I don't see what all the hoopla is about. The dialog is, of course, fictionalized, but the key events are all presented as they have been documented numerous other places. The missed opportunities, the insistence on treating terrorism as a "legal" problem, the overriding concern about political fallout- its all been available for anyone willing to read for years now.
It is somewhat appalling to me that anyone (now its the liberal side's turn to look silly) would be so blinded by the theology of their particular political bent that they cannot admit that a series of mistakes WAS made dating back to at least 1990. And would protest a docu-drama for exploring that fact.
It is somewhat appalling to me that anyone (now its the liberal side's turn to look silly) would be so blinded by the theology of their particular political bent that they cannot admit that a series of mistakes WAS made dating back to at least 1990. And would protest a docu-drama for exploring that fact.