The entire story doesnt make sense. The writers could have done a much better job in making the show more authentic and alive. Purva who was supposed to be the villain of the story is nearly like the apple of the eyes of the audience by now. She is not the antagonist but rather the protogonist (or should i say the anti hero) is the real antagonist. One cannot really ascertain if he had had psychopathic tendencies from the very start of the show or if it just evolved in him by the situations he frequently finds himself in and might i include, he brings 90 percent of all the troubles unto himself and not the others - but one thing is certain - he has become a psychopath and a sociopath by the end of season 1.
Now, his love for Shikha too is no longer a pure, true one, but has been constantly on a gradual descent to stark obsessiveness since the very 2nd episode.
The wiser thing, the self sacrifical thing to do here would have been to let Shikha go. He did whatever he could, and when things didnt work out, he should have let it be. Instead, he kept making wrong choices, lying which led to more and more lies, then murders, and then tens of killings.
Just to have Purva killed, he agreed to blow out an entire stage and hall full of audience. Many, many innocents died.
At the start of the show, the main character confesses that three things ruin a man: Power,money and women. And while that may be true, but in this series, it is the protagonist himself who has ruied himself and others around him. WHY and HOW? Obsession over the dream to live a simple, mediocre life with a woman he thinks he loves but even that can be doubted at this point. He rather wants to possess the woman he declares he loves.
On the point of Purva, when Vikrant announced to Purva that he didnt want to marry her - Purva actually let him leave, but it was her sociopathic father who then forced him to marry his daughter. Poor Purva wasnt even aware of the electricity cuts, the water cuts, the data cuts. How is she the antagonist in any way. Much like the premise of the show seems to suggest, that isnt the case. If you writers want to make a psychological thrill on the descent of madness of a common man faced with atrocities, the plot of the show could be understood. But thats not the genre of the show as declares is it? Nor the intention.
Also. Plot holes. O yeah, mountains of plot holes. Professional assassin turned rogue? Car bumping over stone to prevent the assassination. Mistaking bullet on the windshield for a stone? A powerful politician dumb enough to kill the lover of a dude and marry him off to his daughter WITHOUT thinking of the consequences? The party gundas lying about Purvas death to Dharmesh without thinking of the consequences? Father in law giving a loaded gun to Vikrant after killing his beloved and that too after abruptly disturbing their honeymoon? People randomly capturing photos of two lover kissing in the space between two vehicles? So many lies and still Purva doesnt catch on, what is she, a log of wood? Purva being so hot and attractive that even a blind man gets a hardon and still the dude obsessively thinking of killing her.
COMEON, ALREADY!
In my opinion, he just needs to open his mouth instead of being so afraid of Purva. Girl may be possessive but genuinely loves him too. She isnt the villain, Vikrant is.
Now, his love for Shikha too is no longer a pure, true one, but has been constantly on a gradual descent to stark obsessiveness since the very 2nd episode.
The wiser thing, the self sacrifical thing to do here would have been to let Shikha go. He did whatever he could, and when things didnt work out, he should have let it be. Instead, he kept making wrong choices, lying which led to more and more lies, then murders, and then tens of killings.
Just to have Purva killed, he agreed to blow out an entire stage and hall full of audience. Many, many innocents died.
At the start of the show, the main character confesses that three things ruin a man: Power,money and women. And while that may be true, but in this series, it is the protagonist himself who has ruied himself and others around him. WHY and HOW? Obsession over the dream to live a simple, mediocre life with a woman he thinks he loves but even that can be doubted at this point. He rather wants to possess the woman he declares he loves.
On the point of Purva, when Vikrant announced to Purva that he didnt want to marry her - Purva actually let him leave, but it was her sociopathic father who then forced him to marry his daughter. Poor Purva wasnt even aware of the electricity cuts, the water cuts, the data cuts. How is she the antagonist in any way. Much like the premise of the show seems to suggest, that isnt the case. If you writers want to make a psychological thrill on the descent of madness of a common man faced with atrocities, the plot of the show could be understood. But thats not the genre of the show as declares is it? Nor the intention.
Also. Plot holes. O yeah, mountains of plot holes. Professional assassin turned rogue? Car bumping over stone to prevent the assassination. Mistaking bullet on the windshield for a stone? A powerful politician dumb enough to kill the lover of a dude and marry him off to his daughter WITHOUT thinking of the consequences? The party gundas lying about Purvas death to Dharmesh without thinking of the consequences? Father in law giving a loaded gun to Vikrant after killing his beloved and that too after abruptly disturbing their honeymoon? People randomly capturing photos of two lover kissing in the space between two vehicles? So many lies and still Purva doesnt catch on, what is she, a log of wood? Purva being so hot and attractive that even a blind man gets a hardon and still the dude obsessively thinking of killing her.
COMEON, ALREADY!
In my opinion, he just needs to open his mouth instead of being so afraid of Purva. Girl may be possessive but genuinely loves him too. She isnt the villain, Vikrant is.