For some strange reason some people have commented on this site, slating the film as if it were some kind of box office flop that was funded with millions and starred long-term professional actors like De Niro or something.
It's really not that hard to comprehend the difference between an amateur film by first time movie makers with no budget, and a film that was made in Hollywood with a few hundred million behind it.
For what these guys had, they did pretty damned good! I'd like to see anyone else (especially the people with the negative comments) pick up a couple of cameras, get some mates together, and with no money make a film like this.
Why can't people distinguish between film types, No it's not the Matrix or Gladiator, or any other film like it, it's a completely different animal and should be viewed, and rated as such.
People really are dumb!
It's really not that hard to comprehend the difference between an amateur film by first time movie makers with no budget, and a film that was made in Hollywood with a few hundred million behind it.
For what these guys had, they did pretty damned good! I'd like to see anyone else (especially the people with the negative comments) pick up a couple of cameras, get some mates together, and with no money make a film like this.
Why can't people distinguish between film types, No it's not the Matrix or Gladiator, or any other film like it, it's a completely different animal and should be viewed, and rated as such.
People really are dumb!