2/10
Important Topic, but nearly 3 hours of an atrocious movie.
15 October 2020
This film is basically a regurgitated lecture of Peter Joseph's lectures. One character in the film is played as a professor and is quoted as saying "Some things were considered external to this contrived competitive game they called business" This clearly sounds way too much how Peter Joseph uniquely talks.

The script was indigestible and felt like a course instead of a movie. There was literally no plot. I guess you can say there was a tiny storyline, but it was clouded out by over used jargon. It was very hard to keep my eyes on it for nearly 3 hours.

The Good:
  • The music was nice and fit the scenery of the film very well.
  • I follow Peter Joseph's work, so I do find the topics in the film extremely important


The Bad:
  • No plot. Not a documentary. My guess is you can call it a Mockumentary
  • Acting is so bad. Like really bad. I can't knock the actors. Al Pacino himself wouldn't be able to give life to such a script.
  • The special effects and color grading was bad and pretentious at best. Overblown soft tones and lumination was a bit nauseating.


Conclusion: I gave the rating of this film a 2 and not a 1 because I felt that the film's topic is important. Capitalism is an extremely inefficient system. Although we have no other system better to replace it, we have elitist fans who defend Capitalism which ultimately impedes on any progress to our social condition.

This film feels as though it's directed at Peter himself and those who agree heavily with the Zeitgeist Movement. If there was any attempt to bring further outreach to those outside this circle or provide an enjoyable movie, then this Film failed miserably. If there was no attempt to bring further outreach and it was created purely to provide a somewhat entertaining outlook of the movement for those WITHIN the circle, I think it did well.
38 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed