The moral of the story: when a woman gets raped by a bunch of men, it's better not to expose the truth because it will make everybody miserable. You might even have the death of someone on your conscience and be a 'killer' and the worst of the bunch because you chose to expose the truth. By the way, rapists are innocent, it was the pills, and the woman (completely wasted) was horny and said an hour before that she wanted to make love to you, so why not rape her with four men in the room and film it all. By the way, if you hold her down and bang against her but do not penetrate, you have not done anything wrong.
Some men just don't get it... it makes me ashamed and angry at the same time that the director tries to justify things that are just not justifiable. Is this really still possible?
Some men just don't get it... it makes me ashamed and angry at the same time that the director tries to justify things that are just not justifiable. Is this really still possible?