Although only one feature film ("Night of the Demon") has been based upon the ghost stories of M R James, a number of them have been adapted as short plays for British television, a format to which they are possibly more suited. During my childhood in the 1970s, I remember that the BBC regularly used to dramatise one every year under the title "A Ghost Story for Christmas", and this tradition has been revived in recent years. "The Tractate Middoth" is the latest offering in this series.
The story opens in an unnamed university library. Mr Garrett, a young librarian, is asked by a man named John Eldred for an obscure Hebrew religious text. (In the original story Garrett has the Christian name William, but that is not used here). In some ways, this is as much a detective story as a ghost story. The detective element derives from a will made by an elderly and malicious eccentric, Dr Rant, who has ingeniously concealed it within the book in question. Eldred turns out to be the nephew of the testator and the inheritor of his estate. The ghost element derives from the fact that Rant, although long dead, still seems to take a protective interest in the old book.
A frequent theme of James's work was the irruption into the rational, ordered world of his gentleman-scholars of dark, irrational forces, and this contrast between the seemingly rational and the uncanny is what gives them a lot of their force. "The Tractate Middoth" was first published in 1911, but was probably written earlier, and James probably envisaged the action taking place around 1895. Mark Gatiss, however, the writer and director of this version, has updated it to the 1950s, and I think that the change works quite well. The fifties, often seen as a brief interval of peace and stability between the turmoil of the war years and the social changes of the 1960s, were, like the late Victorian and Edwardian period, an era when it seemed, at least temporarily, that God was in his heaven and all was right with the world.
Gatiss sticks quite closely to the plot of James's story. The main difference is that in the original the ghost only appears once, near the beginning. We are doubtless meant to infer that Eldred's death is due to the agency of Rant's ghost, as malevolent in death as he was in life, but James never makes this explicit. Here, Gatiss takes the opportunity to have the ghost reappear at this point, probably to make the tale more frightening.
This film is not really in the class of the best James adaptations, such as Jonathan Miller's famous black-and-white version of "Whistle and I'll Come to You" (not part of the "A Ghost Story for Christmas" series), although the reason for this may be that "The Tractate Middoth" is perhaps not James's greatest story. The main problem is that it relies too heavily on an improbable coincidence; after his meeting with Eldred and his encounter with the ghost, Garrett goes to the seaside to recover- where the landlady of his boarding-house turns out to be none other than Eldred's cousin and the beneficiary of the missing will. Gatiss, however, handles his material well, telling quite a complicated tale in just over half an hour, and the ghost is suitably scary. This was enjoyable viewing for a Christmas evening. 6/10
The story opens in an unnamed university library. Mr Garrett, a young librarian, is asked by a man named John Eldred for an obscure Hebrew religious text. (In the original story Garrett has the Christian name William, but that is not used here). In some ways, this is as much a detective story as a ghost story. The detective element derives from a will made by an elderly and malicious eccentric, Dr Rant, who has ingeniously concealed it within the book in question. Eldred turns out to be the nephew of the testator and the inheritor of his estate. The ghost element derives from the fact that Rant, although long dead, still seems to take a protective interest in the old book.
A frequent theme of James's work was the irruption into the rational, ordered world of his gentleman-scholars of dark, irrational forces, and this contrast between the seemingly rational and the uncanny is what gives them a lot of their force. "The Tractate Middoth" was first published in 1911, but was probably written earlier, and James probably envisaged the action taking place around 1895. Mark Gatiss, however, the writer and director of this version, has updated it to the 1950s, and I think that the change works quite well. The fifties, often seen as a brief interval of peace and stability between the turmoil of the war years and the social changes of the 1960s, were, like the late Victorian and Edwardian period, an era when it seemed, at least temporarily, that God was in his heaven and all was right with the world.
Gatiss sticks quite closely to the plot of James's story. The main difference is that in the original the ghost only appears once, near the beginning. We are doubtless meant to infer that Eldred's death is due to the agency of Rant's ghost, as malevolent in death as he was in life, but James never makes this explicit. Here, Gatiss takes the opportunity to have the ghost reappear at this point, probably to make the tale more frightening.
This film is not really in the class of the best James adaptations, such as Jonathan Miller's famous black-and-white version of "Whistle and I'll Come to You" (not part of the "A Ghost Story for Christmas" series), although the reason for this may be that "The Tractate Middoth" is perhaps not James's greatest story. The main problem is that it relies too heavily on an improbable coincidence; after his meeting with Eldred and his encounter with the ghost, Garrett goes to the seaside to recover- where the landlady of his boarding-house turns out to be none other than Eldred's cousin and the beneficiary of the missing will. Gatiss, however, handles his material well, telling quite a complicated tale in just over half an hour, and the ghost is suitably scary. This was enjoyable viewing for a Christmas evening. 6/10