City of Women (1980)
4/10
Fellini lost
4 April 2022
Fellini's thoughts about men-women relationships, genders' role in society, feminism, sexuality, types of men/women, etc translated into a big, slow, lenghty and often cryptic allegory.

The opening and closing scenes are especially funny but despite a dozen of brillant scenes (with the trademark scenographies directly from a circus of the surreal) the core of the movie is quite boring and uninspired. The writer/director wanted to include too much personal stuff, "original/important" philosophical views and still indulge into his hermetic style: as a result he lost touch with the viewer.

Furthermore these views - for what a lazy viewing might let me conclude - aren't that ahead of his time, let alone ahead of our time. Fellini as an artist - despite significant international success and an undeniably unique talent, sensibility and intelligence - formed, matured and got inspired mainly by local/italian topics/settings or - more precisely - universal topics seen from the POV/setting of an italian. Which obviously isn't bad per se, but carries a lot of cultural biases, especially cumbersome if the topics are feminism, genders' roles and sexuality. Therefore I don't really think Fellini's perspective on these themes - while possibly still more sophisticated than the average person in 2022 - is of any interest unless you're specifically interested in his own ideas. All in all I don't fell like suggesting to watch the film to anyone except the most hardcore Fellini fans.

The only unconditional plus comes from Donatella Damiani: among the countless women in the movie she stands out as unforgettably sexy with her voluptuous figure and mischievous attitude. I'm sure even Fellini was in love.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed