4/10
Reasons for some of the really low scores and some undeservedly high scorees
27 December 2021
I read through some of the reviews and it became clear why such dichotomous scores appear here. For those who have not seen the show and are considering whether to give it a try, your guidance on review scores is as follows:

Scores of 2 or below: The setting of this story is 2075. The devastation mankind is facing is water depletion. Rationing of water based on some kind of class rank system, which also includes "no pets" policy. Due to this basic premise, you are going to have few climate change deniers and animal lovers bombing the reviews with low scores.

Scores of 9 or higher: With so many plot holes, these high scores represent nothing more than show of fandom.

The show has a somewhat interesting premise, but it truly fails to live up to its potential. Some of the military crew members act emotionlessly on purpose, and as a result, some scenes are simply monotonous. There are too many plot holes and implausibility that cannot be accepted even for a sci-fi show like this. I can go on and on, but the conclusion is that the show is very average at best. If you're a fan of this genre and have seen all of the Alien series and others, this might be an interesting take with a new form of "danger" the crew members must deal with. For others, I highly doubt it will worth the time invested.
11 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed