OK I'm a fan of action films but this was so bad i walked out of the movie. Something i have never done before in 25 years of going to the cinema.
It was mildly entertaining in parts, there was some style to it and it was good to see amber heard in hot pants...... It also made me all warm inside to see cage get shot in the face as he's done such a bad job on this film. thats the good over with.
Normally when i watch a film my imagination sweeps me along with the story even if there are silly plot holes and bad acting etc but it has to be said my imagination was severely tested watching this rubbish. It was so unrealistic in the way it was filmed, the way the characters interacted with each other, the way the characters reacted to things that i just couldn't sit through the whole film.
Amber heard a very attractive skinny girl was able to beat up several stronger guys by punching, elbowing etc I think she would have snapped in 2 if she tripped over the curb let alone got into a fight! She is stunning but totally out of place in this movie.
I guess i would have stayed and watched this to the end and been mildly entertained (and bored at the same time) if it hadn't been 3D and 3D prices. I paid £9.40 + £1 for glasses thats £10.40 to watch a movie!!! This is the 4th so called "3D" movie I have seen at the cinema. I have come to the conclusion that "3D" only works when they add graphics or animation to the screen in some way. During a normal scene without glasses the background is fuzzy and the main characters stick out, with glasses the background clears up a little and the characters or other "3D" objects supposedly stand out from the screen a little. For me this is so hard to notice i really don't know why they bother??? I think this "3D" nonsense is just a big con to get us to pay more to see a film. Why is no one saying anything??? All this press attention telling us about this amazing revolution in the world of cinema. It's just a big con. Avatar was good because of the graphics and animation, from what I've seen they cannot create proper "3D" images of movies and people. thats why the whole "3D" thing was canned back in the 80's...... because it just doesn't work!!! I think we are all crazy spending our money on this sh*t just because the TV adverts tell us to. Are we really a nation of sheep??
It was mildly entertaining in parts, there was some style to it and it was good to see amber heard in hot pants...... It also made me all warm inside to see cage get shot in the face as he's done such a bad job on this film. thats the good over with.
Normally when i watch a film my imagination sweeps me along with the story even if there are silly plot holes and bad acting etc but it has to be said my imagination was severely tested watching this rubbish. It was so unrealistic in the way it was filmed, the way the characters interacted with each other, the way the characters reacted to things that i just couldn't sit through the whole film.
Amber heard a very attractive skinny girl was able to beat up several stronger guys by punching, elbowing etc I think she would have snapped in 2 if she tripped over the curb let alone got into a fight! She is stunning but totally out of place in this movie.
I guess i would have stayed and watched this to the end and been mildly entertained (and bored at the same time) if it hadn't been 3D and 3D prices. I paid £9.40 + £1 for glasses thats £10.40 to watch a movie!!! This is the 4th so called "3D" movie I have seen at the cinema. I have come to the conclusion that "3D" only works when they add graphics or animation to the screen in some way. During a normal scene without glasses the background is fuzzy and the main characters stick out, with glasses the background clears up a little and the characters or other "3D" objects supposedly stand out from the screen a little. For me this is so hard to notice i really don't know why they bother??? I think this "3D" nonsense is just a big con to get us to pay more to see a film. Why is no one saying anything??? All this press attention telling us about this amazing revolution in the world of cinema. It's just a big con. Avatar was good because of the graphics and animation, from what I've seen they cannot create proper "3D" images of movies and people. thats why the whole "3D" thing was canned back in the 80's...... because it just doesn't work!!! I think we are all crazy spending our money on this sh*t just because the TV adverts tell us to. Are we really a nation of sheep??