie is in two parts - inventor Barnes Wallis's fight with officialdom to get his idea recognised and the training and actual operation.

The first part is a condensation of a very complex political process and historically suffers from the compression of the facts. Wallis was not the lone voice in the wilderness portrayed in the movie but the analogy serves well with the British movie-going public who in 1954 could remember when the UK stood alone against Germany. This part of the movie is helped by actual wartime footage of the bomb design and testing - though the edited large black "blob" hanging under the real test aircraft was to disguise details of the workings of the bomb which - even in 1954 - were still secret.

The training for the operation and the actual raid sequence uses Lancaster bombers on loan from the RAF and gives a sobering impression of just how hard it was to safely fly a 12,000 lb; 4 engined heavy bomber just 60 feet over water in order to deploy the weapon correctly. The actual raid follows the events as known in 1954 when the film was made. Subsequent research has corrected some of the finer details but the sense of the story is correct. Special effects - by modern standards - are pretty weak but the mixing of real wartime footage plus a stroke of luck for the producers when the Dutch dykes (dams to keep out seawater - like New Orleans' levees) failed in 1953 and Holland was flooded - produced real footage of a flooded countryside.

Careful before and after sequences of crew's rooms, mess halls and the airfield portray the huge casualties suffered by the air crews pressing home this particular raid.

Naive political incorrectness aside (which is over debated in many on-line forums - it is a reasonably historically accurate film for goodness sake!) this movie gives a fair account of the operation and tells the tale from the point of view of the human cost. Worth a watch.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed