I'm pleasantly shocked that all the reviews on here are so positive, yet I'm not surprised that IMDb presents the film a 5.5 rating even though if you look at the actual votes this film has received on the IMDb page you will see that it has a Arithmetic mean = 8.6. Median = 10. This means that IMDb has joined the corporate oppression of zoophiles and this film. Wikipedia did the same thing with this film. Amazon removed it from their video on demand. Youtube keeps removing the trailers. And the film doesn't even have porn?! It only features flawless philosophy.
The reason this makes me mad is because I would have found this film - one of all-tome favorites - a lot sooner had it not been subjected to this type of censorship and abuse. Obviously, no corporate sponsor would ever back this film so Sir Tijn Po and CS have been regulated to the underground. They must have known what they're getting into, so no pity for them. But what about us viewers craving this type of powerful philosophical cinema - why should we have to work so hard to find it? But all in all I commend IMDb for at least featuring this film (I found it though you guys) and thanks to the ballsy people behind it who blew my mind, stirred my soul, jerked my tears and have inspired me to live my life more true to my true self.
The reason this makes me mad is because I would have found this film - one of all-tome favorites - a lot sooner had it not been subjected to this type of censorship and abuse. Obviously, no corporate sponsor would ever back this film so Sir Tijn Po and CS have been regulated to the underground. They must have known what they're getting into, so no pity for them. But what about us viewers craving this type of powerful philosophical cinema - why should we have to work so hard to find it? But all in all I commend IMDb for at least featuring this film (I found it though you guys) and thanks to the ballsy people behind it who blew my mind, stirred my soul, jerked my tears and have inspired me to live my life more true to my true self.