1/10
This movie proves, once again, that plot is more important then action
24 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, to start off, Pirates 3 was a movie with great special effects, decent acting and kind of interesting dialogue. It was also a Disney film, which means that every single character needs to be either funny, heroic or completely idiotic. Or all three.

First things first. The plot. Who understood the bloody story?? I could not once understand why which character was fighting which character and why all the characters weren't dead (because most of them have died, like 5 times in the series). And why did they let Will Turner live? when he was stabbed, I thought to myself, finally, we are finally lost from that friggin Orlando Bloom, but noooo. He put his heart in a treasure box and he lived. Yes, ladies and gentleman, his heart. in. a. treasurebox. But enough about that. If you never care about a plot (or a plot that is kind of consistent, for that matter), this movie will be great for you.

Because the overblown, laugh-inducingly stupidly over the top special effects will have you raise your eye-brow for the entire movie long. The sad thing is, the movie lacks pace, which is kind of essential, for 'adrenaline-pumping action'.

The Pirates of the caribbean: at world's end, was a movie that was overlong, inconsistent, confusing and with a genuine lack of spice in the thing. It sucked about as much as Shrek 3, Spiderman 3, 300 (basically everything with a 3 in it seems to suck this summer), because the story sucked.

I just hope that there will come a movie this summer that will be properly made, interesting, with a good story, dialogue, plenty of self-revelation, a little bit of bite and a little lack of Orlando Bloom or Keira Knightley, who can't act.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed