How can a kid on YouTube produce better CG effects than an actual movie? This thing was well shot, for straight to video, but the writing and directing are sloppy at best. Having a character respond to a remote and pristine natural location by saying "what a dump" shows a lack of awareness, as does having a character fully illuminated by Moonlight even though it's clearly visible directly behind him. I realize you can't always use squibs, both for safety and when shooting in natural environments to avoid damage, but surely CG bullet hits can be more than a perfectly symmetrical cloud of red floating in front of a character when they are riddled with gunfire.
The dinos were well modeled and animated, but little or no color correction was done to blend them into the live-action environments.
Frankly the CG dinos were better realized than most of the Human characters, who often not only acted foolishly but inconsistently to drive the next poorly planned plot element.
The dinos were well modeled and animated, but little or no color correction was done to blend them into the live-action environments.
Frankly the CG dinos were better realized than most of the Human characters, who often not only acted foolishly but inconsistently to drive the next poorly planned plot element.