Review of Public Eye

Public Eye (1965–1975)
10/10
How far has TV fallen since?????.
12 June 2021
No sensationalism, no mindless action, no mediocre plot twists for shock value, no condescending preaching, no axes to grind and no ham fisted attempts to push political agendas. This show is a revelation for us mired in this loathesome modern world.

The show conveys more reality to what life is really like than reality television ever did which is not so ironic given how phony and jaded reality tv is. Television during the era of Public Eye was theatrical and this show, shot almost entirely on video instead of the then standard, video in studio/film on location is no different.

Alfred Burke is an actor I barely saw in other shows. He makes Frank Marker all his own and he seems to have had no trouble doing it. Frank Marker is a likable but seedy inquiry agent, a title he prefers instead of private detective. It's the work that makes him seedy. Unglamorous realistic plot lines. Sometimes Marker gets more trouble than he expects but alot of the trouble you would not expect to see other fictional private eyes to get into in old movies or novels. Marker's character is fully fleshed out as well as the many characters that come and go over the course of the series. Edward Woodward once noted that television during this era was written in a way where you get a complete picture of all the characters in each show because they are fully realized in the writing. They aren't ciphers for the actors to fill in the blank based on their lines. That detail in writing is lost in 95% of today's television which is a shame.

The show moves about and has some interesting locations. The Thames series began in 1969 with Marker in Brighton, then Windsor, Walton and later Chertsey. During the ABC years, it was London and Birmingham.

The '69 season has a story arch for the Marker character instead of being focused mostly on a case per episode like the rest of the series. Much of the focus before '69 went to the supporting characters since the details of each case unfolds through their time on screen. The series returns to this format for all of the remaining episodes from '71 to '75. The cases are believable and the endings are often unique and surprising. There is one episode where Marker is hired to discover who is blackmailing a woman. She is threatened to have some secret about herself revealed to her husband who travels alot for his work and is not around. Much of the episode, we as the viewer try to guess what could be her secret since the woman isn't sure herself. We also follow Marker playing a cat and mouse game with the people he suspects are behind it all. It turns out her husband was an excon and the blackmailer knew him from prison, saw he had done well financially since his release and decided to pretend to have something on his wife to get some money out of them. Marker and the husband learn this after setting up a payoff and staking out the dropoff to see who picks up the money. The husband, feeling the anticipated anger also feels conflicted given that the wouldbe blackmailer is a fellow excon who clearly was not doing well since being released. An unexpected act of kindness occurs instead of an expected act of violence. Conflicted sums up how many of these episodes end. Like life, not much is cut and dry. These stories are no different.

The Thames television episodes are out of print on DVD but are probably still in rerun and on streaming sites somewhere but the ABC series during the first 4 years are almost entirely gone. That is roughly 40 episodes which were on tapes that were wiped as per the policy in those days for much of British television and unlike Doctor Who or the Avengers, I think it unlikely these missing episodes will turn up in some dusty film cans in an abandoned TV studio in Bangladesh or Tanzania. Appreciating what still exists from this series isn't difficult. As I said, entertainment is not of this quality anymore. So much focus is centered on everything EXCEPT what's most important, the quality of the story.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed