5/10
Needed better acting
9 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Decent story building for the middle film in a trilogy and some good scares but whereas I thought the first film probably qualifies as the best found footage film I've seen, the second film is held back by some poor acting. In the first film you are instantly introduced to Sara and Paul joking around about her movie knowledge (or lack of) and they just come across as very likeable and believable, the second though two of the actors (Molly and Brock) overact so badly it makes them difficult to watch, for me it was a relief to see scenes without them but I wouldn't say acting from the other actors is great either, it's just not as bad as Molly and Brock.

There is a pub scene in this film that tries to build likeability of the characters in this film but it just doesn't work like the scenes of the group talking about previous Hell House ventures in the first film.

Overall not the worst, but I hope for better acting in the 3rd film which I'll still watch in hope that it can reproduce the quality of the first film.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed