TEENMAAR review Opening statement: breezy love stories that declares generational differences The case: the love stories of Micheal and arjun. The fate: when two characters are involved, there must be ample scope for editing and narration
Evidence: The movie being similar to many old movies, has same old formula of love stories never stay forever. But in this case, it is clear and teenmaar has two love stories. On one side Micheal who has lot of girl friends and starts loving meera , but after 1 year they split up. Micheal listens to the story of arjun and how he had his chance for love. The two generations are different and trends are different , but yet love stays the same. Micheal realizes his mistakes and goes for meera. What happened to meera? Is she waiting for Micheal or settled herself is the story!! Coming to the point, the movie story is good. But the narration is perfect. Screenplay is good connecting both stories at a time. The movie has many evidences , to make it a very good film. Firstly is the screenplay, one can get perfect screenplay here. No where you find instances where the movie goes on the slow side. Once such cases occur, director immediately shifts the story towards next character. The last 30 minutes of the movie is real asset. Nice emotional filled dialogs , in the marriage scene will give the grip to the movie. Secondly is the music and the best 3 songs are perfectly picturized. Every song has a character and life in it. Thirdly , is the acting skills of pawan kalyan especially as arjun palwai. Trisha as meera , especially in second half last 20 minutes. She definitely showed her skills. Fourthly is the camera work especially the locales of Varanasi.
Judgement revealed: the movie stands different among others. Nice entertainer with hints of emotional content and pleasing climax.
Comments: some illogical stunts in the climax and over acting of Micheal in the first half. Average direction to some extent in first half.
Final statement: teenmaar is a generational love story that will appeal the youth and current audience. The old may not be satisfied with the content and children are too innocent to understand this concept.
Verdict: not guilty
Evidence: The movie being similar to many old movies, has same old formula of love stories never stay forever. But in this case, it is clear and teenmaar has two love stories. On one side Micheal who has lot of girl friends and starts loving meera , but after 1 year they split up. Micheal listens to the story of arjun and how he had his chance for love. The two generations are different and trends are different , but yet love stays the same. Micheal realizes his mistakes and goes for meera. What happened to meera? Is she waiting for Micheal or settled herself is the story!! Coming to the point, the movie story is good. But the narration is perfect. Screenplay is good connecting both stories at a time. The movie has many evidences , to make it a very good film. Firstly is the screenplay, one can get perfect screenplay here. No where you find instances where the movie goes on the slow side. Once such cases occur, director immediately shifts the story towards next character. The last 30 minutes of the movie is real asset. Nice emotional filled dialogs , in the marriage scene will give the grip to the movie. Secondly is the music and the best 3 songs are perfectly picturized. Every song has a character and life in it. Thirdly , is the acting skills of pawan kalyan especially as arjun palwai. Trisha as meera , especially in second half last 20 minutes. She definitely showed her skills. Fourthly is the camera work especially the locales of Varanasi.
Judgement revealed: the movie stands different among others. Nice entertainer with hints of emotional content and pleasing climax.
Comments: some illogical stunts in the climax and over acting of Micheal in the first half. Average direction to some extent in first half.
Final statement: teenmaar is a generational love story that will appeal the youth and current audience. The old may not be satisfied with the content and children are too innocent to understand this concept.
Verdict: not guilty