Cross Bearer (2013)
1/10
should be crucified.
21 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Where can one begin ? With this pile of pus, anywhere.

What a load of tripe. This isn't dark, gritty and sleazy, it's dumb, gross and stupid.

Acting - zero.

Story - zero.

Believability - zero.

Camera steadiness - 1.

Lighting - surprisingly, good.

Corny Crappiness - gazillion.

No originality, no skill, no interest, tired, clichéd, done a million times before with much better effect. Scratch that, with ANY effect.

Another example of why digital cameras should be sold with a license and a public listing as to where to serve the budding film-maker with a writ for wasting our precious time.

If you want to make films, make a name for yourself, be a director, *source talent*, starting with yourself, including script, story, acting and above all else, grab the audience and make the film something *memorable*, but with bloody orginality, not with a ridiculous script and hammy actors. Serving up excreta and expecting the public to make you a household name just gives the public a reason (and the right) to sling the poop right back at you.

No matter how small the budget, there is no excuse for a crap product and if you want to go somewhere & be somebody, put in some effort and TALENT, rise about the efforts of a 7 year old with school friends, a towel, and some tomato sauce, making a film in mummy & daddy's backyard.

That goes tenfold for anyone that writes gushing meretricious drivel, praising a thimble of flea dung as the next "Michaelangelo of Movies", in order to hoodwink some poor fool into watching 90 minutes of dross for some hidden reasons, like you were an extra on the film, know the friend of someone who once knew someone who went to school with one of the make-up girls, or were promised $10 if you write a good review for pure puke.

Tosser.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed