It's not quite as good as 1994's PULSE, with less spectacle and not quite as great music (this last point is very subjective though, as I'm more of a fan of Pink Floyd's mid to late 70s output).
The concert material is mostly great, added CGI animation aside, which is pretty dated. The other visuals, particularly of the beautiful surrounding landscapes, were really good though.
Still, the director's cut is probably worth it for the behind the scenes interview stuff. It's not as good as the music, and isn't hugely insightful, but it's still cool to get a glimpse of Pink Floyd doing their thing right before Dark Side Of the Moon would make them absolute musical legends.
It's a must watch for any Pink Floyd fan, but given its age and reputation I'm sure most fans have already seen it.
Still, the director's cut is probably worth it for the behind the scenes interview stuff. It's not as good as the music, and isn't hugely insightful, but it's still cool to get a glimpse of Pink Floyd doing their thing right before Dark Side Of the Moon would make them absolute musical legends.
It's a must watch for any Pink Floyd fan, but given its age and reputation I'm sure most fans have already seen it.