How much more does something need to show the viewer how stupid it is? If it was disgusting and otherwise really funny then, sure, something is there... but no, it's just idiotic, and the worst is that it might truly think it's funny. Waters can't call himself an 'artist', no... sure, art is subjective, but while a golden toilet may be symbolic, eating faeces is symbolic of only idiocy (and by all means, some people may somehow like it, but it still doesn't make it movie-worthy, I shudder even hearing people calling this a 'film'... it is a pile of faeces, that is truly all it qualified for).
It is, like, horror movies aren't usually the most amazing movies ever, especially slashers... but in comparison... at least they try to convey horror, this nonsense on the other hand thinks it's comedy when it's more horror than anything, and mostly because the actors are so pathetic...
Where is the last paragraph I added later, imdb?
It is, like, horror movies aren't usually the most amazing movies ever, especially slashers... but in comparison... at least they try to convey horror, this nonsense on the other hand thinks it's comedy when it's more horror than anything, and mostly because the actors are so pathetic...
Where is the last paragraph I added later, imdb?