9/10
Art for art's sake
3 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Of course that lady Ann Freedman is still selling "art" and Pei Shen is enjoying his life back home, painting for himself. What else to do ? They are not guilty as so many people think they are. They were just selling another "Rothko" which, truth be told, looked the same as the original. The "art" of Rothko and Pollock it is not even "art" in the true sense. As our wonderful thinker Roger Scruton once said : "When art becomes merely shock value, our sense of humanity is slowly degraded. Art once made a cult of beauty. Now we have a cult of ugliness instead. This has made art into an elaborate joke, one which by now has ceased to be funny." So true... No wonder why these so called "art critiques" are merely players and fake thinkers. How could anyone call Rothko, Pollock or Duchamp ARTISTS ? perhaps amateor or experimentalists.. ..yes
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed