Review of Lies Inc.

Lies Inc. (2004)
2/10
A bunch of amateurs on a low budget?
15 May 2006
In short, the only good thing about this movie was the semi-decent storyline. And that wasn't good enough to save the movie, as the realization just sucked monkeydoodles.

Why you shouldn't see this movie: 1. The cast OMFGLOL, where did they get these guys? Overacting, acting out-of-role, being altogether boring and untalented... Taking a couple of acting classes wouldn't do harm.

2. The stage/scene/setting design Having computers made in 1990 as "high-tech equipment" is not cool. The lighting was bad. Everything was bad. In retrospect, I wonder if they even had a qualified scene/set designer at all?

3. Direction & camera work Uninspiring, unoriginal and made me feel like I was watching a production that was made for class by a first year student in college.

4. Visual effects First of all, we need to have a short dictionary, "Advertizing" - "Real world languages": "Awesome effects!" translates to... "Awful effects." "Shocking effects!" translates to... "Shocking, in a bad way." "An ingenious scifi thriller!" translates to... "God kills a kitten every time someone lies to make a bad movie sound good... And there are a lot of dead kittens." The effects were just bad. Ugly. Low-quality. A pack of chimpanzees with sticks, stones and a computer would do better. 'Nuff said.

Why you should see this movie? 1. The storyline Well, it's okay... If a more talented team would have done better justice to it.
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed