Okay, so I stumbled upon two old TV spots for this film on YouTube and was curious about it and wanted to see it.
I went to eBay and then found a VHS copy of it being auctioned at a really low price, so out of curiosity, I placed a bid on the film, not really being bothered if I didn't win.
Turns out, I did win the auction and the film came today and I've just watched it.
Where do I begin?
It's very uneven and seems like the script was written by someone who works for a gossip column, scandal sheet or a tabloid.
There are just so many errors in it, from the casting of the actors (blue-eyed Denny Dillon as dark-eyed Roseanne?!?!) who for the large part look NOTHING like those who they are portraying.
There are many 'wtf' moments here, with the bizarre flashing forward-flashing back of scenes throughout and at times it seems like you're watching something which has no point.
Gossip, badly-written dialogue, errors all over the place.
You'd wonder why they even bothered with this, and what the actors thought of the actual production?
An unauthorised biography it may definitely be, but more to the point, it's hardly even worthy of having the word 'biography' in the title at all since there's so many inaccuracies throughout the film and the jumbled, jump-cut editing of scenes does nothing to help this.
I went to eBay and then found a VHS copy of it being auctioned at a really low price, so out of curiosity, I placed a bid on the film, not really being bothered if I didn't win.
Turns out, I did win the auction and the film came today and I've just watched it.
Where do I begin?
It's very uneven and seems like the script was written by someone who works for a gossip column, scandal sheet or a tabloid.
There are just so many errors in it, from the casting of the actors (blue-eyed Denny Dillon as dark-eyed Roseanne?!?!) who for the large part look NOTHING like those who they are portraying.
There are many 'wtf' moments here, with the bizarre flashing forward-flashing back of scenes throughout and at times it seems like you're watching something which has no point.
Gossip, badly-written dialogue, errors all over the place.
You'd wonder why they even bothered with this, and what the actors thought of the actual production?
An unauthorised biography it may definitely be, but more to the point, it's hardly even worthy of having the word 'biography' in the title at all since there's so many inaccuracies throughout the film and the jumbled, jump-cut editing of scenes does nothing to help this.