6/10
A Cetinich Review (#1 - Cathing Fire): Don't Always Trust An IMDb Rating
8 December 2013
To begin with, I've read The Hunger Games books and absolutely loved them. It was thrilling and there was a twist at the end of each chapter, which made you want to read on. The first Hunger Games movie was OKAY - it didn't refer to the book a lot but still had its fair share of action scenes and reasonable acting.

I waited a whole year for Catching Fire, and when it came out I couldn't wait to see it - my expectations were high ... even before I saw the IMDb rating of 8.2. I walked into the theatre, took my seat and watched. When the movie came to an end, I just shook my head and left.

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire felt very rushed - even for a two and a half hour movie. The first hour was a lot of nothingness (to me anyway). When they got into the arena, I hoped the action would save the movie, but unfortunately, it made it worse.

The action scenes were rushed, they figured a lot of the issues out very quickly and there was far too many "near-death" moments for Peeta.

If there was one thing that saved this movie, it would have to be Jennifer Lawrence's acting. She's very good at what she does, and she is most definitely a rising star in the movie industry.

Hopefully the next two Hunger Games movies won't be as bad. Catching Fire was a rushed movie, with boring action scenes but reasonable acting. And come to think of it, I don't think I even saw the title screen at the beginning of the movie to say what the movie was called. Someone sat in front of me said to himself, "this isn't Prisoners," and left.

Acting: 7/10

Action: 5/10

Writing: 4/10

Setting: 6/10

Overall Rating: 5.5
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed